| Literature DB >> 30340515 |
Rachel Jester1, Iya Znoyko1, Maria Garnovskaya1, Joseph N Rozier1, Ryan Kegl1, Sunil Patel2, Tuan Tran3, Malak Abedalthagafi4, Craig M Horbinski5, Mary Richardson1, Daynna J Wolff1, Razvan Lapadat6, William Moore7, Fausto J Rodriguez8, Jason Mull9, Adriana Olar10,11,12.
Abstract
Endolymphatic sac tumor (ELST) is a rare neoplasm arising in the temporal petrous region thought to originate from endolymphatic sac epithelium. It may arise sporadically or in association with Von-Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL). The ELST prevalence in VHL ranges from 3 to 16% and may be the initial presentation of the disease. Onset is usually in the 3rd to 5th decade with hearing loss and an indolent course. ELSTs present as locally destructive lesions with characteristic computed tomography imaging features. Histologically, they show papillary, cystic or glandular architectures. Immunohistochemically, they express keratin, EMA, and variably S100 and GFAP. Currently it is recommended that, given its rarity, ELST needs to be differentiated from other entities with similar morphologic patterns, particularly other VHL-associated neoplasms such as metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Nineteen ELST cases were studied. Immunohistochemistry (18/19) and single nucleotide polymorphism microarray testing was performed (12/19). Comparison with the immunophenotype and copy number profile in RCC is discussed. Patients presented with characteristic bone destructive lesions in the petrous temporal bones. Pathology of tumors showed characteristic ELST morphology with immunoexpression of CK7, GFAP, S100, PAX-8, PAX-2, CA-9 in the tumor cells. Immunostaines for RCC, CD10, CK20, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, TTF-1, thyroglobulin, and transthyretin were negative in the tumor cells. Molecular testing showed loss of 3p and 9q in 66% (8/12) and 58% (7/12) cases, respectively. Immunoreactivity for renal markers in ELST is an important diagnostic caveat and has not been previously reported. In fact, renal markers are currently recommended in order to rule out metastatic RCC although PAX gene complex and CA-9 have been implicated in the development of the inner ear. Importantly copy number assessment of ELST has not been previously reported. Loss of 3p (including the VHL locus) in ELST suggests similar mechanistic origins as ccRCC.Entities:
Keywords: CA-9; Copy number profiles; Endolymphatic sac tumor; PAX-2; PAX-8; Renal cell carcinoma; VHL
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30340515 PMCID: PMC6194746 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-018-0607-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Fig. 1Imaging Findings: Computed tomography shows bone destructive lesions involving the posterior aspect of the petrous temporal bones (Aa, B, C, Da, E-G, Ha, I, J, L, M, Na, O). Magnetic resonance imaging shows expansile complex partially solid and cystic masses centered on the petrous segment of the temporal bones demonstrating heterogeneous intrinsic T1 (Ab, Db, Hb) and T2 signal (Hd, Nb) and post-contrast enhancement (Ac, Dc, Hc). (# represents case number). Note: All images are pre-operative except K which is an axial T1-weighted post-operative (at recurrence) image
Fig. 2Histological and immunophenotypical findings: All tumors showed the characteristic papillary architecture (a, b, 100X) with bone invasion (b) and some showed follicular morphology (c, 200X). All tumors immunoexpressed GFAP (d, 400X), CK7 (e, 200X), PAX-8 (f, 200X), PAX-2 (g, 200X), and CA-9 (h, 200X). S100 was focally immunoexpressed (i, 400X) in all but one case
Fig. 3Overview of the clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular results. Abbreviations: mo.-months; N-no; Y-yes; yr.-years
Fig. 4Overview of the SNP-microarray findings: Loss of 3p in 8/12 cases and loss of 9q in 7/12 cases, copy number changes present in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Legend: chromosomal gains are depicted in blue, losses are depicted in red
SNP-microarray results
| Case # | Summary | ISCN 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3p, −9q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_90450511)×1[0.3],9q21.11q34.3(70715485_141213431)×1[0.3] |
| 4 | arr(1–22,X)x2 normal female | |
| 6 | -3p, −9q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3q11.1(1_91025539)×1[0.2],9q21.11q34.3(70726185_141213431)×1[0.2] |
| 7 | arr(1–22)x2,(X,Y)× 1 normal male | |
| 9 | -3p, −4q, −9q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_89605910)×1[0.1],4q32.1q35.2(160067846_191154276)×1[0.1],9q12q34.3(63455393_141011985)×1[0.1] |
| 10 | -1p, −2, −3p, −4q, −8, −9q, −14q, −15q, −16, −17q, − 19 | arr[GRCh37] 1p36.33p32.2(1_56794840)×1[0.2],2p25.3-q37.3(1_243199373)×1[0.2],3p26.3p11.1(1_91000000)×1[0.5],8p23.3-q24.3(1_146364022)×0[0.2],9q21.11q34.3(70965125_141213431)×1[0.5],15q11.2-q26.3(22437778_102531392)×1[0.2],16p13.3-q24.3(1_90354753)×1[0.2],17q11.1-q25.3(25295032_81195210)×3[0.2],19p13.3-q13.43(0_59128983)×3[0.2] |
| 11 | -3p, −9q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_89317847)×1[0.5],9q21.11q34.3(69901656_141213431)×1[0.5] |
| 14 | arr(1–22)x2,(X,Y)×1 normal male | |
| 15 | -3p, −9q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_89189701)×1[0.2],9q21.11q34.3(70251958_141213431)×1[0.2] |
| 16 | -3p, −9q, −14q | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_90311584)×1[0.2],9q21.11q34.3(70618596_141213431)×1[0.2],14q11.2q32.33(19754766_107349540)×1[0.2] |
| 17 | -3p | arr[GRCh37] 3p26.3p11.1(1_88135518)×1[0.15] |
| 18 | arr(1–22)x2,(X,Y)×1 normal male |
Abbreviations: ISCN the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature