Literature DB >> 30339280

Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation.

Simone Fatichi1, Christoforos Pappas2, Jakob Zscheischler3, Sebastian Leuzinger4.   

Abstract

Contents Summary 652 I. Introduction 652 II. Discrepancy in predicting the effects of rising [CO2 ] on the terrestrial C sink 655 III. Carbon and nutrient storage in plants and its modelling 656 IV. Modelling the source and the sink: a plant perspective 657 V. Plant-scale water and Carbon flux models 660 VI. Challenges for the future 662 Acknowledgements 663 Authors contributions 663 References 663
SUMMARY: The increase in atmospheric CO2 in the future is one of the most certain projections in environmental sciences. Understanding whether vegetation carbon assimilation, growth, and changes in vegetation carbon stocks are affected by higher atmospheric CO2 and translating this understanding in mechanistic vegetation models is of utmost importance. This is highlighted by inconsistencies between global-scale studies that attribute terrestrial carbon sinks to CO2 stimulation of gross and net primary production on the one hand, and forest inventories, tree-scale studies, and plant physiological evidence showing a much less pronounced CO2 fertilization effect on the other hand. Here, we review how plant carbon sources and sinks are currently described in terrestrial biosphere models. We highlight an uneven representation of complexity between the modelling of photosynthesis and other processes, such as plant respiration, direct carbon sinks, and carbon allocation, largely driven by available observations. Despite a general lack of data on carbon sink dynamics to drive model improvements, ways forward toward a mechanistic representation of plant carbon sinks are discussed, leveraging on results obtained from plant-scale models and on observations geared toward model developments.
© 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon cycle; ecosystem modelling; nonstructural carbohydrates; photosynthesis; plant growth; respiration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30339280     DOI: 10.1111/nph.15451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  12 in total

Review 1.  Two decades of functional-structural plant modelling: now addressing fundamental questions in systems biology and predictive ecology.

Authors:  Gaëtan Louarn; Youhong Song
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Axial changes in wood functional traits have limited net effects on stem biomass increment in European beech (Fagus sylvatica).

Authors:  Richard L Peters; Georg von Arx; Daniel Nievergelt; Andreas Ibrom; Jonas Stillhard; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Aleksandra Mazurkiewicz; Flurin Babst
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Turgor-driven plant growth applied in a soybean functional-structural plant model.

Authors:  Jonas R Coussement; Tom De Swaef; Peter Lootens; Kathy Steppe
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  The early arrival of spring doesn't boost annual tree growth.

Authors:  Cyrille B K Rathgeber; Patrick Fonti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  The role of China's terrestrial carbon sequestration 2010-2060 in offsetting energy-related CO2 emissions.

Authors:  Yao Huang; Wenjuan Sun; Zhangcai Qin; Wen Zhang; Yongqiang Yu; Tingting Li; Qing Zhang; Guocheng Wang; Lingfei Yu; Yijie Wang; Fan Ding; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 23.178

6.  Radial-axial transport coordination enhances sugar translocation in the phloem vasculature of plants.

Authors:  Mazen Nakad; Jean-Christophe Domec; Sanna Sevanto; Gabriel Katul
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.005

7.  Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees.

Authors:  Sophia Etzold; Frank Sterck; Arun K Bose; Sabine Braun; Nina Buchmann; Werner Eugster; Arthur Gessler; Ansgar Kahmen; Richard L Peters; Yann Vitasse; Lorenz Walthert; Kasia Ziemińska; Roman Zweifel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 11.274

8.  Impact of climate, rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, and other environmental factors on water-use efficiency at multiple land cover types.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair; Daeun Kim; Minha Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Wood Formation Modeling - A Research Review and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Annemarie H Eckes-Shephard; Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist; David M Drew; Cyrille B K Rathgeber; Andrew D Friend
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Jet stream position explains regional anomalies in European beech forest productivity and tree growth.

Authors:  Isabel Dorado-Liñán; Blanca Ayarzagüena; Flurin Babst; Guobao Xu; Luis Gil; Giovanna Battipaglia; Allan Buras; Vojtěch Čada; J Julio Camarero; Liam Cavin; Hugues Claessens; Igor Drobyshev; Balázs Garamszegi; Michael Grabner; Andrew Hacket-Pain; Claudia Hartl; Andrea Hevia; Pavel Janda; Alistair S Jump; Marko Kazimirovic; Srdjan Keren; Juergen Kreyling; Alexander Land; Nicolas Latte; Tom Levanič; Ernst van der Maaten; Marieke van der Maaten-Theunissen; Elisabet Martínez-Sancho; Annette Menzel; Martin Mikoláš; Renzo Motta; Lena Muffler; Paola Nola; Momchil Panayotov; Any Mary Petritan; Ion Catalin Petritan; Ionel Popa; Peter Prislan; Catalin-Constantin Roibu; Miloš Rydval; Raul Sánchez-Salguero; Tobias Scharnweber; Branko Stajić; Miroslav Svoboda; Willy Tegel; Marius Teodosiu; Elvin Toromani; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Daniel-Ond Turcu; Robert Weigel; Martin Wilmking; Christian Zang; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Valerie Trouet
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.