Literature DB >> 30340253

Performance of secondary wastewater treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern implicated in crop uptake and antibiotic resistance spread: A review.

Pawel Krzeminski1, Maria Concetta Tomei2, Popi Karaolia3, Alette Langenhoff4, C Marisa R Almeida5, Ewa Felis6, Fanny Gritten7, Henrik Rasmus Andersen8, Telma Fernandes9, Celia M Manaia9, Luigi Rizzo10, Despo Fatta-Kassinos3.   

Abstract

Contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) discharged in effluents of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), not specifically designed for their removal, pose serious hazards to human health and ecosystems. Their impact is of particular relevance to wastewater disposal and re-use in agricultural settings due to CEC uptake and accumulation in food crops and consequent diffusion into the food-chain. This is the reason why the chemical CEC discussed in this review have been selected considering, besides recalcitrance, frequency of detection and entity of potential hazards, their relevance for crop uptake. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have been included as microbial CEC because of the potential of secondary wastewater treatment to offer conditions favourable to the survival and proliferation of ARB, and dissemination of ARGs. Given the adverse effects of chemical and microbial CEC, their removal is being considered as an additional design criterion, which highlights the necessity of upgrading conventional WWTPs with more effective technologies. In this review, the performance of currently applied biological treatment methods for secondary treatment is analysed. To this end, technological solutions including conventional activated sludge (CAS), membrane bioreactors (MBRs), moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs), and nature-based solutions such as constructed wetlands (CWs) are compared for the achievable removal efficiencies of the selected CEC and their potential of acting as reservoirs of ARB&ARGs. With the aim of giving a picture of real systems, this review focuses on data from full-scale and pilot-scale plants treating real urban wastewater. To achieve an integrated assessment, technologies are compared considering also other relevant evaluation parameters such as investment and management costs, complexity of layout and management, present scale of application and need of a post-treatment. Comparison results allow the definition of design and operation strategies for the implementation of CEC removal in WWTPs, when agricultural reuse of effluents is planned.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic resistance; Biological processes; CEC removal; Crop uptake; EU Watch list; Secondary wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30340253     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  15 in total

1.  Investigation into the bacterial diversity of sediment samples obtained from Berg River, Western Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Oluwadara Alegbeleye; Arghavan Alisoltani; Akebe Luther King Abia; Adetunji Ajibola Awe; Adewole Tomiwa Adetunji; Saidat Rabiu; Beatrice Olutoyin Opeolu
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 2.  Occurrence of antibiotics and bacterial resistance genes in wastewater: resistance mechanisms and antimicrobial resistance control approaches.

Authors:  Christopher Mutuku; Zoltan Gazdag; Szilvia Melegh
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.253

3.  Amoxicillin Retention/Release in Agricultural Soils Amended with Different Bio-Adsorbent Materials.

Authors:  Raquel Cela-Dablanca; Ana Barreiro; Lucia Rodríguez-López; Vanesa Santás-Miguel; Manuel Arias-Estévez; María J Fernández-Sanjurjo; Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez; Avelino Núñez-Delgado
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Porous Carrageenan-Derived Carbons for Efficient Ciprofloxacin Removal from Water.

Authors:  João Nogueira; Maria António; Sergey M Mikhalev; Sara Fateixa; Tito Trindade; Ana L Daniel-da-Silva
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Effect of Powdered Activated Carbon as Advanced Step in Wastewater Treatments on Antibiotic Resistant Microorganisms.

Authors:  Damiana Ravasi; Roger König; Pamela Principi; Giuseppe Perale; Antonella Demarta
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 6.  Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the wastewater pathway into surface water: A review.

Authors:  Erick R Bandala; Brittany R Kruger; Ivana Cesarino; Alcides L Leao; Buddhi Wijesiri; Ashantha Goonetilleke
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  PFAS Degradation in Ultrapure and Groundwater Using Non-Thermal Plasma.

Authors:  Davide Palma; Dimitra Papagiannaki; Manuel Lai; Rita Binetti; Mohamad Sleiman; Marco Minella; Claire Richard
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Data-driven prediction and control of wastewater treatment process through the combination of convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network.

Authors:  Zhiwei Guo; Boxin Du; Jianhui Wang; Yu Shen; Qiao Li; Dong Feng; Xu Gao; Heng Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Environmental Risk and Risk of Resistance Selection Due to Antimicrobials' Occurrence in Two Polish Wastewater Treatment Plants and Receiving Surface Water.

Authors:  Joanna Giebułtowicz; Grzegorz Nałęcz-Jawecki; Monika Harnisz; Dawid Kucharski; Ewa Korzeniewska; Grażyna Płaza
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Progress and prospects of applying carbon-based materials (and nanomaterials) to accelerate anaerobic bioprocesses for the removal of micropollutants.

Authors:  Ana Rita Silva; Maria Madalena Alves; Luciana Pereira
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.