| Literature DB >> 30336772 |
Kensuke Kiriishi1,2, Hirokazu Doi3, Nobuaki Magata1,2, Tetsuro Torisu1,2, Mihoko Tanaka1,2, Makoto Ohkubo4, Mitsuhiro Haneda4, Masaki Okatomi4, Kazuyuki Shinohara3, Takao Ayuse5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of mastication on cognitive abilities in the elderly have been shown in human studies. However, little is currently known about the effect of masticatory stimulation on cognitive and perceptual ability in younger populations. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the influences of masticatory stimulation on perceptual ability in adolescent boys.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescence; Aerobic capacity; Bite force; Global motion coherence; Masticatory stimulation; Occlusal force
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30336772 PMCID: PMC6194662 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1309-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Fig. 1a Schematic representation of stimulus in global motion coherence threshold measurement. Coherently moving dots are presented in white, while the remaining dots are in gray. Arrows indicate the direction of dot movement. Arrows and dotted line depicting the boundary of dot movement were not shown in the actual experiment. b A sample of colored film (left) and the measurement system (right) used in occlusal force measurement
Means and standard deviations of measurements
| Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Area (mm2) | 9.18 | 3.64 |
| Mean Pressure (MPa) | 63.39 | 78.46 |
| Occlusal Force (N) | 463.82 | 177.62 |
| Grip Strength (kg) | 21.99 | 7.78 |
| Aerobic Capacity (ml/kg・min) | 48.29 | 4.91 |
| 50 m Run Record (sec) | 8.07 | 0.91 |
| GMC Threshold (%) | 54.48 | 22.11 |
Note. SD Standard Deviation, GMC Threshold Global Motion Coherence Threshold
Correlation coefficients between each pair of observed variables
| Occlusal Force | Age | Grip Strength | Aerobic Capacity | 50 m Run Record | GMC Threshold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Area | 0.961** | 0.014 | 0.135 | 0.023 | −0.034 | − 0.331* |
| Occlusal Force | 0.028 | 0.165 | 0.038 | −0.089 | −0.415** | |
| Age | 0.835** | 0.756** | −0.811** | −0.294 | ||
| Grip Strength | 0.552** | −0.859** | −0.251 | |||
| Aerobic Capacity | −0.651** | −0.228 | ||||
| 50 m Run Record | 0.159 |
Note.*p < .05, **p < .01 without family-wise error rate control. GMC Threshold Global Motion Coherence Threshold
Fig. 2Scatterplot showing relationship between occlusal force and global motion coherence threshold
Standardized coefficients and statistics in multiple regression analysis
| β | SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | <.0001 | 0.147 | <.0001 | >.999 |
| Occlusal Force | −0.424 | 0.156 | −2.724 | 0.010* |
| Grip Strength | −0.029 | 0.361 | −0.08 | 0.937 |
| Aerobic Capacity | −0.031 | 0.245 | −0.129 | 0.899 |
| 50 m Run Record | −0.332 | 0.323 | −1.027 | 0.312 |
| Age | −0.503 | 0.364 | −1.383 | 0.176 |
Note. Grip Strength Averaged Grip Strength, Shuttle Run Shuttle-Run Record. df = 32, *p < .05. SE Standard error