Literature DB >> 30334791

Improving Spatial Resolution Using Incoherent Subtraction of Receive Beams Having Different Apodizations.

Anil Agarwal, Jonathan Reeg, Anthony S Podkowa, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

In ultrasonic imaging, reduction of lateral sidelobes can result in an improved image with less distortion and fewer artifacts. In general, apodization is used to lower sidelobes in exchange for increasing the width of the main lobe, and thus decreasing lateral resolution. Null subtraction imaging (NSI) is a nonlinear image processing technique that uses different receive apodizations on copies of the same RF data to maintain low sidelobe levels while simultaneously improving lateral resolution. The images created with three different apodization functions are combined to form an image with low sidelobe levels and apparent improvements in lateral resolution compared to conventional rectangular apodization. To evaluate the performance of this technique for different imaging tasks, experiments were performed on an ATS539 phantom containing wire targets to assess lateral resolution and cylindrical anechoic and hyperechoic targets to assess contrast. NSI images were compared against rectangular apodized images and minimum variance beamformed images. In experiments, the apparent lateral resolution was observed to improve by a factor of more than 35× when compared to rectangular apodization. Image quality was assessed by the estimation of lateral resolution (-6-dB receive beamwidth), main-lobe-to-sidelobe ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Imaging with NSI using a focal number of 2 (f/2), the -6-dB beamwidth on receive as measured from a small wire target in the ATS phantom was 0.03λ compared to 2.79λ for rectangular apodization. Sidelobes were observed to decrease by 32.9 dB with NSI compared to rectangular apodization. However, the ability to observe the contrast of anechoic and hyperechoic targets reduced when utilizing the NSI scheme, i.e., the CNR decreased from -3.05 to -1.01 for anechoic targets and 1.65 to 0.45 for the hyperechoic targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30334791      PMCID: PMC6350248          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2876285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  15 in total

1.  New image processing technique for evaluating breast microcalcifications: a comparative study.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; John R Eisenbrey; Barbara Cavanaugh; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part II: simulation results.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part I: theory.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Johan-Fredrik Synnevag; Andreas Austeng; Sverre Holm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  A low-complexity data-dependent beamformer.

Authors:  Johan-Fredrik Synnevag; Andreas Austeng; Sverre Holm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  A sidelobe suppressing near-field beamforming approach for ultrasound array imaging.

Authors:  Zhengyao He; Fan Zheng; Yuanliang Ma; Hyung Ham Kim; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency independent ultrasound contrast-detail analysis.

Authors:  S W Smith; H Lopez; W J Bodine
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustic backscattering from ultrasonically tissuelike media.

Authors:  M F Insana; J A Zagzebski; E L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dual-/tri-apodization techniques for high frequency ultrasound imaging: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jin Ho Sung; Jong Seob Jeong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  4 in total

1.  Phase Modulation Beamforming for Ultrafast Plane-Wave Imaging.

Authors:  Bowen Jing; Brooks D Lindsey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Deep Learning-Based Microbubble Localization for Ultrasound Localization Microscopy.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Matthew R Lowerison; Zhijie Dong; Aiguo Han; Pengfei Song
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Improved Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Based on Microbubble Uncoupling via Transmit Excitation.

Authors:  Jihun Kim; Mathew R Lowerison; Nathiya V Chandra Sekaran; Zhengchang Kou; Zhijie Dong; Michael L Oelze; Daniel A Llano; Pengfei Song
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Challenges of conducting quantitative ultrasound with a multimodal optical imaging system.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Timothy J Hall; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.609

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.