Literature DB >> 30338883

Heart failure in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: findings from the BIOSTAT-CHF study.

João Pedro Ferreira1,2, Marco Metra3, Ify Mordi4, John Gregson5, Jozine M Ter Maaten6, Jasper Tromp6, Stefan D Anker7,8, Kenneth Dickstein9,10, Hans L Hillege6, Leong L Ng11, Dirk J van Veldhuisen6, Chim C Lang4, Adriaan A Voors6, Faiez Zannad1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) require additive therapies and have a poor prognosis. However, patient characteristics and clinical outcome between HF patients treated in the outpatient setting vs. those who are hospitalized remain scarce. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF) included 2516 patients with symptoms and/or signs of HF: 1694 as inpatients and 822 as outpatients. Compared to ambulatory HF patients, inpatients had higher heart rate, urea, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, lower blood pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, sodium, potassium, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, had more often peripheral oedema, diabetes, anaemia, and were less often treated with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Outpatients had a more frequent history of HF hospitalization and received more frequently beta-blockers and/or ACEi/angiotensin receptor blockers up-titrated to target doses (P < 0.001). Inpatients had higher rates of the primary outcome of death or HF hospitalization: incidence rate per 100 person-years of 33.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.1-35.9] for inpatients vs. 18.5 (95% CI 16.4-21.0) for outpatients; adjusted hazard ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.07-1.43). Subdividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories, the primary outcome event rates were 14.3 (95% CI 12.3-16.7), 36.6 (95% CI 32.2-41.5), and 71.3 (95% CI 64.4-79.0) for inpatients vs. 8.4 (95% CI 6.6-10.6), 29.8 (95% CI 24.5-36.2), and 43.3 (95% CI 34.7-54.0) for outpatients, respectively. These findings were externally replicated.
CONCLUSIONS: Marked differences were observed between inpatients and outpatients with HF. Overall, inpatients were sicker and had higher event rates. However, a substantial proportion of outpatients had similar or higher event rates compared to inpatients. These findings suggest that HF outpatients also have poor prognosis and may be the focus of future trials.
© 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure & 2018 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entry criteria; Heart failure; Risk levels; Trials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30338883     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  14 in total

1.  Outpatient versus inpatient worsening heart failure: distinguishing biology and risk from location of care.

Authors:  Stephen J Greene; G Michael Felker; Javed Butler
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 2.  Heart Failure End Points in Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Critical Evaluation of Clinical and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Javed Butler; Milton Packer; Stephen J Greene; Mona Fiuzat; Stefan D Anker; Kevin J Anstrom; Peter E Carson; Lauren B Cooper; Gregg C Fonarow; Adrian F Hernandez; James L Januzzi; Mariell Jessup; Rita R Kalyani; Sanjay Kaul; Mikhail Kosiborod; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Darren K McGuire; Marc S Sabatine; Scott D Solomon; John R Teerlink; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Clyde W Yancy; Norman Stockbridge; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Defining the Phenotypes for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Dane Rucker; Jacob Joseph
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-09-30

Review 4.  High-density lipoprotein-mediated cardioprotection in heart failure.

Authors:  Ampadu O Jackson; Jun Meng; Huifang Tang; Kai Yin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Adherence and optimization of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptors blockers and beta-blockers in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.

Authors:  Valentina Carubelli; Carlo Lombardi; Claudia Specchia; Giulia Peveri; Chiara Oriecuia; Daniela Tomasoni; Mattia Di Pasquale; Riccardo Inciardi; Emirena Garrafa; Marco Metra
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 6.  The New Heart Failure Association Definition of Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Marco Metra; Elisabetta Dinatolo; Nicolò Dasseni
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 7.  Highlights in heart failure.

Authors:  Daniela Tomasoni; Marianna Adamo; Carlo Mario Lombardi; Marco Metra
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12

8.  The associations of population mobility in HIV disease severity and mortality rate in China.

Authors:  Wangting Li; Xiaoli Wang; Yahan Yang; Lanqin Zhao; Duoru Lin; Jinghui Wang; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Zhenzhen Liu; Xiaohang Wu; Xiayin Zhang; Ruixin Wang; Ruiyang Li; Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Wenyong Huang; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

9.  Heart failure documentation in outpatients with diabetes and volume overload: an observational cohort study from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; Philip G Jones; Michael Beasley; Jeanine Cordova; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg C Fonarow; Leo Seman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 10.  Outpatient treatment of worsening heart failure with intravenous and subcutaneous diuretics: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eric Wierda; Cathelijne Dickhoff; Martin Louis Handoko; Liane Oosterom; Wouter Emmanuel Kok; Y de Rover; B A J M de Mol; Loek van Heerebeek; Jutta Maria Schroeder-Tanka
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.