| Literature DB >> 30338120 |
S T Rashid1,2,3,4, N J Haywood1, N Y Yuldasheva1, J Smith1, A Aziz1, D J A Scott5, M T Kearney1, S B Wheatcroft1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Preservation of structural integrity of the endothelial monolayer and maintenance of endothelial cell function are of critical importance in preventing arterial thrombosis, restenosis and atherosclerosis. Obesity has been intimately linked with endothelial dysfunction, and reports of reduced abundance and functional impairment of circulating progenitor cells in obesity have led to the suggestion that defective endothelial repair contributes to obesity-related cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Diet‐induced obesity; endothelial regeneration; glucose intolerance; insulin resistance
Year: 2018 PMID: 30338120 PMCID: PMC6180714 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obes Sci Pract ISSN: 2055-2238
Figure 1Body mass increased significantly more in diet‐induced obese mice compared with chow‐fed controls at 3 months and was associated with an adverse metabolic phenotype. A, Body mass increased significantly more in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (45.1 ± 6.3 vs. 31.6 ± 0.9 g) N = 8 per group. B, Fasting blood glucose was significantly increased in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (6.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.3 ± 0.03 mmol L−1) N = 6 per group. C, There was a trend of increased plasma insulin levels in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (3.1 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 ng mL−1) N = 6 per group. D, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) was significantly increased in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (3.7 ± 1.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2) N = 6 per group. E and F, Glucose tolerance was significantly impaired in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls – area under the curve (AUC) 73.7 ± 6.2 vs. 47.0 ± 2.4 N = 6 per group. G and H, Insulin sensitivity was significantly decreased in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls – AUC 38.6 ± 4.7 vs. 18.7 ± 2.7 N = 6 per group. Data are presented as ±SEM (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001).
Figure 2Endothelial regeneration remains preserved in mice with diet‐induced obesity at 3 months. A and B, Representative in situ Evans blue staining 7 d after vascular injury (blue staining indicates denuded endothelium). C, Endothelial regeneration 7 d after vascular injury was no different in fat‐fed mice when compared with chow‐fed controls (40.2 ± 4.6% vs. 40.6 ± 3.9%) N = 6 per group. D and E, Representative images of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) tube formation on matrigel after addition of conditioned media from MACs. F, There was no difference in tube formation of HUVEC exposed to conditioned media from myeloid angiogenic cells (MACs) from fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (11.2 ± 1.6 vs. 13.5 ± 1.7) N = 10 fat and 15 chow. G and H, Representative images of adherent splenic‐derived MACs. I, There was no difference in adhesion of splenic‐derived MACs to fibronectin from fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (12.3 ± 1.7 vs. 11.1 ± 1.1) N = 11 fat and 8 chow. J, Enumeration of MACs derived from blood, bone marrow and spleen by cell culture after 7 d. Blood‐derived MACs from fat‐fed mice were more abundant than those from chow‐fed controls (8.75 ± 0.49 vs. 5.5 0.5) N = 8. There were fewer marrow‐derived MACs from fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (10.25 ± 0.95 vs. 17.4 ± 0.99) N = 8. Spleen‐derived MACs from fat‐fed mice were also less abundant than those from chow‐fed controls (11.38 ± 1.01 vs. 26 ± 1.7) N = 8. K, There was no difference in systolic blood pressure in fat‐fed mice compared with chow‐fed controls (82 ± 4.7 mmHg vs. 86.2 ± 6.2 mmHg) N = 11 per group. Data are presented as ±SEM (*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001). HPF = high‐power field.