| Literature DB >> 30340450 |
Abstract
This article reflects on an internal evaluation undertaken to estimate the potentials of a community-university pilot project to be developed into a bonafide innovation that can be applied at scale. The focus of the community-university partnership has been to reduce the unintended consequences of medical pluralism on the HIV and AIDS epidemic in Waterberg district, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Despite promising outputs from the partnership - including an increase in adherence to antiretroviral therapy and a reduction in stigma among traditionalists living with HIV - the partnership wished to establish whether further funding should be applied for to take the pilot from its current prototype status to a more established innovation. In order to evaluate the innovative potentials of the pilot, the opportunity vacuum model of innovation was adapted and applied. The findings indicate that (1) the application of the opportunity vacuum model of innovation to evaluate the potentials of the pilot to be developed into a bonafide innovation was fit for purpose and (2) the pilot contains the key ingredients that are associated with innovations in the making. The discussion reflects on the social potentials of the pilot to contribute to 90-90-90 from a global, national and local perspective. The reflection concludes by suggesting that the opportunity vacuum model of innovation is a versatile heuristic that could be applied in other contexts and the community-university pilot represents a nascent innovation which has sufficient potential to justify further development.Entities:
Keywords: Adjacent possible; HIV/makgoma conflation; community-university partnership; innovation; opportunity vacuum model
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30340450 PMCID: PMC6201777 DOI: 10.1080/17290376.2018.1536560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAHARA J ISSN: 1729-0376
Figure 1.The pluralistic health care environment in South Africa. Source: Author’s contribution.
Figure 2.A Sotho-Tswana language map, South Africa, with some examples of where makgoma has been reported on in academic writing. Source: Adapted from the 2011 census broken down to ward level, available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sotho-Tswana_peoples#/media/File:South_Africa_2011_Sotho-Tswana_speakers_proportion_map.svg. Using Wikipedia as a source is not generally preferred because Wikipedia is not peer reviewed. However, in this instance it is used because the map enables an important concept to be provided and no other source has been identified.
Legend for the numbers shown in Figure 1.
| Legend number | Influence of makgoma on social practices | Province | Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Infant death and ceremonial burial rituals (Boeyens, van der Ryst, Coetzee, Steyn, & Loots, | Limpopo | Waterberg District |
| 2 | Craft art (Joubert, | Limpopo | Blouberg area in the Capricorn District |
| 3 | HIV and AIDS (Shirindi & Makofane, | Limpopo | Capricorn District |
| 4 | Medicinal plant use (Chauke, Shai, Mogale, Tshisikhawe, & Mokgotho, | Limpopo | Mopani District |
| 5 | Ritual taboos (Niehaus, | Limpopo | Bushbuckridge District |
| 6 | Tuberculosis & treatment seeking behaviour (Mabunda et al., | Limpopo | Sekhukhune, Lepelle-Nkumpi and Sekhukhune Districts |
| 7 | HIV and AIDS (Sebata, | North West | Mahikeng Municipality |
| 8 | Stigma, HIV and taverns (Niehaus, | Gauteng | Rustenberg |
| 9 | Adherence to ART (Serekoane, | Free State | Xhariep District |
Source: Author’s contribution.
An estimate of how many people living with HIV the HIV/makgoma conflation may influence.
| Province | HIV prevalence by province, South Africa 2012 (Shisana et al., | Percentage distribution of the projected provincial share of the total population, 2002–2016 (STATS-SA, | Total living in that province (adapted from STATS-SA, | Total living with HIV in that province | 50% of people living with HIV may be influenced by traditional values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| Free State | 14 | 5.1 | 2851410 | 399197 | 199599 |
| Gauteng | 12.4 | 24.1 | 13474310 | 1670814 | 835407 |
| Limpopo | 9.2 | 10.4 | 5814640 | 534947 | 267473 |
| North West | 13.3 | 6.8 | 3801880 | 505650 | 252825 |
| Total | 48.9 | 46.4 | 25942240 | 3110609 | 1555304 |
Source: Author’s contribution.
Figure 3.The vacuum model of anthropogenic innovation. Source: Adapted from Planing (2017, pp. 7–13).
The ‘exiting’, deficit situation theme.
| Categories | Examples from the transcribed narrative |
|---|---|
| The HIV/makgoma conflation ( | |
| Stigma from the community ( | |
| Internalised stigma ( | |
| Denialism that HIV exists ( | |
| Poor relationship between clinic staff and people living with HIV ( | |
| Health policy: The first ‘90’ – testing, ( | |
| Health policy: The second ‘90’ – initiating treatment, ( | |
| Health policy: The third ‘90’ – achieving and maintaining a fully suppressed viral load | N/A |
Source: Author’s contribution.
Coding that relates to Planing’s (2017) opportunity vacuum model of innovation.
| Theme | Categories | Examples from primary (narrative) or secondary sources |
|---|---|---|
| Dimension 1: Adjacent feasible (technology) – ( | The integration of the action themes into the EAD’s educational packages | The EAD integrated the action themes in late 2015 and they continue to use them in their outreach educational packages . |
| Dimension 2: Adjacent viable (economy) | Integration and no additional costs | The start-up costs to integrate the action themes into existing educational materials were subsidised through the research grant but there are now no additional costs. Further details have been reported on by Burman et al. . |
| Dimension 3.1: Adjacent acceptable – global scale (global health policy recommendations) | Health policy: the first ‘90’ – testing. Explanations as to why traditionalists do not test, ( | |
| Health policy: contributions to the second ‘90’ – initiating treatment, ( | ||
| Health policy: contributions to the third ‘90’ – achieving and maintaining a fully suppressed viral load, ( | ||
| Dimension 3.2: Adjacent acceptable – national scale (NSP) | Reduction in stigma ( | |
| Reduction in internalised stigma ( | ||
| Increased disclosure ( | ||
| Reduction in denialism ( | ||
| Dimension 3.3: Adjacent acceptable – local scale (lifeworlds of the group discussion participants) | Utility of the origins of HIV action theme ( | |
| Utility of the viral load action theme ( | ||
| Utility of the chronic not death sentence action theme ( | ||
| Dimension 3.4: Adjacent acceptable (increasing the influence of the action themes) | Desire by Support Group members to share the information with others ( |
Source: Author’s contribution.