Literature DB >> 30341966

Cilostazol decreases duration of spreading depolarization and spreading ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Kazutaka Sugimoto1, Sadahiro Nomura1, Satoshi Shirao1, Takao Inoue1, Hideyuki Ishihara1, Reo Kawano2, Akiko Kawano1, Fumiaki Oka1, Eiichi Suehiro1, Hirokazu Sadahiro1, Mizuya Shinoyama1, Takayuki Oku1, Yuichi Maruta1, Yuya Hirayama1, Koichiro Hiyoshi1, Miwa Kiyohira1, Hiroshi Yoneda1, Koki Okazaki1, Jens P Dreier3,4,5, Michiyasu Suzuki1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, angiographic vasospasm (aVS) has been thought to cause delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, successful treatment of aVS alone does not result in improved neurological outcome. Therefore, there may be other potential causes of poor neurological outcome, including spreading depolarization (SD). A recent study showed beneficial effects of cilostazol on DCI and neurological outcome. The present prospective clinical trial and experimental study focused on effects of cilostazol on SDs.
METHODS: Fifty aSAH patients were treated with clip ligation and randomly assigned to a cilostazol (n = 23) or control group (n = 27). Effects of cilostazol on DCI, aVS, and SDs, measured with subdural electrodes, were examined. The effect of cilostazol on SD-induced perfusion deficits (spreading ischemia) was assessed in an aSAH-mimicking model.
RESULTS: There was a trend for less DCI in the cilostazol group, but it did not reach our threshold for statistical significance (13.0% vs 40.0%, odds ratio = 0.266, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.059-1.192, p = 0.084). However, the total SD-induced depression duration per recording day (22.2 vs 30.2 minutes, β = -251.905, 95% CI = -488.458 to -15.356, p = 0.043) and the occurrence of isoelectric SDs (0 vs 4 patients, β = -0.916, 95% CI = -1.746 to -0.085, p = 0.037) were significantly lower in the cilostazol group. In rats, cilostazol significantly shortened SD-induced spreading ischemia compared to vehicle (Student t test, difference = 30.2, 95% CI = 5.3-55.1, p = 0.020).
INTERPRETATION: Repair of the neurovascular response to SDs by cilostazol, as demonstrated in the aSAH-mimicking model, may be a promising therapy to control DCI. Ann Neurol 2018;84:873-885.
© 2018 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30341966     DOI: 10.1002/ana.25361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  12 in total

Review 1.  Spreading Depolarizations and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kazutaka Sugimoto; David Y Chung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Poster Viewing Sessions PB01-B01 to PB03-V09.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Cortical Spreading Depolarizations in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Moncef Berhouma; Omer Faruk Eker; Frederic Dailler; Sylvain Rheims; Baptiste Balanca
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

4.  Cerebral Autoregulation Correlation With Outcomes and Spreading Depolarization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Bryce Owen; Adarsh Vangala; Chanju Fritch; Ali A Alsarah; Tom Jones; Herbert Davis; C William Shuttleworth; Andrew P Carlson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 10.170

Review 5.  Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  David Y Chung; Mohamad Abdalkader; Thanh N Nguyen
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Intracranial pressure spikes trigger spreading depolarizations.

Authors:  Fumiaki Oka; Homa Sadeghian; Mohammad A Yaseen; Buyin Fu; Sreekanth Kura; Tao Qin; Sava Sakadžić; Kazutaka Sugimoto; Takao Inoue; Hideyuki Ishihara; Sadahiro Nomura; Michiyasu Suzuki; Cenk Ayata
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 15.255

7.  Correlates of Spreading Depolarization, Spreading Depression, and Negative Ultraslow Potential in Epidural Versus Subdural Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Jens P Dreier; Sebastian Major; Coline L Lemale; Vasilis Kola; Clemens Reiffurth; Karl Schoknecht; Nils Hecht; Jed A Hartings; Johannes Woitzik
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Electroencephalography, Hospital Complications, and Longitudinal Outcomes After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  India A Lissak; Joseph J Locascio; Sahar F Zafar; Riana L Schleicher; Aman B Patel; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Christopher J Stapleton; Matthew J Koch; Jennifer A Kim; Kasey Anderson; Jonathan Rosand; M Brandon Westover; W Taylor Kimberly; Eric S Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.532

9.  The Updated Role of the Blood Brain Barrier in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: From Basic and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Sheng Chen; PengLei Xu; YuanJian Fang; Cameron Lenahan
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 10.  Pathophysiology of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Review.

Authors:  William S Dodd; Dimitri Laurent; Aaron S Dumont; David M Hasan; Pascal M Jabbour; Robert M Starke; Koji Hosaka; Adam J Polifka; Brian L Hoh; Nohra Chalouhi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.