Literature DB >> 30339916

Biophysical simulations and structure-based modeling of residue interaction networks in the tumor suppressor proteins reveal functional role of cancer mutation hotspots in molecular communication.

Gennady M Verkhivker1.   

Abstract

In the current study, we have combined molecular simulations and energetic analysis with dynamics-based network modeling and perturbation response scanning to determine molecular signatures of mutational hotspot residues in the p53, PTEN, and SMAD4 tumor suppressor proteins. By examining structure, energetics and dynamics of these proteins, we have shown that inactivating mutations preferentially target a group of structurally stable residues that play a fundamental role in global propagation of dynamic fluctuations and mediating allosteric interaction networks. Through integration of long-range perturbation dynamics and network-based approaches, we have quantified allosteric potential of residues in the studied proteins. The results have revealed that mutational hotspot sites often correspond to high centrality mediating centers of the residue interaction networks that are responsible for coordination of global dynamic changes and allosteric signaling. Our findings have also suggested that structurally stable mutational hotpots can act as major effectors of allosteric interactions and mutations in these positions are typically associated with severe phenotype. Modeling of shortest inter-residue pathways has shown that mutational hotspot sites can also serve as key mediating bridges of allosteric communication in the p53 and PTEN protein structures. Multiple regression models have indicated that functional significance of mutational hotspots can be strongly associated with the network signatures serving as robust predictors of critical regulatory positions responsible for loss-of-function phenotype. The results of this computational investigation are compared with the experimental studies and reveal molecular signatures of mutational hotspots, providing a plausible rationale for explaining and localizing disease-causing mutations in tumor suppressor genes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allosteric interactions; Cancer mutations; Mutational hotspots; Network analysis; Perturbation response scanning; Tumor suppressor genes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30339916     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj        ISSN: 0304-4165            Impact factor:   3.770


  6 in total

1.  Conformational Dynamics and Allosteric Regulation Landscapes of Germline PTEN Mutations Associated with Autism Compared to Those Associated with Cancer.

Authors:  Iris Nira Smith; Stetson Thacker; Marilyn Seyfi; Feixiong Cheng; Charis Eng
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Allostery: Allosteric Cancer Drivers and Innovative Allosteric Drugs.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Mingzhen Zhang; Ryan Maloney; Yonglan Liu; Chung-Jung Tsai; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.151

3.  Fast computational mutation-response scanning of proteins.

Authors:  Julian Echave
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Does Ras Activate Raf and PI3K Allosterically?

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Chung-Jung Tsai; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Drug Research Meets Network Science: Where Are We?

Authors:  Maurizio Recanatini; Chiara Cabrelle
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Dissecting mutational allosteric effects in alkaline phosphatases associated with different Hypophosphatasia phenotypes: An integrative computational investigation.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Ziyun Zhou; Xingyu Song; Mi Gan; Jie Long; Gennady Verkhivker; Guang Hu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.