Saida R Sharapova1, Elyse Phillips1, Karen Sirocco2, Jennifer W Kaminski3, Rebecca T Leeb3, Italia Rolle1. 1. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention, Prevention Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Division of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Normalisation of medicinal and recreational marijuana use has increased the importance of fully understanding effects of marijuana use on individual-and population-level health, including prenatal exposure effects on child development. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to examine the long-term effects of prenatal marijuana exposure on neuropsychological function in children aged 1-11 years. METHODS: Primary research publications were searched from Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL EbscoHost, Cochrane Library, Global Health and ERIC (1980-2018). Eligible articles documented neuropsychological outcomes in children 1-11 years who had been prenatally exposed to marijuana. Studies of exposure to multiple prenatal drugs were included if results for marijuana exposure were reported separately from other substances. Data abstraction was independently performed by two reviewers using a standardised protocol. RESULTS: The eligible articles (n = 21) on data from seven independent longitudinal studies had high quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Some analyses found associations (P < 0.05) between prenatal marijuana exposure and decreased performance on memory, impulse control, problem-solving, quantitative reasoning, verbal development and visual analysis tests; as well as increased performance on attention and global motion perception tests. Limitations included concurrent use of other substances among study participants, potential under-reporting and publication biases, non-generalisable samples and limited published results preventing direct comparison of analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The specific effects of prenatal marijuana exposure remain unclear and warrant further research. The larger number of neuropsychological domains that exhibit decreased versus increased psychological and behavioural functions suggests that exposure to marijuana may be harmful for brain development and function. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Normalisation of medicinal and recreational marijuana use has increased the importance of fully understanding effects of marijuana use on individual-and population-level health, including prenatal exposure effects on child development. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to examine the long-term effects of prenatal marijuana exposure on neuropsychological function in children aged 1-11 years. METHODS: Primary research publications were searched from Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL EbscoHost, Cochrane Library, Global Health and ERIC (1980-2018). Eligible articles documented neuropsychological outcomes in children 1-11 years who had been prenatally exposed to marijuana. Studies of exposure to multiple prenatal drugs were included if results for marijuana exposure were reported separately from other substances. Data abstraction was independently performed by two reviewers using a standardised protocol. RESULTS: The eligible articles (n = 21) on data from seven independent longitudinal studies had high quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Some analyses found associations (P < 0.05) between prenatal marijuana exposure and decreased performance on memory, impulse control, problem-solving, quantitative reasoning, verbal development and visual analysis tests; as well as increased performance on attention and global motion perception tests. Limitations included concurrent use of other substances among study participants, potential under-reporting and publication biases, non-generalisable samples and limited published results preventing direct comparison of analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The specific effects of prenatal marijuana exposure remain unclear and warrant further research. The larger number of neuropsychological domains that exhibit decreased versus increased psychological and behavioural functions suggests that exposure to marijuana may be harmful for brain development and function. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Gale A Richardson; Christopher Ryan; Jennifer Willford; Nancy L Day; Lidush Goldschmidt Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Sarah G Benevenuto; Marlise D Domenico; Marco Antônio G Martins; Natália S Costa; Ana Rosa L de Souza; Jose L Costa; Marina F M Tavares; Marisa Dolhnikoff; Mariana Matera Veras Journal: Toxicology Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Qiana L Brown; Aaron L Sarvet; Dvora Shmulewitz; Silvia S Martins; Melanie M Wall; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ruth Rose-Jacobs; Mark A Richardson; Kathryn Buchanan-Howland; Clara A Chen; Howard Cabral; Timothy C Heeren; Jane Liebschutz; Leah Forman; Deborah A Frank Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Benjamin Thompson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Natalia Karpova; Dake Zhang; Anna Malia Beckwith; David S Bennett; Michael Lewis Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Kelly C Young-Wolff; Varada Sarovar; Lue-Yen Tucker; Deborah Ansley; Nancy Goler; Amy Conway; Allison Ettenger; Tara R Foti; Qiana L Brown; Ellen T Kurtzman; Sara R Adams; Stacey E Alexeeff Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: S L Mumford; K S Flannagan; J G Radoc; L A Sjaarda; J R Zolton; T D Metz; T C Plowden; N J Perkins; E A DeVilbiss; V C Andriessen; Purdue-Smithe A C; K Kim; S F Yisahak; J R Freeman; Z Alkhalaf; R M Silver; E F Schisterman Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.918