Kyuichi Kadota1, Yoshio Kushida2, Seiko Kagawa2, Ryou Ishikawa2, Emi Ibuki2, Kosuke Inoue2, Tetsuhiko Go3, Hiroyasu Yokomise3, Tomoya Ishii4, Norimitsu Kadowaki4, Reiji Haba2. 1. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan. Electronic address: qichi@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan. 3. Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: At present, cribriform arrangements are regarded as a pattern of acinar adenocarcinoma. However, recent studies have indicated that clinical outcomes for lung adenocarcinoma patients with cribriform subtype are unfavorable. To validate the prognostic significance of the cribriform pattern, we analyzed a series of 735 Japanese patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma, which was restaged according to the eighth edition of the TNM staging system. METHODS: Tumors were classified in accordance with the 2015 WHO classification of lung carcinomas. The cribriform pattern was defined by invasive back-to-back fused tumor glands with poorly formed glandular spaces or invasive tumor nests of tumors cells that produce glandular lumina. Recurrence-free probability (RFP) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: After the addition of the cribriform pattern, 54 of 90 acinar-predominant tumors were reclassified as cribriform subtype. Five-year RFP for patients with the cribriform subtype (51%) was lower than it was for patients with acinar and papillary subtype (81% and 80%, respectively) but was comparable to that for patients with solid subtype (48%). Five-year OS for patients with the cribriform subtype (49%) was lower than it was for patients with acinar and papillary subtype (90% and 81%, respectively). On multivariate analysis adjusted for the eighth edition of the TNM staging system, the cribriform subtype was an independent prognostic factor of a worse RFP and OS. CONCLUSIONS: We have validated that the cribriform subtype is an independent factor of poor prognosis in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma.
INTRODUCTION: At present, cribriform arrangements are regarded as a pattern of acinar adenocarcinoma. However, recent studies have indicated that clinical outcomes for lung adenocarcinomapatients with cribriform subtype are unfavorable. To validate the prognostic significance of the cribriform pattern, we analyzed a series of 735 Japanese patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma, which was restaged according to the eighth edition of the TNM staging system. METHODS:Tumors were classified in accordance with the 2015 WHO classification of lung carcinomas. The cribriform pattern was defined by invasive back-to-back fused tumor glands with poorly formed glandular spaces or invasive tumor nests of tumors cells that produce glandular lumina. Recurrence-free probability (RFP) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: After the addition of the cribriform pattern, 54 of 90 acinar-predominant tumors were reclassified as cribriform subtype. Five-year RFP for patients with the cribriform subtype (51%) was lower than it was for patients with acinar and papillary subtype (81% and 80%, respectively) but was comparable to that for patients with solid subtype (48%). Five-year OS for patients with the cribriform subtype (49%) was lower than it was for patients with acinar and papillary subtype (90% and 81%, respectively). On multivariate analysis adjusted for the eighth edition of the TNM staging system, the cribriform subtype was an independent prognostic factor of a worse RFP and OS. CONCLUSIONS: We have validated that the cribriform subtype is an independent factor of poor prognosis in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Andre L Moreira; Paolo S S Ocampo; Yuhe Xia; Hua Zhong; Prudence A Russell; Yuko Minami; Wendy A Cooper; Akihiko Yoshida; Lukas Bubendorf; Mauro Papotti; Giuseppe Pelosi; Fernando Lopez-Rios; Keiko Kunitoki; Dana Ferrari-Light; Lynette M Sholl; Mary Beth Beasley; Alain Borczuk; Johan Botling; Elisabeth Brambilla; Gang Chen; Teh-Ying Chou; Jin-Haeng Chung; Sanja Dacic; Deepali Jain; Fred R Hirsch; David Hwang; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Dongmei Lin; John W Longshore; Noriko Motoi; Masayuki Noguchi; Claudia Poleri; Natasha Rekhtman; Ming-Sound Tsao; Erik Thunnissen; William D Travis; Yasushi Yatabe; Anja C Roden; Jillian B Daigneault; Ignacio I Wistuba; Keith M Kerr; Harvey Pass; Andrew G Nicholson; Mari Mino-Kenudson Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Tamás Zombori; Anita Sejben; László Tiszlavicz; Gábor Cserni; Regina Pálföldi; Edit Csada; József Furák Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 3.201