| Literature DB >> 30338422 |
Tanviben Y Patel1, Mark Buttner2, David Rivas2, Chad Cross3, Dennis A Bazylinski4, Joram Seggev2.
Abstract
Fungal spores are biological particles that are ubiquitous in the outdoor air. Spores of several very common fungal species are known allergens, with the potential to cause respiratory illnesses by exacerbating asthma and allergic rhinitis. The National Allergy Bureau typically has one monitoring station established per city to determine fungal spore counts for an entire metropolitan area. However, variations in fungal spore concentrations could occur among different locations. The objective of this study was to measure and compare airborne fungal spore concentrations in five locations in Las Vegas for the year 2015 to determine if there are differences among microenvironments in the city. Twenty-four-hour or 7-day air samples were collected from five sites across the Las Vegas Valley. Samples were analyzed with a light microscope for fungal spores and counts were converted to concentrations of spores per volume of air. Mixed-model methods were used to evaluate mean differences. Results showed that smuts (basidiomycetes) were the dominant spore type for all five sites during the spring season. Cladosporium species were responsible for the second most dominant spore type with the highest concentrations occurring during the summer and fall months. Results obtained from the five stations established in Las Vegas show that there are important variations among the sites regarding fungal spore concentrations. The data suggest that more sites and additional monitoring of outdoor allergens are needed to provide information necessary to inform the community of outdoor air quality conditions and their potential effects on public health. This study presents new outdoor fungal spore data for the southwest region of the USA, focused in the Las Vegas Valley.Entities:
Keywords: Airborne; Allergen; Fungal spore; Outdoor air quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30338422 PMCID: PMC6208991 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-7008-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1Map of airborne pollen collection sites in Las Vegas, NV (North ↑)
Meteorological data for Las Vegas, NV, in 2015 and 2016 (source: timeanddate.com and wunderground.com)
| Year | Month | Mean high and low temperature (°C) | Mean relative humidity (%) | Total precipitation (mm) | Mean wind speed/gusts (mps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | April | 27/13 | 17 | 6.6 | 5/11 |
| May | 29/18 | 25 | 6.1 | 4/10 | |
| June | 40/27 | 13 | 0.0 | 5/11 | |
| July | 38/27 | 21 | 4.8 | 4/11 | |
| August | 40/28 | 21 | 17.3 | 2/9 | |
| September | 37/24 | 22 | 0.5 | 3/9 | |
| October | 29/18 | 36 | 29.5 | 3/10 | |
| November | 18/7 | 31 | 6.1 | 3/12 | |
| December | 13/3 | 35 | 0.3 | 3/11 | |
| 2016 | January | 14/4 | 46 | 11.7 | 2/11 |
| February | 21/8 | 29 | 2.3 | 3/12 | |
| March | 24/12 | 24 | 0.0 | 4/10 | |
| April | 26/14 | 30 | 57.4 | 4/11 |
Fig. 2Total fungal spore counts at five locations in Las Vegas from April 2015 to April 2016 (spores/m3)
Fig. 3a Variation in airborne fungal spores for site A across the Las Vegas Valley (spores/m3). b Variation in airborne fungal spores for site B across the Las Vegas Valley (spores/m3). c Variation in airborne fungal spores for site C across the Las Vegas Valley (spores/m3). d Variation in airborne fungal spores for site D across the Las Vegas Valley (spores/m3). e Variation in airborne fungal spores for site E across the Las Vegas Valley (spores/m3)
Comparison of airborne fungal spore concentrations in Las Vegas (only significant differences are shown)
| Fungal type | Location (log mean) | Location (log mean) | Log mean difference | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
|
| A (0.419) | C (0.344) | 0.075 | 0.044 | 0.002 | 0.149 |
| B (0.736) | A (0.419) | 0.316 | < 0.001 | 0.242 | 0.391 | |
| B (0.736) | C (0.344) | 0.392 | < 0.001 | 0.317 | 0.466 | |
| B (0.736) | D (0.422) | 0.314 | < 0.001 | 0.239 | 0.389 | |
| B (0.736) | E (0.516) | 0.220 | < 0.001 | 0.144 | 0.295 | |
| D (0.422) | C (0.344) | 0.078 | 0.039 | 0.004 | 0.151 | |
| E (0.516) | A (0.419) | 0.097 | 0.011 | 0.023 | 0.171 | |
| E (0.516) | C (0.344) | 0.172 | < 0.001 | 0.098 | 0.246 | |
| E (0.516) | D (0.422) | 0.095 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.169 | |
|
| No differences among the 5 sites | |||||
|
| A (2.018) | B (1.881) | 0.137 | 0.002 | 0.051 | 0.224 |
| C (2.022) | B (1.881) | 0.141 | 0.001 | 0.055 | 0.228 | |
| D (1.972) | B (1.881) | 0.092 | 0.038 | 0.005 | 0.178 | |
| E (2.025) | B (1.881) | 0.153 | 0.001 | 0.066 | 0.239 | |
|
| B (1.386) | A (0.906) | 0.480 | < 0.001 | 0.417 | 0.543 |
| B (1.386) | C (0.992) | 0.395 | < 0.001 | 0.332 | 0.458 | |
| B (1.386) | D (1.090) | 0.296 | < 0.001 | 0.233 | 0.359 | |
| B (1.386) | E (1.034) | 0.353 | < 0.001 | 0.289 | 0.416 | |
| C (0.992) | A (0.906) | 0.086 | 0.007 | 0.023 | 0.148 | |
| D (1.090) | A (0.906) | 0.184 | < 0.001 | 0.122 | 0.247 | |
| D (1.090) | C (0.992) | 0.099 | 0.002 | 0.036 | 0.161 | |
| E (1.034) | A (0.906) | 0.128 | < 0.001 | 0.065 | 0.190 | |
|
| B (1.289) | A (0.804) | 0.486 | < 0.001 | 0.421 | 0.551 |
| B (1.289) | C (0.920) | 0.370 | < 0.001 | 0.305 | 0.435 | |
| B (1.289) | D (0.998) | 0.292 | < 0.001 | 0.227 | 0.357 | |
| B (1.289) | E (0.958) | 0.331 | < 0.001 | 0.266 | 0.396 | |
| C (0.920) | A (0.804) | 0.116 | < 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.180 | |
| D (0.998) | A (0.804) | 0.194 | < 0.001 | 0.130 | 0.258 | |
| D (0.998) | C (0.920) | 0.078 | 0.017 | 0.014 | 0.142 | |
| E (0.958) | A (0.804) | 0.155 | < 0.001 | 0.091 | 0.219 | |
| Total fungal spores | B (2.476) | A (2.410) | 0.066 | 0.019 | 0.011 | 0.121 |
| B (2.476) | C (2.404) | 0.072 | 0.011 | 0.017 | 0.128 | |
| B (2.476) | D (2.408) | 0.068 | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.123 | |
| E (2.475) | A (2.410) | 0.065 | 0.020 | 0.011 | 0.120 | |
| E (2.475) | C (2.404) | 0.072 | 0.011 | 0.017 | 0.127 | |
| E (2.475) | D (2.408) | 0.067 | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.122 | |