| Literature DB >> 30335760 |
Emily A Melchior1, Jason K Smith1, Liesel G Schneider1, J Travis Mulliniks1, Gary E Bates2, Zachary D McFarlane1, Michael D Flythe3, James L Klotz3, Jack P Goodman4, Huihua Ji5, Phillip R Myer1.
Abstract
Negative impacts of endophyte-infected Lolium arundinaceum (Darbyshire) (tall fescue) are responsible for over $2 billion in losses to livestock producers annually. While the influence of endophyte-infected tall fescue has been studied for decades, mitigation methods have not been clearly elucidated. Isoflavones found in Trifolium pratense (red clover) have been the subject of recent research regarding tall fescue toxicosis mitigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of ergovaline and red clover isoflavones on rumen microbial populations, fiber degradation, and volatile fatty acids (VFA) in an in vitro system. Using a dose of 1.10 mg × L-1, endophyte-infected or endophyte-free tall fescue seed was added to ANKOM fiber bags with or without 2.19 mg of isoflavones in the form of a control, powder, or pulverized tablet, resulting in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangements of treatments. Measurements of pH, VFA, bacterial taxa, as well as the disappearance of neutral detergent fiber (aNDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and crude protein (CP) were taken after 48 h of incubation. aNDF disappearance values were significantly altered by seed type (P = 0.003) and isoflavone treatment (P = 0.005), and ADF disappearance values were significantly different in a seed × isoflavone treatment interaction (P ≤ 0.05). A seed × isoflavone treatment interaction was also observed with respect to CP disappearance (P ≤ 0.05). Eighteen bacterial taxa were significantly altered by seed × isoflavone treatment interaction groups (P ≤ 0.05), eight bacterial taxa were increased by isoflavones (P ≤ 0.05), and ten bacterial taxa were altered by seed type (P ≤ 0.05). Due to the beneficial effect of isoflavones on tall fescue seed fiber degradation, these compounds may be viable options for mitigating fescue toxicosis. Further research should be conducted to determine physiological implications as well as microbiological changes in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30335760 PMCID: PMC6193618 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effects of isoflavones and fescue seed type on neutral detergent fiber (aNDFD), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and crude protein (CP) disappearance after rumen fluid incubation (48 h).
| Measurement (%) | Isoflavone Treatment | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Powder | Tablet | |||||||||
| Fescue Seed | |||||||||||
| E+ | E- | E+ | E- | E+ | E- | Seed | Isoflavone Treatment | Seed × Isoflavone Treatment | |||
| 9.11 | 12.52 | 12.72 | 15.84 | 12.74 | 13.68 | 1.24 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.432 | ||
| 1.72 | 3.21 | 7.01 | 2.19 | 1.27 | 5.91 | 1.03 | 0.36 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | ||
| 2.44 | 12.23 | 6.98 | 7.33 | 4.01 | 9.08 | 0.93 | < 0.001 | 0.689 | 0.0002 | ||
1Treatment: control, isoflavone powder, or isoflavone pulverized tablet.
2Seed type: KY 31 endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue seed, KY 32 endophyte-free (E-) tall fescue seed.
abcd Within an isoflavone treatment, seed types with like superscripts are not different at P = 0.05
Effects of isoflavones and fescue seed type on volatile fatty acid concentrations in the fluid phase of an in vitro rumen fluid digestion (48 h).
| VFA | Isoflavone Treatment | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Powder | Tablet | |||||||||
| Fescue Seed | |||||||||||
| E+ | E- | E+ | E- | E+ | E- | Seed | Isoflavone Treatment | Seed × Isoflavone Treatment | |||
| 23.55 | 20.00 | 19.66 | 17.98 | 21.84 | 17.90 | 2.73 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.86 | ||
| 55.22 | 59.29 | 57.85 | 58.85 | 56.38 | 58.39 | 2.08 | 0.14 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||
| 35.24 | 31.23 | 31.15 | 30.78 | 34.23 | 31.30 | 2.38 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.56 | ||
| 7.94 | 7.88 | 9.58 | 8.06 | 7.07 | 8.81 | 1.12 | 0.95 | 0.52 | 0.28 | ||
| 1.48 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 1.16 | 0.91 | 1.30 | 0.50 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.81 | 1.05 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.68 | ||
| 1.60 | 1.97 | 1.90 | 1.99 | 1.73 | 1.98 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 0.73 | ||
1Treatment: control, isoflavone powder, or isoflavone pulverized tablet.
2Seed type: KY 31 endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue seed, KY 32 endophyte-free (E-) tall fescue seed.
3 Concentration in mMol
4 Concentration in mMol×100mMol-1.
5IVMB: Isovalerate/methylbutyrate
Fig 1Shannon’s Diversity Index box plot of bacterial species diversity across treatment groups.
Group 1: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed. Group 2: endophyte-free tall fescue seed. Group 3: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 4: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet. Group 5: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 6: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet.
Fig 2NMDS ordination plot grouped by treatment.
Points represent taxa within treatment groups. Similar clustering indicates similar taxa within treatment groups. Group 1: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed. Group 2: endophyte-free tall fescue seed. Group 3: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 4: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet. Group 5: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 6: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet.
Fig 3NMDS ordination plot indicating significant taxa at the genus level that influenced major bacterial shifts among treatments.
Fig 4Taxonomic profiles of the relative proportions of bacterial communities by genus, grouped by treatment.
Group 1: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed. Group 2: endophyte-free tall fescue seed. Group 3: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 4: endophyte-infected tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet. Group 5: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone powder. Group 6: endophyte-free tall fescue seed with isoflavone tablet. No significant differences among groups (P > 0.1).
Effects of isoflavones and fescue seed type on relative abundance of significant in vitro rumen bacterial taxa.
| Classification | Percentage of total sequences | Effect | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | |||||||||
| Control | Powder | Tablet | |||||||
| Fescue Seed | |||||||||
| E+ | E- | E+ | E- | E+ | E- | ||||
| 0.0011 | ND | 0.013 | 0.0027 | 0.012 | 0.019 | Treatment | 0.0047 | 0.018 | |
| 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.0255 | ND | 0.0203 | 0.037 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0071 | 0.020 | |
| 0.054 | 0.067 | 0.0233 | 0.075 | 0.044 | 0.108 | Seed × Treatment | 0.019 | 0.037 | |
| 0.074 | 0.014 | 0.244 | 0.104 | 0.158 | 0.096 | Seed | 0.0447 | 0.027 | |
| 0.928 | 0.277 | 1.44 | 2.34 | 1.39 | 0.574 | Seed × Treatment | 0.2937 | 0.015 | |
| 4.06 | 5.56 | 5.54 | 4.16 | 4.23 | 5.49 | Seed × Treatment | 0.4920 | 0.015 | |
| 8.77 | 13.96 | 12.62 | 10.11 | 11.26 | 11.58 | Seed × Treatment | 0.8247 | 0.001 | |
| 0.079 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.086 | 0.096 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0219 | 0.019 | |
| 0.81 | 1.61 | 0.742 | 0.801 | 0.721 | 0.941 | Seed | 0.1092 | 0.031 | |
| 3.33 | 5.60 | 4.18 | 3.92 | 3.22 | 3.98 | Seed × Treatment | 0.2961 | 0.039 | |
| 0.041 | 0.065 | 0.131 | 0.109 | 0.066 | 0.076 | Seed | 0.0014 | 0.009 | |
| ND | 0.0115 | ND | 0.0015 | 0.0015 | 0.0056 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0024 | 0.007 | |
| 0.018 | 0.06 | 0.056 | 0.013 | 0.043 | 0.083 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0152 | 0.006 | |
| 0.117 | 0.018 | 0.0411 | 0.0431 | 0.0344 | 0.0286 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0502 | 0.008 | |
| ND | 0.0014 | 0.0043 | 0.0042 | ND | ND | Treatment | 0.0051 | 0.020 | |
| 0.027 | 0.065 | 0.109 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.456 | Treatment | 0.3030 | 0.009 | |
| 0.0092 | 0.0012 | 0.0142 | 0.0029 | 0.027 | 0.0088 | Seed | 0.0038 | 0.030 | |
| 0.0292 | 0.148 | 0.053 | 0.038 | 0.034 | 0.039 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0233 | 0.021 | |
| 0.028 | 0.103 | 0.047 | 0.071 | 0.063 | 0.071 | Seed | 0.0134 | 0.004 | |
| 0.0069 | ND | ND | 0.0146 | 0.0063 | 0.0044 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0033 | 0.011 | |
| 0.0578 | 0.0088 | 0.0024 | 0.0278 | 0.0373 | 0.0162 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0094 | 0.003 | |
| 0.066 | 0.196 | 0.0811 | 0.125 | 0.0677 | 0.103 | Seed | 0.0192 | 0.019 | |
| 0.095 | 0.0014 | 0.0044 | 0.0118 | 0.007 | 0.0136 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0168 | 0.010 | |
| 1.45 | 0.223 | 2.25 | 1.29 | 1.27 | 1.35 | Seed | 0.1770 | 0.011 | |
| 0.097 | 0.027 | 0.0203 | 0.0069 | 0.124 | 0.0148 | Seed | 0.0203 | 0.037 | |
| 0.157 | 0.196 | 0.272 | 0.192 | 0.263 | 0.378 | Treatment | 0.0332 | 0.021 | |
| 0.496 | 0.237 | 1.11 | 0.831 | 1.24 | 0.681 | Treatment | 0.1568 | 0.020 | |
| 2.18 | 3.45 | 2.75 | 2.04 | 2.20 | 2.66 | Seed × Treatment | 0.1852 | 0.002 | |
| 0.0334 | 0.0087c | 0.0766 | 0.079 | 0.065 | 0.060 | Treatment | 0.0108 | 0.004 | |
| 0.219 | 0.159 | 0.459 | 0.629 | 0.543 | 0.514 | Treatment | 0.0842 | 0.012 | |
| 0.230 | 0.0901 | 0.903 | 0.950 | 0.954 | 0.607 | Treatment | 0.236 | 0.0104 | |
| 0.672 | 1.67 | 0.662 | 0.774 | 0.627 | 0.632 | Seed × Treatment | 0.191 | 0.0349 | |
| 0.002 | 0.014 | ND | 0.004 | 0.0015 | 0.0088 | Seed | 0.1670 | 0.027 | |
| 1.21 | 1.01 | 2.43 | 1.32 | 2.14 | 2.07 | Seed | 0.2967 | 0.008 | |
| 0.0078 | ND | ND | 0.0028 | ND | 0.0031 | Seed × Treatment | 0.0011 | < 0.001 | |
| 0.445 | 0.797 | 0.865 | 0.709 | 0.722 | 1.31 | Seed × Treatment | 0.153 | < 0.001 | |
1 Data reported as LSMeans
2 Treatment: control, isoflavone powder, or isoflavone pulverized tablet
3 Seed type: KY 31 endophyte infected (E+) tall fescue seed, KY 32 endophyte-free (E-) tall fescue seed
4Within a row, differences between treatment groups are considered significant at P ≤ 0.05, and trending toward significance at P ≤ 0.10
abcd Different means separation letters within a row indicate significant differences among LSMeans