| Literature DB >> 30342491 |
Wanying Chang1, Lei Tang1, Caiwei Lu2, Min Wu2, Man Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of cervical lymph nodes is very important for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Conventional ultrasound is recommended to assess the status of cervical lymph nodes but the diagnostic performance is not satisfying especially in level VI lymph nodes. Recently, shear wave elastography has shown great potential in diagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring the value of shear wave elastography in ultrasound evaluation for level VI lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Because Hashimoto's thyroiditis may influence the diagnostic performance, a subgroup was also analysed that included only lymph nodes from PTC without Hashimoto's thyroiditis.Entities:
Keywords: Gray-scale ultrasound; Level VI lymph nodes; Papillary thyroid carcinoma; Shear wave elastography
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30342491 PMCID: PMC6195959 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4897-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1The diagram of ex vivo ultrasound scanning for specimens
Fig. 2A 61-year-old man with papillary thyroid carcinoma in the right lobe of thyroid. The long diameter and short diameter of one lymph node at ipsilateral level VI were 4.4 mm and 4.3 mm (a). S/L ratio was 0.977. Emean, Emax and ESD were 23.9 kPa, 30.8 kPa and 4.6 kPa respectively (b). Gray-ultrasound score and combination score were 2 and 5 respectively. This lymph node was confirmed to be metastatic by pathological diagnosis (c, original magnification × 40, and d, original magnification × 100)
Fig. 3A 54-year-old woman with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in the left lobe. The long diameter and short diameter of one lymph node at ipsilateral level VI were 4.1 mm and 2.1 mm (a). S/L ratio was 0.512. Emean, Emax and ESD were 18.0 kPa, 23.1 kPa and 2.9 kPa respectively (b). Gray-ultrasound score and combination score were 0 and 0 respectively. This lymph node was confirmed to be non-metastatic by pathological diagnosis (c, original magnification × 40, and d, original magnification × 100)
Fig. 4A 40-year-old woman with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in the right lobe coexisted with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The long diameter and short diameter of one lymph node at ipsilateral level VI were 7.4 mm and 3.2 mm (a). S/L ratio was 0.432. Emax and ESD were 34.0 kPa and 3.4 kPa respectively (b). Gray-ultrasound score and combination score were 1 and 2 respectively. This lymph node was confirmed to be non-metastatic by pathological diagnosis (c, original magnification × 40, and d, original magnification × 100)
Gray-scale ultrasound performance of central cervical lymph nodes
| Indexes | Pathological Results | All patients | Patients without Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | mean ± Sd |
| Number | mean ± Sd |
| ||
| Long diameter (mm) | (+) | 17 | 4.31 ± 1.20 | 0.739 | 17 | 4.31 ± 1.20 | 0.621 |
| (−) | 70 | 4.43 ± 2.02 | 56 | 4.07 ± 1.84 | |||
| Short diameter (mm) | (+) | 17 | 3.01 ± 1.16 |
| 17 | 3.01 ± 1.16 |
|
| (−) | 70 | 2.14 ± 0.81 | 56 | 1.93 ± 0.58 | |||
| S/L ratio | (+) | 17 | 0.70 ± 0.21 |
| 17 | 0.70 ± 0.21 |
|
| (−) | 70 | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 56 | 0.52 ± 0.14 | |||
The pathological result of (+) means metastatic and (−) means non-metastatic. Boldface indicates that p value is statistically significant
SWE performance of central cervical lymph nodes
| indexes | Pathological Results | All patients | Patients without Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± Sd |
| mean ± Sd |
| ||
| Emean (kPa) | (+) | 22.97 ± 7.75 | 0.197 | 22.97 ± 7.75 |
|
| (−) | 19.87 ± 9.03 | 17.88 ± 8.44 | |||
| Emin (kPa) | (+) | 13.29 ± 8.41 | 0.433 | 13.29 ± 8.41 | 0.809 |
| (−) | 14.88 ± 7.25 | 13.80 ± 7.44 | |||
| Emax (kPa) | (+) | 32.72 ± 10.21 |
| 32.72 ± 10.21 |
|
| (−) | 25.08 ± 11.80 | 21.98 ± 9.85 | |||
| ESD (kPa) | (+) | 4.75 ± 2.83 |
| 4.75 ± 2.83 |
|
| (−) | 2.55 ± 1.81 | 2.10 ± 1.44 | |||
The pathological result of (+) means metastatic and (−) means non-metastatic. Boldface indicates that p value is statistically significant
Diagnostic performance of each significant index
| Indexes | Cutoff value | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | ||||||
| All patients | Short diameter(mm) | 2.55 | 0.729 | 64.7 | 78.6 | < 2.55 | ≥2.55 |
| S/L ratio | 0.605 | 0.772 | 76.5 | 80.0 | < 0.605 | ≥0.605 | |
| Emax (kPa) | 29.20 | 0.705 | 70.6 | 71.4 | < 29.2 | ≥29.2 | |
| ESD (kPa) | 3.45 | 0.767 | 70.6 | 84.3 | < 3.45 | ≥3.45 | |
| Patients without Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | Short diameter(mm) | 2.55 | 0.783 | 64.7 | 91.0 | < 2.55 | ≥2.55 |
| S/L ratio | 0.605 | 0.769 | 76.5 | 76.8 | < 0.605 | ≥0.605 | |
| Emean (kPa) | 21.15 | 0.690 | 76.5 | 73.2 | < 21.15 | ≥21.15 | |
| Emax (kPa) | 25.65 | 0.779 | 76.5 | 76.8 | < 25.65 | ≥25.65 | |
| ESD (kPa) | 3.45 | 0.822 | 70.6 | 91.1 | < 3.45 | ≥3.45 | |
Diagnostic performance of gray-scale ultrasound and combination method
| Methods | Best cutoff value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | Gray-scale ultrasound | 1.5 | 52.9 | 98.6 | 0.841 |
| Combination method | 1.5 | 82.4 | 77.1 | 0.887 | |
| Patients without Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | Gray-scale ultrasound | 0.5 | 88.2 | 67.9 | 0.866 |
| Combination method | 1.5 | 94.1 | 76.8 | 0.925 |