Simultaneous recovery of calcium phosphate granules (CaP granules) and methane in anaerobic treatment of source separated black water (BW) has been previously demonstrated. The exact mechanism behind the accumulation of calcium phosphate (Ca x(PO4) y) in CaP granules during black water treatment was investigated in this study by examination of the interface between the outer anaerobic biofilm and the core of CaP granules. A key factor in this process is the pH profile in CaP granules, which increases from the edge (7.4) to the center (7.9). The pH increase enhances supersaturation for Ca x(PO4) y phases, creating internal conditions preferable for Ca x(PO4) y precipitation. The pH profile can be explained by measured bioconversion of acetate and H2, HCO3- and H+ into CH4 in the outer biofilm and eventual stripping of CO2 and CH4 (biogas) from the granule. Phosphorus content and Ca x(PO4) y crystal mass quantity in the granules positively correlated with the granule size, in the reactor without Ca2+ addition, indicating that the phosphorus rich core matures with the granule growth. Adding Ca2+ increased the overall phosphorus content in granules >0.4 mm diameter, but not in fine particles (<0.4 mm). Additionally, H+ released from aqueous phosphate species during Ca x(PO4) y crystallization were buffered by internal hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and stripping of biogas from the granule. These insights into the formation and growth of CaP granules are important for process optimization, enabling simultaneous Ca x(PO4) y and CH4 recovery in a single reactor. Moreover, the biological induction of Ca x(PO4) y crystallization resulting from biological increase of pH is relevant for stimulation and control of (bio)crystallization and (bio)mineralization in real environmental conditions.
Simultaneous recovery of calcium phosphate granules (CaP granules) and methane in anaerobic treatment of source separated black water (BW) has been previously demonstrated. The exact mechanism behind the accumulation of calcium phosphate (Ca x(PO4) y) in CaP granules during black water treatment was investigated in this study by examination of the interface between the outer anaerobic biofilm and the core of CaP granules. A key factor in this process is the pH profile in CaP granules, which increases from the edge (7.4) to the center (7.9). The pH increase enhances supersaturation for Ca x(PO4) y phases, creating internal conditions preferable for Ca x(PO4) y precipitation. The pH profile can be explained by measured bioconversion of acetate and H2, HCO3- and H+ into CH4 in the outer biofilm and eventual stripping of CO2 and CH4 (biogas) from the granule. Phosphorus content and Ca x(PO4) y crystal mass quantity in the granules positively correlated with the granule size, in the reactor without Ca2+ addition, indicating that the phosphorus rich core matures with the granule growth. Adding Ca2+ increased the overall phosphorus content in granules >0.4 mm diameter, but not in fine particles (<0.4 mm). Additionally, H+ released from aqueous phosphate species during Ca x(PO4) y crystallization were buffered by internal hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and stripping of biogas from the granule. These insights into the formation and growth of CaP granules are important for process optimization, enabling simultaneous Ca x(PO4) y and CH4 recovery in a single reactor. Moreover, the biological induction of Ca x(PO4) y crystallization resulting from biological increase of pH is relevant for stimulation and control of (bio)crystallization and (bio)mineralization in real environmental conditions.
Phosphorus (P) is an
essential, irreplaceable, and scarce element
for humanity.[1,2] Therefore, phosphate (PO43–) recovery from waste streams is an important
measure to reduce P scarcity and to minimize eutrophication, which
is associated with P discharge to natural water bodies.Current
technologies for P recovery focus on precipitation/crystallization
of calcium phosphate species (Ca(PO4)) and struvite (MgNH4PO4·6H2O) from P enriched side streams
of industrial and municipal wastewater treatment plants.[2] Struvite can be applied as a slow release fertilizer,
but other application options, such as raw material for the phosphorus
industry, are limited by the presence of magnesium (Mg) and ammonia.[3] Alternatively, although Ca(PO4) has a limited
application as a direct fertilizer due to its low solubility in water,
it can replace mined P in both the phosphate and fertilizer industry.[3−5]Calcium phosphate (CaP) granules were observed for the first
time
in the sludge bed of a lab scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB)
reactor, treating vacuum collected black water (BW) without addition
of chemicals.[5] Yet, although 51–56%
was retained in the UASB reactor, only 2–8% of the total incoming
P was found as CaP granules.[5,6] An increase of soluble
calcium (Ca2+) and a decrease of bicarbonate (HCO3–) in BW enhanced the accumulation of P in the
UASB reactor (PO43– removal).[6] By supplementing at least 250 mgCa2+ L–1BW to the UASB reactor, the P sampled
as CaP granules (>0.4 mm diameter) was enhanced from 2 to 31% and
the P accumulation from 51 to 89% of the total incoming P.[7] However, a significant fraction of P (58%) was
still present as fine particles (<0.4 mm diameter), which are unfeasible
to recover. Therefore, more understanding of the mechanism behind
formation and growth of CaP granules is essential to stimulate granule
formation, enabling simultaneous recovery of Ca(PO4) and methane (CH4) during anaerobic treatment of BW. Additionally, it can give
insights into the application of this process to other wastewater
streams, such as manure.Formation of Ca(PO4) in the granules
does not necessarily start
with the most stable phase thermodynamically, but with phases which
require less energy of formation. Formation of hydroxyapatite (HAP),
which is the thermodynamic most stable Ca(PO4) phase, occurs gradually
via precursor phases, such as amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) and
octacalcium phosphate (OPC). ACP and OCP are less stable and, therefore,
precipitate first.[8−12] Parameters, such as pH and Ca2+ and PO43– ionic activities, influence the saturation state
of Ca(PO4) phases.[13] Since the pH and Ca2+ and PO43– concentrations in
BW are dictated by the dilution factor during BW collection and by
the treatment conditions, the chemical speciation in the interphase
between bulk liquid of the reactor and CaP granule is crucial to understand
the enrichment of Ca(PO4) in the granules. For instance, syntrophic
production and consumption of hydrogen (H2) by acidifiers,
acetogens, and hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the biofilm, which
surrounds the Ca(PO4) core, could induce a local increase in pH,
due to the conversion of H2, protons (H+) and
HCO3– into CH4.[14,15] This would favor Ca(PO4) enrichment of the granules over bulk precipitation.In this study, pH as a function of granule depth, biological activity,
chemical composition, and structural and crystal properties of CaP
granules are experimentally assessed and correlated with the granule
size. The goal is to describe the mechanism behind the desired formation
of Ca(PO4) in CaP granules over bulk precipitation. Additionally, the
biological impact of the outer biofilm on crystallization of HAP is
modeled by correlating the biological production and consumption of
HCO3– and H+ with crystallization
of HAP from ACP and OCP phases in CaP granules.
Experimental Section
pH Microelectrode
Measurements
The internal pH profile
of 11 CaP granules (>2.0 mm diameter) was analyzed with a 25 μm
microelectrode (Unisense, Denmark) coupled with a reference electrode
model ref-RM (Unisense, Denmark). The source of granules for the pH
measurements was the laboratory scale 50 L UASB reactor previously
described in Tervahauta et al. (2014b), which was run until the end
of 2015. The pH measurements and specific methanogenic activities
(described further) were done in the second half of 2014 which corresponds
to the period between operation days 1005 and 1188 of the 50 L UASB
reactor. The reactor operated at 25 °C, at an organic loading
rate (OLR) of 0.8 ± 0.5 kgCOD m–3 d–1 and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 11 ± 3 days, resulting
in an upflow velocity of 0.6 cm h–1 and a solids
retention time (SRT) of more than 250 days. Granules were separated
by fluidization using a polyvinyl chloride upflow column, with 1 cm
diameter and 1 m height. The upflow velocity was 57 m h–1 for 6 min to separate granules from flocculent sludge, using paper
filtered effluent from the same 50 L UASB reactor as mobile phase.
The shear applied by the upflow velocity enhanced the removal of weakly
attached flocculent sludge from the granules. Thus, only granules
with strongly bound biofilm were used. The details of the procedure
and chemical and physical characteristics of each fraction are described
in the Supporting Information (S1). Granules
retained in the column were used for the pH measurements. During the
pH measurements, oxygen-free effluent from the 50 L UASB reactor was
used again as mobile phase to avoid transport and dissolution of substances
from the granule to the mobile phase. Temperature and pH were controlled
at 25 ± 0.2 °C and 7.5 ± 0.02, respectively. The data
was acquired using a pH meter PHM210 (Radiometer analytical SAS, France),
an A/D converter ADC-216 (Unisense, Denmark) and the software Profix
3.10 (Unisense, Denmark), which set the motion of the sensor and logged
the data simultaneously. The motion of the sensor was controlled in
three axis using a two-dimensional stage MT-65 (Phytron Inc., Williston,
VT) and a motorized micromanipulator MM3M (Unisense, Denmark), which
controlled the vertical motion. The calibration was performed using
buffers at pH 7 and 9 (VWR International S.A.S., France) at 25 °C.
Modeling of Saturation State of Ca(PO4) Phases and Calcite
The saturation states of HAP, precursors ACP and OCP, and calcite
in function of the local pH in the granules were calculated using
the software Visual MINTEQ version 3.1 (KTH, Sweden). This software
uses the Davies equation to calculate activity coefficients,[16] while taking into account the measured chemical
composition of BW (g L–1): 0.87 NH4+, 0.01 Mg2+, 0.35 Na+, 0.23 K+, 0.5 × 10–3 Fe2+, 0.05 Ca2+, 2.36 HCO3–, 0.46 Cl–, 0.04 SO42–, 0.7 × 10–3 NO3– and 0.16 PO43–. Methods used for the chemical measurements were as described in
Cunha et al. (2017).[6] Humic substances,
which are known to interact with Ca2+ and PO43–,[17] were included
using the complexation model available in the software used; the entering
parameters were total dissolved organic carbon (determined by Shimadzu
TOC analyzer, 1.3 gC L–1) and dissolved humic acids
(136 mgC L–1). The latter were measured with liquid
chromatography–organic carbon detection (LC-OCD, Model 8 with
a NDIR-detector Siemens Ultramat 6E and UV and OND detectors
Agilent 1260 Infinity). The temperature was set at 25 °C and
pH was defined according to the obtained pH depth profile. Then, the
saturation state (SI) of each specie (y) was defined by eq .where IAP is
the ion activity product of the elements in y and Ksp is the solubility product
constant of y. For SI > 0 y is supersaturated,
for
SI < 0 y is undersaturated and for SI = 0 y is in apparent equilibrium.
Specific Methanogenic Activity
Tests of CaP Granules
CaP granules used for the specific
methanogenic activity tests were
also harvested from the previously mentioned 50 L UASB reactor.[5] Granules separated by fluidization in the upflow
column above-described were used for the specific methanogenic activity
tests, which were performed at 25 °C in triplicate according
to Angelidaki et al. (2007).[18] Then, Acetate
(1 g L–1) and H2/CO2 (1 bar
overpressure 80/20) were separately used as substrate to determine
the activity of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic microorganisms,
respectively. Serum bottles (250 mL) were used with a working liquid
volume of approximately 125 mL (weight corrections were done for each
bottle). The concentration of inoculum was 2.3 ± 0.5 gVSS L–1. Control (without substrate) and blank (only substrate)
tests were performed in duplicate. Macronutrients and micronutrients
stock solutions were prepared according to Angelidaki et al. (2007).[18] Sørensen buffer was used to control the
operational pH at 7.4. CH4 production was measured by means
of pressure using a manometer GMH 3150–EX (Greisinger electronic,
Germany). The composition of headspace gas was determined using gas
chromatography (Varian CP4900 Micro GC with two separate column models
Mol Sieve 5 Å PLOT (MS5) and PoraPLOT U (PPU)) and the acetate
concentration using ion chromatography (Metrohm 761 Compact). Specific
methanogenic activity (SMA) rates were calculated for all the tests
according to Angelidaki et al. (2007).[18] For the tests with H2/CO2 the partial pressure
of CH4 (PCH) was
quantified according to eq .where ΔPtotal is the pressure variation measured with manometer, and n is the partial proportions for anaerobic CH4 production
from H2/CO2, which is assumed 1 for standard
temperature and pressure conditions.
Particle Size Distribution
(PSD), Elemental Composition and
X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)
PSD, elemental analysis
and XRD measurements were performed on CaP granules from two 5 L UASB
reactors treating BW. The vacuum collected black water used as influent
for all UASB reactors was collected in the same community in Sneek
(The Netherlands), but at different periods.[7] Reactor 1 was a control reactor with the similar operation as the
50 L UASB reactor used for the micro pH measurements and methanogenic
activity tests. Reactor 2 was used to study the effect of Ca2+ addition on CaP granulation.[7] Both 5
L reactors, without and with Ca2+ addition, operated for
460 days at 25 °C and at an OLR of 1.2 ± 0.3 and 1.4 ±
0.4 kgCOD m–3 d–1 and HRT of 8
± 1 and 7 ± 1 days, respectively. These conditions resulted
in an upflow velocity of 0.4 cm h–1 for both reactors
and SRT of 163 and 186 days for reactor without and with Ca2+ addition, respectively. Sludge samples (55 mL) were sampled on operation
days 350, 415, 436, and 460 at three different heights from top to
bottom (20, 10, and 5 cm), using a syringe connected to a hose with
0.5 cm diameter. Results are presented as an average of the four sampling
occasions.PSD was analyzed with mesh sieves, dividing particles
in the sludge samples as <0.4, 0.4–0.9, 0.9–1.4,
1.4–2.0, 2.0–2.5, and >2.5 mm diameter. A sludge
sample
(50 mL) was sieved sequentially using first the mesh sieve with the
larger pore size (2.5 mm), followed by 2.0, 1.4, 0.9, and finally
0.4 mm pore size. Then, each size fraction was used for elemental
and XRD analysis and total and volatile suspended solids (TSS and
VSS, respectively) quantification. Elemental composition (P, Ca and
Mg) was determined by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission
spectroscopy (PerkinElmer Optima 5300 DV ICP-OES) after an HNO3 digestion at 148 °C for 45 min, using a microwave (MWD
Milestone). TSS and VSS were determined by gravimetric standard method.[19]XRD analyses were performed with a Bruker
D8 Advance diffractometer
280 mm measurement radius using Cu radiation with Linear PSD 3°
detector opening, divergence slit at 0.58° and a soller slit
at 2.5°. The samples were dried at 105 °C for 12h and ground
before the measurements. The software TOPAS (Bruker) based on Rietveld
method was used for pattern fitting. Amorphous content was deduced
by the degree of crystallinity obtained in the model. The R-weighted
pattern was kept below 7 for all spectra model, fitting only the Lorentzian
and Gaussian component convolutions of the identified phase structures
of hydroxyapatite (COD 9002216 P_63/m) and calcite (COD 9016706 R_-3_c).
The morphology and the elemental distribution of CaP granules were
assessed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-6480LV
in backscattered detection at 15 kV coupled with NORAN Systems SIX
EDX (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The EDX system is factory calibrated
using pure minerals. Then the compositional quantification is done
via peak integration considering the known spectrum of each element
and the peaks intensity. After sieve separation, a set of 10 CaP granules
from the reactor without Ca2+ addition were dried at room
temperature and sectioned with a scalp for cross-sectional line scan
analysis and only dried for visualization of the outer biofilm and
elemental mapping.
Calculation of Mass Flows of HCO3–, H+ and H2 during Anaerobic
Digestion of BW
and HAP Crystallization from Less Stable Ca(PO4) Phases
Anaerobic digestion of BW was previously modeled by Feng et al. (2006).[20] The model and adopted parameters were then used
in this study to calculate the mass flow of HCO3–, H+, and H2 between the bulk and granule.
In the model, acidification of products from hydrolysis (monosaccharides
(MS), amino acids (AA), and long-chain fatty acids (LCFA)) are assumed
to occur near the granule edge. Though acetogenic activity was not
determined, acetogens were assumed in the granule biofilm as syntrophy
between acetogens and hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens
prevails.[15] Acetate in BW (influent) is
converted into CH4 and HCO3– in the bulk of the reactor and propionate and butyrate are only
consumed in the outer biofilm, along with consumption of produced
H2 by hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Equations and parameters
used are extensively described in the Supporting Information (S3). The calculation was based on a volumetric
unit (L) of BW. COD input parameters were taken from previous experiments.[7] These values were 6.9 g L–1 of particulate and colloidal COD and 1.6 g L–1 of soluble COD. Soluble COD was assumed to be a mixture of acetate,
propionate, and butyrate (66%, 32%, and 2%, respectively), which corresponded
with the measured VFA concentration in BW.[7]Crystallization of HAP at pH between 7 and 7.5 and room temperature
is occurring via Ca deficient ACP precursors.[12] OCP is the intermediate phase, which consists of an agglomeration
of ACP complexes mediated by Ca2+ assimilation.[12] A complete conversion of ACP into HAP was assumed
to estimate the complete release of H+. The fact that HAP
is the thermodynamically most stable Ca(PO4) phase, and therefore,
it is the prevailing crystal phase when the time is not limited is
the basis for this assumption. Moreover, only the accumulated Ca2+ and PO43–, which was further
divided into H2PO4– and HPO42– according to bulk pH (7.5), were considered
as input for the calculation. Solid Ca and P were not accounted.
Results and Discussion
Internal pH Profile and Saturation State
of Ca(PO4) phases and calcite
The average internal pH peak of
the measured CaP granules (n =
11) was 7.93 ± 0.08 while the mobile phase was kept at 7.5 ±
0.03, which corresponded with the effluent pH (7.48 ±. 0.19)
in the 50 and 5 L UASB reactors used in this study.As a representative
example, the pH profile of a complete cross-section of a granule is
given in Figure .
Considering the soluble chemical composition of raw BW, both precursors
ACP and OCP are supersaturated at the higher pH inside the granule
as shown in Figure . Yet, in the granule core, the chemical speciation will differ as
the diffusion of substances will change with the physical structure
and thickness of the biofilm. Near the edge and outside of the granule
ACP and OCP are undersaturated, indicating that precipitation will
not occur. The pH of influent and effluent of the UASB reactors used
in this study was measured, but not bulk pH. The pH in the influent
BW was 7.9 ± 0.3, with a few peaks up to 8.7, which could induce
Ca and P precipitation as CaCO3, ACP, OCP, and struvite.
Effluent pH was always below 7.7. Bulk pH in the reactor is in between
influent and effluent pH, due to the plug-flow mode of the liquid
phase in the UASB reactor (low mixing). Considering the effluent pH,
CaCO3, ACP, and OCP are undersaturated. Thus, fine particles
observed in the bulk solution most likely were already formed prior
the entry in the UASB reactor. If bulk pH rose above 7.8, bulk precipitation
of ACP and OCP would be triggered, reducing the favored enrichment
of Ca(PO4) in granules over bulk precipitation.
Figure 1
Measured pH profile of
a representative CaP granule (∼3.0
mm diameter) and saturation state of amorphous calcium phosphate,
octacalcium phosphate and calcite in function of the pH measured.
For SI > 0 precipitation can occur (supersaturated), for SI <
0
precipitation hardly occurs (undersaturated) and for SI = 0 each specie
is in apparent equilibrium.
Measured pH profile of
a representative CaP granule (∼3.0
mm diameter) and saturation state of amorphous calcium phosphate,
octacalcium phosphate and calcite in function of the pH measured.
For SI > 0 precipitation can occur (supersaturated), for SI <
0
precipitation hardly occurs (undersaturated) and for SI = 0 each specie
is in apparent equilibrium.HAP is supersaturated for the entire pH range measured (SI
> 6),
and because of its low solubility (Ksp = 4.7 × 10–45), hydroxyapatite is thermodynamically
the dominant crystal phase for the BW chemical matrix. However, at
this phase no kinetic predictions about the formation time can be
made. This is because HAP nucleation and mineralization time can be
influenced by several uncontrolled factors, such as presence organic
compounds (proteins and collagen fibers), existing surface and ionic
activity of inhibitors, such as Mg and carbonate (CO32–).[10,21−23] CaCO3 (calcite) was supersaturated only within the boundaries of the granule,
suggesting that coprecipitation of CaCO3 within the granule
is possible. Yet, over time Ca(PO4) phases prevail due to the thermodynamic
equilibrium (lower Ksp), leading to recrystallization
of CaCO3 into Ca(PO4).[24,25] Note that
the retention time for solids in the UASB reactor treating BW varied
from 163 to >365 days as previously demonstrated.[7,26]The supersaturation in the granule core, which is induced
by the
internal higher pH, is crucial for formation of Ca(PO4) within CaP granules.
Consequently, the formation of Ca(PO4) fines, which are difficult
to separate from the dispersed sludge, is reduced. Model results in Figure are validated by
measuring the Ca and P concentrations in a granule cross-section as
shown further in Figure a, using SEM-EDX line scan.
Figure 2
Elemental (P and Ca) line scan (a) of a granule
cross section from
the 5 L reactor without Ca2+ addition (b) measured with
energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) coupled with scanning electron microscope
(SEM). SEM representation of a CaP granule partially detached from
the outer biofilm (c) taken from the 5 L reactor with Ca2+ addition, and its respective elemental distribution measured with
EDX (d).
Elemental (P and Ca) line scan (a) of a granule
cross section from
the 5 L reactor without Ca2+ addition (b) measured with
energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) coupled with scanning electron microscope
(SEM). SEM representation of a CaP granule partially detached from
the outer biofilm (c) taken from the 5 L reactor with Ca2+ addition, and its respective elemental distribution measured with
EDX (d).
Methanogenic Activity and
Outer Biofilm of CaP Granules
Methanogenic activity tests
on CaP granules showed that acetate and
H2/CO2 were metabolized into CH4 at
0.245 ± 0.042 and 0.088 ± 0.026 gCOD-CH4 g–1VSS d–1, respectively. The obtained
activity rates are within the range found in existing literature,
but lower than the average.[27] The lower
methanogenic activity for H2 compared to acetate might
be partly due to the low temperature (25 °C) applied in the activity
tests and in the UASB reactor or the spatial distribution of microorganisms
in the biofilm of CaP granules. For instance, acetoclastic methanogens
might be located on the outer part of the biofilm, due to the relatively
high concentration of acetate in the influent black water (1.1 ±
0.5 g L–1), whereas hydrogenotrophic methanogens
might be located deeper in the biofilm with lower access to substrate
from the bulk solution.The characteristic outer biofilm of
CaP granules is determined with SEM in backscattering mode in Figure b and c. This allows
distinguishing an outer biofilm (darkened) from an inorganic core
(lightened). SEM images of other granule samples are shown in Supporting Information (S4) and show a similar
observation. The SEM-EDX line scan (white line in Figure b) shows that the P and Ca
contents (wt %) are higher in the core than in the outer biofilm of
the granule (Figure a). Data points are recorded each μm during the line scan (812
measurements in total) to measure the elemental composition in the
background, outer biofilm, and granule core. The average P content
for the background (from 0 to 150 μm) was 0.3 wt %, which is
below the detection limit of 1 wt %. The average P content for the
organic outer layer (from 150 to 260 μm and from 360 to 420
μm) was 2.1 wt % and for the core (from 420 to 800 μm)
increased to 10.9 wt %. The P and Ca peak between 260 and 360 μm
in the line scan corresponds to an isolated Ca(PO4) particle within
the outer biofilm. The P content of the outer biofilm is higher than
the P content commonly observed for nonlimiting P anaerobic biomass
(1.2 wt %), due to the presence of fine Ca(PO4) particles.[28,29] In the core, the Ca/P molar ratio is 1.74 ± 0.63, which is
higher than the theoretical Ca/P molar ratio in HAP of 1.67,[12] caused by the presence of CaCO3 as
it will be explained later on Figure . Both microbial groups were found in cross-sectioned
CaP granules using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but
issues with background autofluorescence limited the microbial mapping
in the granule cross section (results not shown). These observations
support the hypothesis of local metabolic conversion of acetate and
H2, HCO3– and H+ into CH4, which most probably cause the local higher
pH and formation of Ca(PO4).
Figure 5
XRD scans of particles <0.4 mm diameter and
CaP granules with
diameter between 2 and 2.5 mm from sludge samples taken from the reactor
without Ca2+ addition (1 and 2) and reactor with Ca2+ addition (3 and 4), and XRD scans of Hydroxyapatite (HAP)
and Calcite (5 and 6). The weight percentage of amorphous (a), crystal
HAP (b), and crystal calcite (c) contents, according to Rietveld pattern
fitting.
Favorable Ca(PO4) Enrichment
of Granules over Bulk Precipitation
By supplying 250 to 500
mgCa2+ L–1BW, the P content
of particles >0.4 mm diameter increased
from 3.9 ± 0.5 to 6.2 ± 0.9 wt %, whereas for particles
<0.4 mm diameter the P content decreased from 2.9 ± 0.1 to
2.4 ± 0.3 wt % (Figure a and b). In both situations, with and without Ca2+ addition, the P content in particles >0.4 mm diameter is higher
than in fine particles (<0.4 mm diameter). Moreover, the concentration
of fine particles did not increase by adding Ca2+, but
the granule formation rate and granule size as demonstrated in Cunha
et al. (2018).[7] This confirms that Ca(PO4) enrichment of granules is favored over bulk precipitation, which
is in line with the calculated supersaturation for Ca(PO4) phases
in the center of the granule (Figure ).
Figure 3
Correlation between size (diameter) and P, Ca, Mg, and
VSS (as
the ratio VSS/TSS) contents and the Ca/P molar ratio for each size
fraction of sludge taken from the 5 L reactors, without Ca2+ addition (a) and with Ca2+ addition (b). Values are averages
of four samples taken on operation days 350, 415, 436, and 460.
Correlation between size (diameter) and P, Ca, Mg, and
VSS (as
the ratio VSS/TSS) contents and the Ca/P molar ratio for each size
fraction of sludge taken from the 5 L reactors, without Ca2+ addition (a) and with Ca2+ addition (b). Values are averages
of four samples taken on operation days 350, 415, 436, and 460.By adding extra Ca2+, supersaturation for Ca(PO4) phases
in the bulk of the reactor is created. However, results in Figure show that Ca(PO4) bulk precipitation did not occur, because the P content in fine
particles (<0.4 mm diameter) with Ca2+ addition was
lower than without Ca2+ addition (Figure ). Moreover, the degree of crystallinity
in particles <0.4 mm diameter did not increase by adding Ca2+ (Figure ). The absence of bulk precipitation can be explained by complexation
of added Ca2+ with negatively charged extracellular polymeric
substances (EPS) and microbial cell surfaces in the outer biofilm,
stimulating Ca(PO4) precipitation in the granule over bulk precipitation.
Without the complexation of Ca2+ with existing EPS and
microorganisms and the consequent local increase of Ca2+ and pH, the P content in fine particles would have increased due
to Ca(PO4) bulk precipitation.There are two possible mechanisms
for formation of CaP granules
(Figure ): (1) attachment
of biomass (EPS and microorganisms) to an existing inorganic seed
particle, which further grows developing a CaP granule, consisting
of an outer biofilm and an inorganic core containing mainly Ca(PO4), and (2) complexation of Ca2+ with biomass (EPS and microorganisms)
creating local conditions for Ca(PO4) precipitation and subsequent
formation of a CaP granule by agglomeration of biomass and formed
Ca(PO4); the formed Ca(PO4) remains in the core along with the
internal decay of biomass. The growth of CaP granules can occur via
two pathways (Figure ): (1) diffusion of Ca2+ and PO43– through the biofilm and precipitation of Ca(PO4) directly in the
granule core, and (2) precipitation of Ca(PO4) in the outer biofilm
and eventual transport of Ca(PO4) precipitates to the core along with
the internal decay of the outer biofilm. The latter is supported by
isolated inorganic particles (white particles) within the outer biofilm
as shown in Figures b and 4. The agglomeration of Ca(PO4) assemblies
was previously observed, and it occurs via an amorphous interface.[8,30] Over time, precursor phases (Ca(PO4)) formed in the outer biofilm
or core edge recrystallize to HAP as the core grows. The decrease
in VSS content along the granule growth (Figure a and b) supports the previous mechanisms
for Ca(PO4) enrichment and maturation in CaP granules. Although individual
granule development could not be followed in time, the results of
the elemental composition and crystallinity of different particle
sizes from 16 representative sludge samples taken at different operation
times and reactor heights (Figures and 5, respectively) strongly indicate that CaP granules do mature in
time.
Figure 4
Proposed mechanism for CaP granulation supported by SEM and SEM-EDX
images of CaP granules. The numbers (1) and (2) refer to the possible
mechanisms for formation (initiation) and growth of CaP granules.
Proposed mechanism for CaP granulation supported by SEM and SEM-EDX
images of CaP granules. The numbers (1) and (2) refer to the possible
mechanisms for formation (initiation) and growth of CaP granules.XRD scans of particles <0.4 mm diameter and
CaP granules with
diameter between 2 and 2.5 mm from sludge samples taken from the reactor
without Ca2+ addition (1 and 2) and reactor with Ca2+ addition (3 and 4), and XRD scans of Hydroxyapatite (HAP)
and Calcite (5 and 6). The weight percentage of amorphous (a), crystal
HAP (b), and crystal calcite (c) contents, according to Rietveld pattern
fitting.With Ca2+ addition,
a maximum P content was observed
for CaP granules with a size between 1.4 and 2.5 mm diameter (Figure b). Moreover, the
VSS content was higher for granules >2.5 mm diameter than the latter
size range, suggesting that granule maturation was not completely
in line with the CaP granule growth (size) when Ca2+ was
added. This indicates the existence of two populations of CaP granules
with similar size, but different Ca(PO4) content or maturation stages.
The reduction in granule size during maturation is most probably related
to a decrease in the surface available for attachment of organic material
along with the growth of the inorganic core or increase in core density.
The formation, growth, and maturation of CaP granules are stimulated
by adding Ca2+. When Ca2+ is added, the Ca(PO4) content in mature CaP granules (with a diameter between 0.9 and
2.5 mm) increases, while the VSS content decreases (Figure b). This was not observed for
CaP granules formed without Ca2+ addition, where a linear
relationship between VSS and P contents and size was obtained (Figure a).
Crystal Properties
of CaP Granules
Crystal phase identification
showed that HAP and calcite were the most prominent phases in all
particle sizes for both conditions, with and without Ca2+ addition (Figure ). Additional XRD spectra are in Supporting Information (S5) and show the same observation. The broadening and overlap
of the HAP peaks between positions (2°Theta) 30 and 35 are most
likely due to the presence of HAP nanocrystals.[31,32] The percentage of HAP was always higher than calcite, and a positive
correlation between the particle size and HAP content was observed
(Figure ). By adding
Ca2+ the crystal percentage of HAP in CaP granules (>0.4
mm diameter) increased from 8.4 ± 2.0 to 21.5 ± 5.4%, while
the crystal percentage of calcite remained relatively constant (2.0
± 0.3% without Ca2+ addition and 2.3 ± 0.6% with
Ca2+ addition). Moreover, the amorphous content of CaP
granules decreased with the Ca2+ addition from 89.6 ±
2.1 to 76.2 ± 5.9%. Additionally, pattern fitting results showed
that crystallite size for HAP and calcite were on average 5.5 ±
0.5 and 31.4 ± 11.3 nm for all granule size fractions and those
are similar to the crystallite sizes reported in previous studies.[12,33−35] The increase in crystallite size of HAP in CaP granules
was minor by adding Ca2+ (from 5.1 ± 0.4 to 5.8 ±
0.2 nm). Thus, Ca2+ addition increased the Ca(PO4) content
in CaP granules by enhancing the formation and agglomeration of nanocrystals.
According to existing literature, the crystallization of HAP nanocrystals
is mediated by ACP complexes, which facilitate the H+ release
from H2PO4– and HPO42– by binding Ca2+ (Ca2+-HPO42–), evolving to the intermediate phase
OCP.[8,10] Then, the growth of the HAP nanocrystal
is occurring via OCP dissolution and recrystallization of OCP lattice
ions into the prenanocrystal until the maximum size, which is based
on the ordered structure of the surface (P_63/m) for the solution
conditions, being reached.[9,10,32] Then, the HAP nanocrystals (∼5 nm) agglomerate through the
formation of a hydration layer.[8,32] The hydration layer
dictates the overall particle size of the HAP conglomerate and the
reactivity with cationic (e.g., Ca2+ and Mg2+), inorganic (e.g., CaCO3) and organic compounds (e.g.,
collagen fibers).[12,22,36,37] Moreover, the exact composition and structural
properties of the hydration layer are dependent on the water-pore
composition of the granules.[32,37] Therefore, the internal
conditions in CaP granules play a crucial role not only in the Ca(PO4) formation but also on the agglomeration mechanism.
Effect of HCO3–, H+ and
H2 Flows on CaP Granulation
Conversion of H+, HCO3– and H2 into
CH4 in the outer biofilm, mass transfer limitations created
by the outer biofilm and eventual stripping of CO2 (H2CO3) and CH4 gases from the granule
induce an internal environment in CaP granules with reduced H+ ionic activity (higher pH) and lower CO32– concentration. This is crucial for Ca(PO4) enrichment of the granules,
because H+ released from the deprotonation of H2PO4– and HPO42– and from the recrystallization of ACP and OCP into HAP need to be
locally buffered, in order to maintain the favorable conditions for
Ca(PO4) formation along with the granule maturation.[8,11,12]In Figure the estimated formation and consumption
of HCO3–, H+ and H2 throughout the anaerobic digestion of BW is shown. Acetate in BW
is readily converted into CH4 and HCO3– by disperse sludge in the bulk at the bottom of the reactor. The
calculated production of HCO3– from acetate
degradation in the bulk (16 mM) is similar to the experimentally measured
increase of HCO3– during the treatment
(13 ± 5 mM) in the reactor without Ca2+ addition.
In the reactor with Ca2+ addition, the measured increase
of HCO3– was only 6 ± 2 mM, most
likely because of higher CaCO3 formation in the bulk and
granules.
Figure 6
Mass balance between the biological degradation of solid and soluble
organic compounds in BW (above depth axis) and the formation of HAP
from less stable phases (ACP and OCP), considering the accumulated
Ortho-PO43– and Ca2+ in the
two situations, without and with Ca2+ addition (below depth
axis). The calculation was based on a volumetric unit (L) of BW. Operational
parameters were obtained from the treatment performance without and
with Ca2+ addition.[7] Degradation
and yield constants were adapted from Feng et al. (2006).
Mass balance between the biological degradation of solid and soluble
organic compounds in BW (above depth axis) and the formation of HAP
from less stable phases (ACP and OCP), considering the accumulated
Ortho-PO43– and Ca2+ in the
two situations, without and with Ca2+ addition (below depth
axis). The calculation was based on a volumetric unit (L) of BW. Operational
parameters were obtained from the treatment performance without and
with Ca2+ addition.[7] Degradation
and yield constants were adapted from Feng et al. (2006).Disintegration/hydrolysis of biodegradable organic
solids and colloids
yield MS, AA, and LCFA which are further acidified in the interface
between bulk and granule. This is because H2 produced during
acidogenesis is rapidly consumed by H2 consuming organisms
during hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in the outer edge of the granular
structure to enable further degradation of propionate and butyrate,
as previously proposed by Batstone et al. (2004) for anaerobic granules
treating brewery wastewater.[15] The anaerobic
degradation of propionate and butyrate is only exergonic when H2 partial pressure is lower than 10–4 atm,
and since H2 is a byproduct of propionate and butyrate
acetogenic reactions, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis must be locally
associated with acetogenesis.[14,38] Thus, degradation of
propionate and butyrate, which are products of acidogenesis, was assumed
to undergo within the outer biofilm of CaP granules. Yet, hydrogenotrophic
methanogenesis is also possible with disperse sludge due to the low
up-flow velocity applied (<1 cm h–1), enabling
conditions for exchange of substrates. H2 was never detected
in the biogas produced in the two 5 L reactors and the 50 L reactor
used in this study. Sludge bed analysis indicated that the percentage
of VSS (organic matter) in the granules (particles >0.4 mm diameter)
represented 72% and 81% of the total VSS in the sludge bed without
and with Ca2+ addition, respectively, after 460 days of
operation. Therefore, biological activity is expected to occur mainly
in the granules. In the model, products from acidogenesis were assumed
to be metabolized by acetogens and methanogens in the granule to estimate
the internal conversion of H2, H+, and HCO3– into CH4, explaining the internal
higher pH.The calculated concentration of H+ during
acidogenesis
of MS, AA and LCFA was 57.1 mM (Figure ). The consumption of H+ produced during
acidogenesis was assumed to take place within the outer biofilm of
the granule. Yet, part of the H+ may be responsible for
the decrease in bulk pH from 7.94 ± 0.33 (n =
58) in the influent BW to 7.44 ± 0.04 (n = 70).
Nevertheless, the uptake of H+ during hydrogenotrophic
methanogenesis and the buffering capacity by the HCO3– produced during internal acetoclastic methanogenesis
is sufficient to neutralize the total produced H+, including
the H+ released during the formation and recrystallization
of Ca(PO4) phases.Increased local pH in anaerobic granules measured
with micro pH
sensors was previously reported by Lens et al. (1993) and Yamaguchi
et al. (2001).[39,40] Lens et al. (1993) clearly demonstrated
that methanogenic activity was responsible for internal pH buffering
in anaerobic granules, and when methanogens are inhibited an internal
pH drop was observed instead of increase in aged anaerobic granules.[39] Yamaguchi et al. (2001) demonstrated that internal
methanogenic activity in anaerobic granules increases the internal
pH by acid (H+) consumption.[40] Moreover, Garcia-Robledo et al. (2016) by supplying H2 in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating sieved (2 mm) cattle
manure observed an increase in pH from 7 to 9.5 at 0.5 μm depth
in the biofilm.[41] This was due to a depletion
of CO2 (H+ and HCO3–) during hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Furthermore, Batstone et
al. (2004) modeled the degradation of MS, AA, LCFA, volatile fatty
acids (VFA), and H2 along the biofilm depth in an anaerobic
granule and also obtained an increasing pH gradient from the edge
toward the center. This is in line with the internal pH gradient measured
in CaP granules presented in this study (Figure ). Mañas et al. (2012) also observed
internal precipitation of calcium phosphate in anaerobic granules.[42] It was proposed that the increase in internal
pH is because of biological consumption of H+ during methanogenesis
in anaerobic granules and contributed to the internal precipitation.[42] Therefore, the favorable internal conditions
for Ca(PO4) formation are most likely biologically induced.For
the formation of HAP only the soluble P (Total Ortho-PO43–) retained in the reactors without (0.3
mM) and with (1.2 mM) Ca2+ addition was considered (Figure ). Solid P, which
represented 68% of the total P in BW, was mostly accumulated in the
reactor in both situations, with and without Ca2+ addition.
Solid P was in the form of organically bound P, struvite, and Ca(PO4).[43] Organically bound P is hydrolyzed
and solubilized as PO43–, which leaves
the reactor in the effluent or is used for Ca(PO4) formation within
the granules, depending on the Ca2+ concentration.[6] Because of the HCO3– surplus, CaCO3 is likely formed in the outer biofilm
(up to 11 wt %, derived from the Ca/P molar ratio presented in Figure ). However, CaCO3 dissolves over time due to the thermodynamic advantage of
HAP formation.[24] Traces of struvite were
also observed in the outer biofilm, representing up to 12 wt % of
the granules without Ca2+ addition, but they dissolve when
Ca2+ is added, representing less than 2.5 wt % (Figure ). Struvite was detected
in the XRD spectrum of solids from the influent black water, but not
in flocculent sludge nor CaP granules.The time evolution of
a CaP granule is a complex process involving
three main aspects: (1) recrystallization and maturation of crystals
and amorphous complexes from different species (Ca(PO4), CaCO3 and struvite); (2) microbial growth and decay in the outer biofilm
and (3) anaerobic degradation of organics in BW. In this study, these
three aspects were correlated based on the anaerobic treatment of
a volumetric unit (L) of BW, without a kinetic reference (Figure ). For a kinetic
correlation, a single granule imbedded in BW could be individually
monitored in a batch system over a defined period. Then, biological
and crystallographic parameters could be correlated with time, providing
more insights into the organic and inorganic growth rates in CaP granules.
Harvesting Strategy Based on Growth Mechanism
Supplementation
of Ca2+ (250 mg L–1BW) during
BW treatment increased the retention the total incoming P in the UASB
reactor (89%), but only 31% was harvested as CaP granules.[7] This is because CaP granules were harvested at
different heights without any selection factor for mature CaP granules.
The harvested CaP granules (>0.4 mm diameter) contained on average
6.2 wt % P (Figure ), but the granule core showed a P content of 10.9 wt % (Figure ). This is because
the harvesting of nonmature granules (>0.4 mm diameter) implies
the
removal of a higher amount of organic matter. Thus, the harvesting
strategy is crucial for the recovery efficiency and overall process
feasibility. Based on the growth mechanism (Figures and 4), larger granules
are not necessarily fully mature. Therefore, size separation in the
reactor is not ideal. The density of HAP varies from 2 to 6 g/cm3, depending on the formation conditions. Because a much lower
density was observed for dispersed sludge (1.4 g/cm3),
internal liquid or gas upflow mixing could be used to enhance the
concentration of denser granules at the bottom part. Simultaneously,
lifted granules and fine inorganic particles would have higher contact
with biomass, PO43– and Ca2+, stimulating the further growth of younger granules and the formation
of the initial nuclei; note that with the UASB configuration used
in this study the liquid flows in a vertical plug-flow mode. Additionally,
attention should be given to the bulk pH, which should be kept below
7.8 to avoid unwanted Ca(PO4) precipitation in the bulk of the reactor.
Authors: J R Cunha; T Tervahauta; R D van der Weijden; L Hernández Leal; G Zeeman; C J N Buisman Journal: J Environ Manage Date: 2017-09-09 Impact factor: 6.789
Authors: Taina Tervahauta; Renata D van der Weijden; Roberta L Flemming; Lucía Hernández Leal; Grietje Zeeman; Cees J N Buisman Journal: Water Res Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: Jorge Ricardo Cunha; Sara Morais; Joana C Silva; Renata D van der Weijden; Lucía Hernández Leal; Grietje Zeeman; Cees J N Buisman Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 9.028