Fengming Chen1,2, Denise M Coslo1, Tao Chen1, Limin Zhang1,3, Yuan Tian4, Philip B Smith4, Andrew D Patterson1, Curtis J Omiecinski1. 1. Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences , The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States. 2. Department of Pathology , Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States. 3. CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics , Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) , Wuhan 430070 , China. 4. The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences , The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States.
Abstract
The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR; NR1I3) contributes important regulatory roles in biotransformation, xenobiotic transport function, energy metabolism and lipid homeostasis. In this investigation, global serum and liver tissue metabolomes were assessed analytically in wild type and CAR-null transgenic mice using NMR, GC-MS and UPLC-MS/MS-based metabolomics. Significantly, CAR activation increased serum levels of fatty acids, lactate, ketone bodies and tricarboxylic acid cycle products, whereas levels of phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, amino acids and liver glucose were decreased following short-term activation of CAR. Mechanistically, quantitative mRNA analysis demonstrated significantly decreased expression of key gluconeogenic pathways, and increased expression of glucose utilization pathways, changes likely resulting from down-regulation of the hepatic glucose sensor and bidirectional transporter, Glut2. Short-term CAR activation also resulted in enhanced fatty acid synthesis and impaired β-oxidation. In summary, CAR contributes an expansive role regulating energy metabolism, significantly impacting glucose and monocarboxylic acid utilization, fatty acid metabolism and lipid homeostasis, through receptor-mediated regulation of several genes in multiple associated pathways.
The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR; NR1I3) contributes important regulatory roles in biotransformation, xenobiotic transport function, energy metabolism and lipid homeostasis. In this investigation, global serum and liver tissue metabolomes were assessed analytically in wild type and CAR-null transgenic mice using NMR, GC-MS and UPLC-MS/MS-based metabolomics. Significantly, CAR activation increased serum levels of fatty acids, lactate, ketone bodies and tricarboxylic acid cycle products, whereas levels of phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, amino acids and liver glucose were decreased following short-term activation of CAR. Mechanistically, quantitative mRNA analysis demonstrated significantly decreased expression of key gluconeogenic pathways, and increased expression of glucose utilization pathways, changes likely resulting from down-regulation of the hepatic glucose sensor and bidirectional transporter, Glut2. Short-term CAR activation also resulted in enhanced fatty acid synthesis and impaired β-oxidation. In summary, CAR contributes an expansive role regulating energy metabolism, significantly impacting glucose and monocarboxylic acid utilization, fatty acid metabolism and lipid homeostasis, through receptor-mediated regulation of several genes in multiple associated pathways.
Entities:
Keywords:
NR1I3; constitutive androstane receptor; energy metabolism; metabolomics
The constitutive androstane
receptor (CAR, NR1I3) is a nuclear
receptor that regulates xenobiotic metabolism, detoxification, and
clearance.[1] Predominantly expressed in
the liver, CAR functions as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor
(RXR), binds to specific DNA motifs, and recruits coregulators to
influence target gene transcription.[2] CAR has been further elucidated as a key regulator of several energy
pathways, and proposed as a potential target for metabolic diseases
such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.[3−5]Activation of CAR by either 1,4-bis[2-(3, 5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene
(TCPOBOP), a mouse-specific direct receptor agonist, or phenobarbital
(PB), a prototypical indirect CAR activator, decreases blood glucose
levels and increases insulin sensitivity in both rodent models and
in human subjects.[6,7] CAR activation also prevents obesity
in a high fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity model and ameliorates liver
steatosis in both the HFD-induced type 2 diabetic model and ob/ob
mice.[7,8] Further, activation of CAR with TCPOBOP
in certain mouse models is atheroprotective, as indicated by reduction
of cholesterol, lipoproteins and atherosclerotic lesions.[9] More specifically, CAR activation reportedly
increases the utilization of glucose in the liver by increasing the
activities of hexokinase (HK), an enzyme responsible for the first
irreversible step in glycolysis, and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase
(PGD), a rate-limiting enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP).[8] Evidence suggests that CAR activation also inhibits
expression of the gluconeogenic enzymes, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
(Pepck) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6pase), resulting in decreased glucose production by interfering with
forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α
(HNF4A) activity.[10−12] Additional studies indicate that CAR acts with insulin-induced
gene-1 (INSIG1) and/or sulfotransferase 2B1b (SULT2B1b) to suppress
lipogenic gene expression, modulating expression of sterol regulatory
element-binding protein-1c (Srebp-1c) and its downstream
targets, fatty acid synthase (Fasn) and stearoyl-CoA
desaturase 1 (Scd-1), which are involved in fatty
acid biosynthesis.[3,8,13]In these respects, previous investigators have largely used discrete
analyses, focused on specific metabolic pathways, to determine the
effects of long-term CAR activation on altered energy metabolism and
transcriptional responses. To better delineate the more acute impact
of CAR activation in vivo, we conducted the current investigation
in mouse models to assess CAR as an effector of the global energy
metabolome, as metabolomic analyses provide valuable insight linking
transcriptional regulation, transcriptomics and the resulting phenotype
in both normal and diseased states.[14,15] Following
TCPOBOP administration in wild type (WT) and CAR null/knockout
(CARKO) mice, serum and liver metabolome alterations were analyzed
using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), ultraperformance liquid chromatography–mass
spectrometry (UPLC–MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
(GC–MS). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assays were also
conducted to assess the effects of CAR activation on the transcriptional
profiles of genes mediating the regulatory pathways exhibiting altered
metabolic function. The results of these investigations demonstrate
that short-term CAR activation significantly impacts the global energy
metabolome, altering levels of numerous metabolites related to glucose,
fatty acid and phospholipid production. In these respects, mechanistic
pathways accounting for CAR’s endocrinological effects were
elucidated. The results provide an experimental basis for considering
CAR as a therapeutic target for metabolic disease interventions.
Materials
and Methods
Chemicals
TCPOBOP and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). TRIzol reagent was purchased
from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). All analytical grade organic
reagents for GC, HPLC-mass spec and NMR (methanol, chloroform isopropanol,
acetonitrile and hexane) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis,
MO). Sodium 3-trimethylsilylm[2,2,3,3-d4]propionate (TSP-d4) and deuterium oxide
(D2O; 99.9% in D) were purchased from Cambridge Isotope
Laboratories (Miami, FL).
In Vivo Experiments
All animal care
and experimental
procedures complied with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal
Care and Use Committee at The Pennsylvania State University. C57BL/6 WT
male mice were purchased from Charles River (Horsham, PA) and permitted
to acclimate at least 1 week prior to treatment. CARKO mice were
generated by backcrossing WT mice with CAR-PXR double knockout mice
obtained from Dr. Wen Xie at the School of Pharmacy at University
of Pittsburgh.[16] The mice were maintained
under a standard 12 h light, 12 h dark cycle at a constant temperature
(23 ± 1 °C) with 45–65% humidity. Water and standard
chow were provided ad libitum.For each time
point and treatment, 6 male mice of approximately 8-weeks of age were
used. Each mouse was treated with either a single dose of 2 mg/kg
of TCPOBOP or the vehicle control (DMSO) via intraperitoneal (IP)
injection. Both the initial and final body weights of the mice were
recorded. After 48 or 72 h, blood and liver tissues were harvested
from the mice immediately following euthanasia via CO2 asphyxiation.
Blood was collected via cardiac puncture and then allowed to clot
at room temperature for at least 30 min followed by centrifugation
for 10 min at 3000g. The serum was aliquoted and
stored at −80 °C. The liver tissue was weighed, divided
and either placed in TRIzol reagent for RNA isolation or snap-frozen
in liquid nitrogen for storage at −80 °C until use.
Serum Glucose Analysis
Serum glucose concentrations
were measured using the Glucose Colorimetric Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical,
Ann Arbor, MI), which utilizes the glucose oxidase-peroxide reaction.
Following the manufacturer’s protocol, the serum was initially
diluted 1:10 in the assay buffer. The glucose standard was diluted
to construct a standard curve. Briefly, 85 μL of assay buffer
was added to 15 μL of diluted samples and standards, then 100
μL of the glucose assay was added, and the reactions were incubated
at 37 °C for 10 min. Absorbance was measured at 520 nm. The concentration
of glucose in the serum was derived using the standard curve and dilution
factors.
1H NMR Spectroscopy Analysis of Liver Tissue
Liver tissue sample preparation for NMR analysis were performed as
previously described.[17] Liver tissues (∼50
mg) were homogenized three times in 600 μL of an ice-cold methanol–water
mixture (2/1, v/v) using the Precellys tissue homogenizer (Bertin
Technologies, Rockville, MD). After centrifugation at 11 180g for 10 min at 4 °C, the aqueous supernatant was collected
and dried. Each of the water-soluble extracts was separately reconstituted
into 600 μL of phosphate buffer (K2HPO4/NaH2PO4, 0.1 M, pH 7.4, 50% v/v D2O) containing 0.005% TSP-d4 as a chemical
shift reference. After centrifugation, 550 μL of each extract
was transferred into a 5 mm NMR tube for NMR analysis. For more detailed
methods regarding 1H NMR spectroscopy, see Supporting Information.
Fatty Acid Profiling of
Liver Tissue Using GC–MS
Liver tissue sample preparation
for fatty acid profiling by GC–MS
were performed as previously described.[17] Liver tissues (∼50 mg) were extracted with 1 mL of methanol–chloroform
(2/1, v/v) containing 5 μL internal standards (50 μM C15:0
free acid and the methyl ester of C17:0) and then homogenized using
the Precellys tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Rockville,
MD). Liver homogenates were centrifuged at 20 187g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and 500 μL
of saline (0.9%) was added. The mixture was vortexed for 5 min and
centrifuged at 20 187g for 15 min at 4 °C.
The solution in the bottom layer was transferred to a 10 mL glass
tube and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. The residue was reconstituted
with 1 mL of MeOH/HCl (41.5 mL/9.7 mL), vortexed for 5 min, and incubated
overnight at 60 °C. Samples were mixed with 5 mL of hexane and
5 mL of saline, and vortexed for 5 min. The upper organic phase was
taken, dried down with nitrogen gas, resuspended in 200 μL of
hexane, and then transferred to an autosampler vial for GC–MS
analysis. For more detailed methods regarding fatty acid profiling
using GC–MS, see Supporting Information.
Total Serum Global Lipid Profiling by UPLC–MS
Total
lipids in serum were extracted using the Folch method.[18] Briefly, 25 μL of serum was mixed with
100 μL of chloroform and methanol (2:1 v/v) containing 2 μg
triacylglycerol (50:1). The samples were incubated at room temperature
for 5 min after vortexing. Following centrifugation (13 000g, 4 °C) for 10 min, the bottom layer was collected
and then dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas. The samples
were dissolved with 125 μL of solution containing isopropyl
alcohol, acetonitrile, and water (2:1:1 v/v/v). Following vortex and
centrifugation, 100 μL of supernatants were transferred to an
autosampler vial. For more detailed methods regarding total serum
global lipid profiling by UPLC–MS, see Supporting Information.
RNA Isolation from Liver
Tissues and Gene Expression by Real-Time
qPCR
RNA was isolated from mouse liver tissues using TRIzol
Reagent and converted to cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA Archive
Kit (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s
protocols. Real-time qPCR was performed with PerfeCTa SYBR Green SuperMix,
UNG, ROX (Quanta BioSciences, Gaithersburg, MD). Fifty ng of cDNA
template, 15 μL of 2× SYBR green Master Mix, 0.1 μM
final concentrations of forward and reverse primers were added into
30 μL reactions. The reactions were divided in half to generate
technical replicates and run on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection
System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Data were analyzed using the ΔΔC method as previously described.[19] All experiments were performed in accordance
with the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time
PCR Experiment (MIQE) guidelines.[20] Details
of the SYBR Green Primers used in the assays are summarized in Supplemental Table S1.
Data Analysis
All the experimental values are presented
as mean ± s.d. Graphical illustrations and statistical analysis
were performed with GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad). P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Evaluation
of Body and Liver Weight of WT and CARKO Mice Following
Short-Term TCPOBOP Exposure
The effects of short-term CAR
activation on the body and liver weight of WT and CARKO mice were
assessed using the specific mouseCAR ligand, TCPOBOP, at 48 or 72
h following a single IP dose of either DMSO or TCPOBOP. Resulting
animal weights, presented as percent body weight compared to initial
weight (A) and excised liver wet weights for each mouse, presented
as liver to body percentage (B), are shown in Figure .
Figure 1
Body weights were measured for all mice prior
to treatment (0 h)
and following DMSO or TCPOBOP at the time of harvest (48 and 72 h).
Livers were harvested and the weight recorded for untreated (0 h)
and treated (48 and 72 h) mice. Body weight percentage for WT and
CARKO mice (top) was calculated by comparing the body weight at the
indicated time point to the initial weight at 0 h. Liver/body weight
percentage (bottom) was calculated by comparing the liver weight to
the body weight on the day of harvest. Data are represented as
the mean of biological replicates ± s.d. Significance between
initial weight and each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05). Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment at each
time point indicated by # (p < 0.05).
Body weights were measured for all mice prior
to treatment (0 h)
and following DMSO or TCPOBOP at the time of harvest (48 and 72 h).
Livers were harvested and the weight recorded for untreated (0 h)
and treated (48 and 72 h) mice. Body weight percentage for WT and
CARKO mice (top) was calculated by comparing the body weight at the
indicated time point to the initial weight at 0 h. Liver/body weight
percentage (bottom) was calculated by comparing the liver weight to
the body weight on the day of harvest. Data are represented as
the mean of biological replicates ± s.d. Significance between
initial weight and each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05). Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment at each
time point indicated by # (p < 0.05).At 72 h post exposure to TCPOBOP, both WT and CARKO
animals exhibited
significantly lower body weights when compared to their respective
DMSO controls (Figure , top). Liver to body weight ratios revealed that only WT mice treated
with TCPOBOP exhibited significant liver weight gain relative to their
vehicle control DMSO counterparts (Figure , bottom). The latter results indicate that
the gain in liver weights were a direct result of CAR activation,
as were the subsequent phenotypic effects noted below related to overall
glucose and lipid profiles.
Expression of Known CAR Target Genes Involved
in Xenobiotic
Metabolism in Response to TCPOBOP
To confirm efficacy of
the experimental design, expression of several hallmark CAR-regulated,
hepatic target genes was assessed using qPCR. Among the transcripts
measured, expression of phase I xenobiotic gene transcripts, cytochrome
p450s (Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11, and Cyp1a1), and the phase II transcript, UDP glucuronosyltransferase
1 family, polypeptide A1 (Ugt1a1), were markedly
up-regulated in WT but not CARKO mice following both 48 and 72 h exposures
to TCPOBOP (Figure S1A and S1B). Although
glutathione S-transferase, pi 1 (Gstp1) expression
levels were not significantly altered by treatments in either group
of mice (Figure S1B), the transcript for
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible beta (Gadd45B), a CAR target gene associated with cell growth and apoptotic responses,
was significantly increased in WT mice treated with TCPOBOP treatment,
but not in CARKO animals (Figure S1C).
These results affirm the efficacy of the experimental model with respect
to CAR activation responses.
Determination of Glucose Concentration and
Metabolites in Serum
To evaluate serum glucose levels after
short-term exposure to TCPOBOP,
glucose concentrations from WT and CARKO mouse serum were measured
using a glucose colorimetric assay. The results demonstrated a significant
decrease in glucose concentrations at both 48 and 72 h in WT mice
following TCPOBOP treatment compared to their respective DMSO controls,
effects not apparent in CARKO mice (Figure ).
Figure 2
Serum glucose comparisons. Serum glucose concentration
for WT and
CARKO mice treated with DMSO or TCPOBOP at 48 and 72 h using the glucose
colorimetric assay kit (* p < 0.05).
Serum glucose comparisons. Serum glucose concentration
for WT and
CARKO mice treated with DMSO or TCPOBOP at 48 and 72 h using the glucose
colorimetric assay kit (* p < 0.05).
Metabolic Profiling by 1H NMR
Analysis in Liver Aqueous
Extract Samples
The effect of short-term CAR activation on
the liver energy metabolome was determined by using 1H
NMR analysis following tissue harvest at 48 and 72 h. An overview
of global metabolite changes was initially constructed by principal
component analysis (PCA), using normalized NMR data to visualize the
correlation between different groups and exclude abnormal data points.
Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of
NMR data was subsequently performed to further enhance the separation
between DMSO and TCPOBOP groups in WT or CARKO mice. The cross-validated
score plots demonstrated that significant intergroup metabolomic separations
were apparent in both 48 and 72 h treated WT mice (Figure A,B), but not in CARKO mice
(Figure C,D). Further,
the corresponding OPLS-DA correlation coefficient plots provided insight
into the relative contribution of the metabolites. Compared to the
DMSO group, the quality indicators of OPLS-DA for the R2X and Q2 parameters among the 48 h TCPOBOP group of WT mice were 0.61 and
0.64, respectively. Likewise, the variance derived from the 72 h WT
mouse group presented as R2X = 0.74 and Q2 = 0.72. Therefore, the
values for R2X and Q2 > 0.4 in the models clearly indicate the
wellness
of fit for the NMR data (Figure A,B). The results from the model evaluation with CV-ANOVA
and permutation tests further suggested that the models constructed
from the spectra data at 48 and 72 h were distinctive with respect
to their metabolite profiles, and their CAR dependency.
Figure 3
Mouse liver
tissue was extracted and subjected to 1H
NMR. Multivariate data analysis was performed to evaluate the differences
between DMSO and TCPOBOP treated WT mice at 48 (A) and 72 h (B) time
points as well as CARKO mice at 48 (C) and 72 h (D). OPLS-DA scores
(left) and coefficient-coded loadings plots (right) for the models
were obtained from NMR data. The OPLS-DA models were validated using
a 7-fold cross validation method, and the quality of the model was
described by the parameters R2X and Q2 values. Color-coded
correlation coefficient loading plots were employed to indicate the
significance of the metabolite contribution to the class separation
with a “hot” color (e.g., red) being more significant
than a “cold” color (e.g., blue). A cutoff value of
|r| > 0.707 (r > +0.707 and r < −0.707) was chosen for the correlation coefficient
as significant based on the discrimination significance (p ≤ 0.05).
Mouse liver
tissue was extracted and subjected to 1H
NMR. Multivariate data analysis was performed to evaluate the differences
between DMSO and TCPOBOP treated WT mice at 48 (A) and 72 h (B) time
points as well as CARKO mice at 48 (C) and 72 h (D). OPLS-DA scores
(left) and coefficient-coded loadings plots (right) for the models
were obtained from NMR data. The OPLS-DA models were validated using
a 7-fold cross validation method, and the quality of the model was
described by the parameters R2X and Q2 values. Color-coded
correlation coefficient loading plots were employed to indicate the
significance of the metabolite contribution to the class separation
with a “hot” color (e.g., red) being more significant
than a “cold” color (e.g., blue). A cutoff value of
|r| > 0.707 (r > +0.707 and r < −0.707) was chosen for the correlation coefficient
as significant based on the discrimination significance (p ≤ 0.05).The metabolites exhibiting
statistical discrimination between the
DMSO and TCPOBOP-treated WT groups are labeled in the corresponding
color-coded coefficient plots (Figure A,B). Typical 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra and
metabolite assignments of the liver samples are shown in Figure S2. Compared to DMSO-treated WT mice,
the liver NMR spectra demonstrated that levels of lactate, UDP, UDP-glucose,
ketone bodies and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) products, including
succinate, were significantly up-regulated at 48 h with TCPOBOP treatment,
whereas the levels of hepatic glucose, inosine and amino acids were
suppressed. These pattern alterations were not observed in CARKO mice.
Interestingly, at 72 h the level of lactate in TCPOBOP-treated WT
mice was similar to the DMSO-treated WT mice, whereas glutamate was
moderately elevated. The levels of both glucose and amino acids remained
suppressed with the longer time interval TCPOBOP treatment, indicating
that shorter-term TCPOBOP exposure selectively triggers CAR-specific
metabolic responses.
Hepatic mRNA Analysis Related to Glucose
Metabolism
To mechanistically examine CAR’s potential
role as a transcriptional
regulator of glucose metabolism, qPCR analysis was used to assess
hepatic transcript levels for several genes functional in gluconeogenesis
and glycolysis. As previously reported and consistent with the current
data, longer-term treatments with the CAR activators PB and TCPOBOP
inhibited hepatic mRNA levels of Pepck and G6pase in mouse livers.[21] In
addition, our data demonstrated that mRNA expression levels of other
key gluconeogenic enzymes, namely pyruvate carboxylase (Pcx) and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fbp1), were significantly
down-regulated in TCPOBOP-treated WT mice at both 48 and 72 h time
points (Figure A).
There were no significant changes in expression of these transcripts
in the CARKO mice. On the other hand, the expression level of glucokinase
(Gck), the first rate-limiting enzyme in the glycolysis
pathway, converting glucose to glucose-6-phosphate (glucose-6P), was
significantly and selectively up-regulated in WT mice following 48
h of TCPOBOP treatment, levels that then normalized after 72 h of
treatment (Figure B). Interestingly, the transcript level for a downstream enzyme in
glycolysis, phosphofructokinase (Pfkl), was significantly
suppressed in TCPOBOP-treated WT mice at both 48 and 72 h, an effect
that was CAR specific. However, the expression of pyruvate kinase
(Pklr), which converts phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate
in the last step of glycolysis, remained unchanged in both WT and
CARKO mice treated with TCPOBOP when compared to the respective DMSO
controls (Figure B).
Also of note, following TCPOBOP treatment, the hepatic mRNA expression
level of glucose transporter 2 (Glut2), an important
glucose sensor and bidirectional transporter, was significantly down-regulated
in WT mice at both 48 and 72 h, whereas no significant change occurred
in CARKO mice. Importantly, these results imply that CAR functions
to regulate transport of glucose across the cell membrane (Figure C).
Figure 4
TCPOBOP treatment significantly
alters expression of several genes
involved in the transport and metabolism of glucose and monocarboxylic
acids at both 48 and 72 h time points in WT mice alone indicating
CAR specificity. Real-time qPCR was performed to determine the mRNA
expression levels of genes involved in the following pathways: gluconeogenesis
(A), glycolysis (B), glucose transport (C), pentose phosphate pathway
(D), glycogen metabolism (E), pyruvate metabolism (F), and monocarboxylic
transport (G). Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates
± s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups
at each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).
TCPOBOP treatment significantly
alters expression of several genes
involved in the transport and metabolism of glucose and monocarboxylic
acids at both 48 and 72 h time points in WT mice alone indicating
CAR specificity. Real-time qPCR was performed to determine the mRNA
expression levels of genes involved in the following pathways: gluconeogenesis
(A), glycolysis (B), glucose transport (C), pentose phosphate pathway
(D), glycogen metabolism (E), pyruvate metabolism (F), and monocarboxylic
transport (G). Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates
± s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups
at each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).Glucose-6-P, a product of glucose,
is a primary substrate for number
of metabolic pathways, including the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP).[22] Our results show that TCPOBOP-treated WT mice
exhibited significantly higher transcript levels for phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase (Pgd), the second dehydrogenase in
the PPP, whereas expression levels of Pgd in the
CARKO mice were unchanged (Figure D). Glucose-6-P is also the principal substrate and
product for glycogenesis and glycogenolysis, respectively. Glycogen
synthase 2 (Gys2) catalyzes the rate-limiting step
in the synthesis of glycogen from UDP-glucose. Conversely, glycogen
phosphorylase (Pygl) catalyzes the conversion of
glycogen to glucose-6-P. According to the NMR data, levels of UDP-glucose
in the liver increase following treatment with TCPOBOP (Figures A,B). Interestingly, following
CAR activation, Gys2 mRNA expression was significantly
decreased at both 48 and 72 h, whereas Pygl expression
was significantly increased only at 48 h, with no significant changes
noted in CARKO mice (Figure E). These data support CAR’s role as a regulator of
both the synthesis and degradation of glycogen in the maintenance
of energy homeostasis.The NMR data analysis indicated elevated
levels of lactate in the
livers of WT mice 48 h following treatment with TCPOBOP. To determine
a possible mechanism, mRNA expression of genes involved in monocarboxylate
metabolism were investigated. Results clearly demonstrated that TCPOBOP
treatment inhibited the expression of lactate dehydrogenase A (Ldha), which converts pyruvate to lactate in liver, at both
48 and 72 h, but did not alter the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase
beta (Pdhb), responsible for the oxidative decarboxylation
of pyruvate (Figure F). Monocarboxylate transporters 1–4 (Mct) function in the transport of lactate, pyruvate, and ketone bodies
across the cell membranes and are important for maintaining normal
metabolic homeostasis. Of note, in 48 h TCPOBOP-treated WT mice, the
expression of Mct1, whose substrates include l-lactate, pyruvate, hydroxybutyrate, and acetoacetate, was
significantly up-regulated, whereas the expression of Mct2, which has a higher affinity for both pyruvate and lactate than Mct1, was significantly down-regulated (Figure G). In CARKO mice, TCPOBOP
treatments failed to produce significant changes in either Mct1 or Mct2 expression when compared to
their DMSO-treated controls. Thus, the data suggest that CAR functions
to modulate these transporters for maintenance of energy homeostasis
and intracellular pH balance.
Hepatic Fatty Acid Composition
Analysis
The hepatic
fatty acid compositions of the WT and CARKO mice treated with DMSO
or TCPOBOP was determined by GC–MS and the data are presented
in Figure . CAR activation
by TCPOBOP in WT mice led to significantly increased hepatic levels
of several fatty acids, including saturated fatty acids (C16:0 and
C18:0), monosaturated fatty acid (C18:1n9) and polyunsaturated fatty
acid (C18:2), at 48 and 72 h, compared with the DMSO-treated control
group (Figure A).
The concentration of C16:0 was initially increased at 48 h but recovered
to control levels after 72 h (Figure A). No changes in hepatic fatty acid composition were
observed in CARKO mice after short-term treatment with TCPOBOP, indicating
that these changes are CAR specific (Figure B).
Figure 5
GC–MS fatty acid profile of mouse liver
tissue from WT (A)
and CARKO (B) mice treated with DMSO and TCPOBOP at 48 and 72 h time
points. Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates
and standard deviation. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatments
at each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).
GC–MS fatty acid profile of mouse liver
tissue from WT (A)
and CARKO (B) mice treated with DMSO and TCPOBOP at 48 and 72 h time
points. Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates
and standard deviation. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatments
at each time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).
Hepatic mRNA Analysis Related
to Fatty Acid Metabolism
In response to the increased levels
of FAs in the TCPOBOP-treated
WT mouse liver, we examined mRNA transcript levels for several key
enzymes associated with hepatic fatty acid synthesis, beta-fatty acid
oxidation and lipogenesis. Enzymes controlling de novo fatty acid
biosynthesis, specifically fatty acid synthase (Fasn) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (Acaca), exhibited
statistically significant enhanced mRNA levels 48 h after CAR activation
by TCPOBOP. However, the expression levels of Fasn and Acaca were dynamic over time, initially elevated
at 48 h following TCPOBOP treatment and then decreased at 72 h (Figure A). Further, the
mRNA levels for sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (Srebp-1), a key factor regulating the transcription of downstream
targets, Fasn and Acaca, was significantly
decreased in WT mouse livers following TCPOBOP treatment at 48 h and
further reduced at 72 h (Figure B). In addition, expression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1
(Scd-1), a key enzyme in unsaturated fatty acid synthesis,
was significantly decreased in WT mice following 72 h exposure to
TCPOBOP treatment (Figure B). These altered gene expression patterns were not evident
in CARKO mice following TCPOBOP treatment, confirming these responses
as CAR specific.
Figure 6
TCPOBOP treatment significantly alters expression of several
genes
involved in fatty acid metabolism and transport at both 48 and 72
h time points in WT mice alone indicating CAR specificity. Real-time
qPCR was performed to determine the mRNA expression levels of genes
involved in regulating: fatty acid synthesis (A), lipid biosynthesis
and homeostasis (B), and upstream and downstream pathways of β-oxidation
(C). Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates ±
s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups at each
time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).
TCPOBOP treatment significantly alters expression of several
genes
involved in fatty acid metabolism and transport at both 48 and 72
h time points in WT mice alone indicating CAR specificity. Real-time
qPCR was performed to determine the mRNA expression levels of genes
involved in regulating: fatty acid synthesis (A), lipid biosynthesis
and homeostasis (B), and upstream and downstream pathways of β-oxidation
(C). Data are represented as the mean of biological replicates ±
s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups at each
time point indicated by * (p < 0.05).Previous reports speculated that the increase in
TCA intermediates
such as fumarate, malate, and α-ketoglutarate following CAR
activation is a result of increased beta-oxidation of fatty acids,
thus providing increased amounts of acetyl-CoA as fuel for the TCA
cycle.[8] However, TCPOBOP-treated WT mice,
at both 48 and 72 h, exhibited a significant reduction in the expression
of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (Cpt1a), a key
enzyme involved in the carnitine-dependent transport of fatty acids
across the mitochondrial inner membrane, utilized for beta-oxidation
(Figure C). Further,
and possibly as a result of decreased beta-oxidation, HmgCoA synthase
2 (Hmgcs2), an important enzyme regulating the conversion
of acetoacetyl-CoA to beta-hydroxy-B-methylgluctaryl-CoA in the first
step of ketogenesis, was down-regulated in WT mice with CAR activation,
and this effect was CAR specific (Figure C).
Lipid Profiling by UPLC–MS Analysis
in Serum
Initially, our serum GC–MS analysis identified
lowered cholesterol
levels in WT mice following 72 h TCPOBOP treatment, but not in CARKO
mice (data not shown). To further assess the lipid metabolism profile
in serum, we used UPLC–MS analysis to conduct comparative serum
metabolomics profiling in serum harvested from WT mice or CARKO mice
in the absence and presence of TCPOBOP 72 h treatments. Initially,
PCA indicated distinct clustering in the WT mice, but not in CARKO
mice (Figure A and
B). To highlight the metabolic differentials between 72 h DMSO and
TCPOBOP-treated groups in WT or CARKO mice, OPLS-DA was performed.
These analyses resulted in acceptable R2X and Q2 scores (R2X or Q2 > 0.4), but only in WT mice, providing strong support
for
the model quality in this CAR-dependent group, but not for the CARKO
mice (Figure A and 7B).
Figure 7
Serum lipid composition for WT and CARKO mice were determined
using
UPLC–MS. PCA was used to examine differences for both positive
(A) and negative (B) ion modes between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment
group for both WT and CARKO mice at 72 h. OPLS-DA was performed to
determine the quality of each model (R2X and Q2). For WT mice,
lipid class profiles (C) for positive and negative ion modes reveal
altered profiles with TCPOBOP for PC and SM, specifically. Data are
represented as the mean of biological replicates ± s.d. Significance
between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups at each time point indicated
by * (p < 0.05). [Phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylcholine
(PC), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl glyercol (PG),
phosphatidyl inositol (PI), phosphatidyl serine (PS), sphingomyelin
(SM), diacylglycerides (DAG) and triacylycerides (TAG)].
Serum lipid composition for WT and CARKO mice were determined
using
UPLC–MS. PCA was used to examine differences for both positive
(A) and negative (B) ion modes between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment
group for both WT and CARKO mice at 72 h. OPLS-DA was performed to
determine the quality of each model (R2X and Q2). For WT mice,
lipid class profiles (C) for positive and negative ion modes reveal
altered profiles with TCPOBOP for PC and SM, specifically. Data are
represented as the mean of biological replicates ± s.d. Significance
between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment groups at each time point indicated
by * (p < 0.05). [Phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylcholine
(PC), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl glyercol (PG),
phosphatidyl inositol (PI), phosphatidyl serine (PS), sphingomyelin
(SM), diacylglycerides (DAG) and triacylycerides (TAG)].To obtain total changes of lipid composition in
serum, LipidView
software was used for automated data processing and lipid species
identification. We compared total serum lipid classes in the WT mice,
in the absence or presence of 72 h TCPOBOP treatment. The results
revealed that levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sphingomyelin
(SM) lipid classes were significantly decreased in the TCPOBOP-treated
group of WT mice compared with the DMSO group (Figure C). No significant differences were identified
between levels of any other serum lipid in either the TCPOBOP-treated
group or DMSO-control group.
Hepatic mRNA Analysis Related to CAR-Mediated
Alterations in
Lipid Metabolism
To mechanistically assess these CAR-mediated
changes, we evaluated changes in hepatic transcript levels in WT and
CARKO mice for key genes involved in PC and SM biosynthesis and/or
degradation. Short-term TCPOBOP treatment in WT mice significantly
suppressed the expression of choline kinase b (Chkb) and choline phosphotransferase 1 (Chpt1) mRNAs,
responsible for PC synthesis from choline (Figure A). Additional pathways for PC synthesis
derive from phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE) methylation by the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (Pemt) and lyso-PC
reacylation by lyso-PC acyltransferases (Lpcats).
Treatment with TCPOBOP did not effect the expression of Pemt and Lpcats in either WT or CARKO mice (Figure B and C, respectively).
However, CAR activation by TCPOBOP likely enhances PC degradation
in WT mice by increasing the expression of phospholipase A2 group
VI, (Pla2g6) (Figure C). Further, SM is synthesized in the liver by the
transfer of phosphorylcholine from PC to a ceramide in a reaction
catalyzed by sphingomyelin synthases 2 (Sgms2). Our
data indicated that Sgms2 expression significantly
declined after both 48 and 72 h TCPOBOP treatments in WT mice, patterns
not detected in CARKO mice (Figure D).
Figure 8
TCPOBOP treatment significantly alters expression of several
genes
involved in lipid metabolism at both 48 and 72 h time points in WT
mice alone indicating CAR specificity. Real-time qPCR was performed
to determine the mRNA expression levels of genes involved in regulating:
PC synthesis from choline (A) and PE (B), PC reacytilation/degradation
(C) and SM synthesis (D). Data are represented as the mean of biological
replicates ± s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment
groups at each time point indicated by * (p <
0.05).
TCPOBOP treatment significantly alters expression of several
genes
involved in lipid metabolism at both 48 and 72 h time points in WT
mice alone indicating CAR specificity. Real-time qPCR was performed
to determine the mRNA expression levels of genes involved in regulating:
PC synthesis from choline (A) and PE (B), PC reacytilation/degradation
(C) and SM synthesis (D). Data are represented as the mean of biological
replicates ± s.d. Significance between DMSO and TCPOBOP treatment
groups at each time point indicated by * (p <
0.05).
Discussion
It
is increasingly important to recognize CAR’s potential
to impact a myriad of biological responses, including hepatic xenobiotic
and endobiotic metabolism, rodent liver tumor promotion and alterations
in energy and lipid homeostasis. In the current study, we combined
multiple metabolomics analyses with mechanistically targeted gene
expression measures to assess the comparative systems biology of CAR
activation in WT and CARKO transgenic mice. The analyses enabled a
global view of the metabolomics and biological pathway differences
caused by short-term, 48 and 72 h TCPOBOP exposures. As implied by
previous reports, the current results demonstrate that CAR activation
indeed results in marked changes in endocrine biology. However, the
comprehensive metabolomics analyses employed here, together with the
shorter-term CAR activation window, enabled identification of metabolic
profiles in both serum and liver tissues that differ significantly
from previous reports. The results relating to glucose metabolism,
glycolytic pathways, fatty acid metabolism, total lipid and thyroid
hormone regulation are discussed below.
Glucose Metabolism
Results obtained from both NMR and
glucose colorimetric assays demonstrated that glucose levels in both
liver tissue and serum of WT mice were significantly reduced after
48 and 72 h TCPOBOP exposures, and that these effects were CAR-dependent
(Figure and 3). Activation of CAR negatively impacted the liver’s
capacity to generate glucose, similar to the effect of insulin, and
mechanistically these effects result from CAR’s suppression
of gluconeogenic gene expression.[23,24] The results
presented in the current investigation confirm that activation of
CAR with TCPOBOP inhibits transcript expression levels for key enzymes
involved in gluconeogenesis, PCX, PEPCK, FBP1, and G6Pase (Figure ). It was previously
noted that CAR suppresses glucose production by competing with FOXO1,
PGC1 and HNF4A for binding within gluconeogenic gene promoters.[10,11] More recently, it was reported that the ubiquitination and degradation
of PGC-1 facilitated by CAR also contributes to the gluconeogenesis
inhibition.[25]
Figure 9
Several pathways are
involved in energy metabolism and homeostasis
including gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, lipogenesis, fatty acid
synthesis and beta-oxidation. As well, thyroid hormone metabolism
impacts energy homeostasis. Activation of CAR differentially regulates
several genes in these pathways. Red color signifies a measured
increase in mRNA expression in WT mice at 48 and/or 72 h with TCPOBOP,
whereas green indicates a decrease in expression levels.
Several pathways are
involved in energy metabolism and homeostasis
including gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, lipogenesis, fatty acid
synthesis and beta-oxidation. As well, thyroid hormone metabolism
impacts energy homeostasis. Activation of CAR differentially regulates
several genes in these pathways. Red color signifies a measured
increase in mRNA expression in WT mice at 48 and/or 72 h with TCPOBOP,
whereas green indicates a decrease in expression levels.It is noteworthy that our data suggest that increased
expression
of Gck, the first enzyme involved in glycolysis,
together with Pgd, an enzymatic step forwarding to
the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), facilitates an increased consumption
and utilization of glucose following TCPOBOP-mediated CAR activation.
The pentose phosphate pathway utilizes glucose-6-P as its primary
substrate, resulting in the formation of ribose 5-phosphate (R5P) for the synthesis of nucleotides, RNA, and DNA, providing
subsequent support of cell growth and proliferation function, as well
as formation of NADPH for metabolic biosynthetic reactions.[26] Consequently, the current NMR results strongly
support the idea that CAR activation can directly modulate the pentose
phosphate pathway. Consistent with this interpretation are the increased
levels of UDP metabolites detected in WT mice following 48 and 72
h CAR activation with TCPOBOP. UDP metabolites contribute importantly
to galactose glycolysis and other metabolic pathways. In contrast
to the CAR-mediated up-regulation of UDP metabolites, CAR activation
resulted in significantly decreased levels of nicotinamide, hypoxanthine,
and inosine (48 h; Figure ). Further investigation will be required to determine more
specifically CAR’s role in regulating these latter metabolites,
which are involved in nucleotide synthesis downstream of the pentose
phosphate pathway.Following CAR’s activation with TCPOBOP,
transcript expression
levels in liver for the bidirectional transporter and glucose sensor,
Glut2, were significantly decreased in WT mice,
an effect not apparent in CARKO mice. Mechanistically, it appears
likely that this CAR-dependent effect contributes to a reduction in
hepatic glucose uptake, inducing a state of starvation that subsequently
leads to inhibition of glycogenesis and subsequent stimulation of
glycogenolysis. In this scenario, mobilization of glycogen would serve
as a source of energy to compensate for the decreased availability
of hepatic glucose (Figure ). Our qPCR results further revealed that expression of Gys2 was significantly decreased at both the 48 and 72 h
TCPOBOP exposures in WT but not CARKO mice, and that expression of Pygl is significantly increased after 48 h of CAR activation.
Therefore, CAR may function to influence the activity of these genes
by decreasing the expression of protein phosphatase 1, regulatory
subunit 3c (Ppp1r3c), whose activity is known to
activate Gys2, reduce Pygl activity,
and limit glycogen breakdown.[27] Taken together
with the increase in UDP-glucose metabolites, activation of CAR target
genes may direct increased consumption of glycogen, maintaining systemic
energy homeostasis and providing adequate levels of glucose-6-P for
other essential metabolic pathways, including xenobiotic metabolism.Regarding aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis, the NMR data demonstrated
that CAR-specific activation results in significantly increased levels
of lactate, ketone bodies, and the TCA cycle products, particularly
succinate. Pyruvate is the end product of glycolysis and a key substrate
for many metabolic processes, including gluconeogenesis. Through conversion
to acetyl-CoA via aerobic glycolysis, pyruvate provides substrate
for the TCA cycle and fatty acid synthesis.[28] Further, pyruvate can interconvert to lactate or alanine to maintain
energy homeostasis.[28] In this regard, hepatic
lactate levels were elevated in response to acute TCPOBOP treatment
in WT but not CARKO mice. It is likely that elevated lactate results
from the suppression of gluconeogenesis, as effected by CAR activation.
In support of this view, hepatic expression of Ldha, which catalyzes the interconversion of pyruvate and lactate, was
significantly down-regulated following short-term CAR activation with
TCPOBOP. Elevated levels of lactate in WT mice were only observed
at 48 h. Thus, acute CAR activation may also mediate the transport
of lactate, pyruvate and ketone bodies across the cell membrane, resulting
from enhanced Mct1 and decreased Mct2 expression, contributing to short-term normalization of these hepatic
substrate levels (Figure ).
Fatty Acid Metabolism
In addition
to CAR’s effects
on glucose levels and glycolytic pathways, activation of the receptor
resulted in significant alterations in fatty acid metabolism. Fatty
acids may be broken down to acetyl-CoA following β-oxidation
to provide fuel for the TCA cycle and other metabolic processes. Dong
et al. reported that treatment with TCPOBOP for one month improved
hepatic steatosis by inhibiting hepatic lipogenesis and inducing β-oxidation.[8] In a separate study, low density lipoprotein
receptor (LDLR)-deficient mice treated with TCPOBOP exhibited a decrease
in plasma cholesterol and triglycerides level.[9] Conversely, another report indicated that CAR activation in mice
contributed to increased serum triglycerides and suppression of liver
β-oxidation.[29] Our GC–MS fatty
acid analysis of liver tissue revealed that treatment with TCPOBOP
for 48 or 72 h increased specific hepatic fatty acid levels (C16:0,
C18:0, C18:1n9, and C18:2) selectively in WT mice. In this respect,
RNA expression for genes involved in fatty acid synthesis, Fasn and Acaca, was significantly increased
at 48 h in WT mice, whereas RNA levels of Cpt1a,
an important enzyme involved in the mitochondrial transport of FAs
for β-oxidation, were decreased at both time points. Further,
transcript levels for enzymes involved in downstream metabolic processes,
such as ketogenesis (Hmgcs2) and de novo lipogenesis
(Scd1 and Srebp1c), were significantly
decreased by CAR activation, in WT but not CARKO mice (Figure ). Interestingly, others reported
that Srebp-1 affects non-DNA binding domains of PXR
and CAR, inhibiting the receptors’ transcriptional activities
through prevention of their respective interaction with nuclear coregulators.[30] Our results indicate that CAR activation suppresses Srebp-1 transcription, predicted to diminish lipogenesis,
but also enhance fatty acid synthesis (Figure ). Thus, the mechanistic interplay of multiple
pathways likely accounts for CAR’s regulation of fatty acid
metabolism.The effects of CAR activation in vivo appear to
involve both acute and chronic metabolic regulation. In liver tissues,
acute xenobiotic stress often results in transient, adaptive hepatomegaly
and chronic CAR activation appears to significantly minimize this
impact, reducing fatty liver histology.[8] In our studies, WT mice analyzed either 48 or 72 h following treatment
with a single dose of TCPOBOP exhibited fatty acid metabolic patterns
consistent with acute morphologic hepatic alterations. In addition,
hepatic gene expression assays detected corresponding alterations
for key fatty acid metabolism pathways that likely contribute mechanistically
to the elevated hepatic FA levels observed in TCPOBOP-treated WT mice.
Although physiologically complex, these effects likely underlie the
alterations in liver to body weight ratios we noted in our study (Figure ).
Total Lipid
Metabolism
Other investigators previously
reported that CAR activation in mice decreased serum cholesterol and
triglycerides.[31] To assess the basis of
these effects, the metabolomics approaches used here enabled analysis
of CAR’s role as an integral regulator of total lipid metabolism,
especially phospholipid metabolism.[32] Analysis
of serum lipid profiles in WT mice indicated that levels of phosphatidylcholine
and sphingomyelin were significantly reduced following short-term
TCPOBOP exposure. The majority of PC is obtained from choline,
by catalysis of choline kinase a and b (Chka/b) and
choline phosphotransferase 1 (Chpt1), via the CDP-choline
pathway.[33] Phosphatidylcholine is also
produced by reacylation of lyso-PC via fatty acid remodeling, where
in a bidirectional reaction, lyso-PC acyltransferases (Lpcats) catalyze reacylation at the sn-2 position of LPC using acyl-CoA,
while the phospholipases A2s (Pla2s) release fatty
acid from the sn-2 position of PC.[34−36] Further, approximately
30 percent of liver PC is synthesized by sequential methylation
of PE by the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase
(Pemt).[33,37−39] Our results indicate that the effect of CAR activation on the levels
of PC are principally mediated by two PC pathways. One involves decreasing
PC synthesis by suppressing Chpt1and Chkb, while the other relates to acceleration of PC degradation
through enhanced expression of the Pla2s, such
as Pla2g6. CAR activation did not alter
the expression of Pemt and Lpcat 3/4, indicating that down-regulated PC was not resulting from the reacylation
of lyso-PC and methylation of PE (Figure ).Production of SM involves the transfer
of phosphocholine from PC to ceramide. There are two Sgms isoforms identified in humans, Sgms1 and Sgms2, that contribute to SM synthesis.[40] We focused our investigation on the expression of Sgms2, as it is expressed predominantly in liver. The results
demonstrated that hepatic Sgms2 expression was abrogated
by short-term CAR activation. Therefore, the reduction of serum SM
levels observed here is likely a consequence of decreased SM synthesis
and reduced availability of PC in the liver.
Thyroid Hormone Metabolism
It is important to consider
the effect of CAR activation on thyroid hormones (TH) since TH is
a key regulator of energy disposition, influencing hepatic lipid,
cholesterol and carbohydrate metabolism. Reportedly, with CAR activation,
3-5-3′-5′-tetaidothyronine (T4) serum levels decrease,
whereas 3-3-5′-triiodothyronine (T3), the more active form
that binds to the thyroid hormone receptor (TR), is unaffected.[41,42] Type 1 deiodinase (Dio1), a gene encodign a major
enzyme responsible for the conversion of T4 into active T3 in the
liver, catalyzes the conversion of T3 into T2 for clearance, and is
a CAR regulated.[23,43] In addition, through regulation
of Phase II enzymes, CAR influences TH homeostasis via glucoronosyl
transferases (UGT1A1, 2B1) and sulfotransferase (SULT1a1).[41,42] In accord with these published results, in our studies WT mice treated
with TCPOBOP demonstrated increased mRNA expression of Dio1 at 48 h as well as increased expression of Ugt1a1, at both 48 and 72 h, events likely enhancing the transformation,
degradation and clearance of T4 (Figure S1B and S3A). Importantly, the expression of monocarboxylic transporter
8 (Mct8), which preferentially transports thyroid
hormones across cell membranes, was significantly decreased with TCPOBOP
treatment, specifically in WT mice (Figure S3B). Further, CAR is projected to compete with TR for their mutual
heterodimerization partner, RXRα, and nuclear coregulators,
to regulate gene expression.[44] Taken collectively,
activated CAR may inhibit the effect of TH both by reducing its availability
and its ability to interact with target genes in the liver.
Conclusion
Through extensive analysis of metabolomics and gene expression
data, our investigation substantiates the essential role for CAR in
energy metabolism, through CAR’s regulation of pathways mediating
the metabolism of glucose, lipids and fatty acids. These broad aspects
of CAR’s modulation of the energy metabolome provide insight
and therapeutic relevance for liver diseases such as steatohepatitis
and diabetes. One issue that arises is the relevance of TCPOBOP, a
synthetic CAR ligand, used as a model CAR activator in the current
study. Several other modes of CAR activation are of functional consequence.
Early reports demonstrated that CAR is a regulator of thyroid metabolism
during caloric restriction[41] and that CAR
regulates serum triglyceride levels under conditions of metabolic
stress.[29] More recently, the discovery
that CAR activation can be modulated through the epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway underscores further endogenous
modes of CAR regulation.[45] This pathway
is also of relevance to human xenobiotic exposures. For example, certain polychlorinated
biphenyls disrupt EGFR signaling, and these exposures are associated
with toxicant-induced steatohepatitis.[46,47] It is likely
that other classes of toxicants also perturb these signaling pathways
and effect CAR function. The underlying molecular mechanisms regulating
energy metabolism by CAR involve cross-talk with other nuclear receptors,
including PXR, LXR, FXR, PPAR and TH, as well as the interactions
with insulin- or glucagon-responsive transcription factors such as
HNF4α, C/EBPα, PGC-1, and FOXO1. CAR interplays with these
transcription factors, altering the concerted regulation of hepatic
genes that encode key enzymes in energy metabolism. Our own ChIP-exo
investigations further demonstrate that within mouse liver, activated
CAR binds directly to loci of several genes associated with energy
metabolism, including Gck, Fbp1 and Ldha.[48] Additional investigations
are ultimately required to validate these and other CAR targets and
to more thoroughly integrate CAR’s role as a key biological
regulator of energy metabolism.
Authors: Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Bingning Dong; Pradip K Saha; Wendong Huang; Wenling Chen; Lutfi A Abu-Elheiga; Salih J Wakil; Robert D Stevens; Olga Ilkayeva; Christopher B Newgard; Lawrence Chan; David D Moore Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fikadu Geta Tafesse; Klazien Huitema; Martin Hermansson; Seléne van der Poel; Joep van den Dikkenberg; Andreas Uphoff; Pentti Somerharju; Joost C M Holthuis Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-04-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J J Schlezinger; T Hyötyläinen; T Sinioja; C Boston; H Puckett; J Oliver; W Heiger-Bernays; T F Webster Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 4.460