| Literature DB >> 3034149 |
M T Kenny, J K Dulworth, T M Bargar, J K Daniel.
Abstract
Sixteen diarylmethanes and ten aralkylaminopyridines were initially evaluated for their in vitro activity against rhinoviruses 1A, 2 and 64 and against coxsackievirus A21 and for their oral prophylactic and therapeutic activity in mice challenged with coxsackievirus A21. Based on these preliminary studies the diarylmethane (3,4-dichlorophenoxy)-(5 methylsulfonyl-2-pyridinyl)-methane and the aralkylaminopyridine (2-(3,4-dichlorobenzylamino)-5-methylsulfonylpyridine were compared with their oxygen bridged analogue 2-(3,4-dichlorophenoxy)-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine for in vitro activity against a larger number of picornaviruses and for their in vivo protective efficacy in dose response assays. All three compounds exhibit similar in vitro activity inhibiting 12 to 15 (52.2-65.3%) of the 23 picornaviruses tested at concentrations of less than 5.0 micrograms/ml. However, the aralkylaminopyridine was found to be the most active in vivo; significantly protecting coxsackievirus A21 challenged mice after a single oral dose of 37.5 mg/kg (P less than or equal to 0.05) and during a continuous oral dose regimen of as low as 18.8 mg/kg per day (P less than 0.01).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3034149 DOI: 10.1016/0166-3542(87)90024-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antiviral Res ISSN: 0166-3542 Impact factor: 5.970