OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that uranium miners in New Mexico (NM) have a greater prevalence of cardiovascular disease than miners who extracted non-uranium ore. METHODS: NM-based current and former uranium miners were compared to non-uranium miners by using cross-sectional standardized questionnaire data from the Mining Dust in the United States (MiDUS) study from 1989 to 2016. RESULTS: Of the 7,215 eligible miners, most were men (96.3%). Uranium miners (n = 3,151, 43.7%) were older and diabetic, but less likely to currently smoke or use snuff (p ≤ 0.001 for all). After adjustment for covariates, uranium miners were more likely to report angina (O.R. 1.51, 95% C.I. 1.23, 1.85) than non-uranium miners. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that along with screening for pulmonary diseases, uranium industry workers should be screened for cardiovascular diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that uranium miners in New Mexico (NM) have a greater prevalence of cardiovascular disease than miners who extracted non-uranium ore. METHODS: NM-based current and former uranium miners were compared to non-uranium miners by using cross-sectional standardized questionnaire data from the Mining Dust in the United States (MiDUS) study from 1989 to 2016. RESULTS: Of the 7,215 eligible miners, most were men (96.3%). Uranium miners (n = 3,151, 43.7%) were older and diabetic, but less likely to currently smoke or use snuff (p ≤ 0.001 for all). After adjustment for covariates, uranium miners were more likely to report angina (O.R. 1.51, 95% C.I. 1.23, 1.85) than non-uranium miners. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that along with screening for pulmonary diseases, uranium industry workers should be screened for cardiovascular diseases.
Authors: Tamara V Azizova; Colin R Muirhead; Maria B Moseeva; Evgenia S Grigoryeva; Elena V Vlasenko; Nezahat Hunter; Richard G E Haylock; Jacqueline A O'Hagan Journal: Health Phys Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Nicola S Russell; Saske Hoving; Sylvia Heeneman; J Joris Hage; Leonie A E Woerdeman; Remco de Bree; Peter J F M Lohuis; Ludi Smeele; Jack Cleutjens; Addy Valenkamp; Lucille D A Dorresteijn; Otilia Dalesio; Mat J Daemen; Fiona A Stewart Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Michaela Kreuzer; Anssi Auvinen; Elisabeth Cardis; Janet Hall; Jean-Rene Jourdain; Dominique Laurier; Mark P Little; Annette Peters; Ken Raj; Nicola S Russell; Soile Tapio; Wei Zhang; Maria Gomolka Journal: Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 5.657
Authors: Tyler A Beach; Carl J Johnston; Angela M Groves; Jacqueline P Williams; Jacob N Finkelstein Journal: Exp Lung Res Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Alice M Shumate; Kristin Yeoman; Tristan Victoroff; Kandace Evans; Roger Karr; Tami Sanchez; Akshay Sood; Anthony Scott Laney Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.162