Literature DB >> 30334245

Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Multiple Renal Calculi in 10-30 mm Size.

Fatih Yanaral1, Faruk Ozgor2, Onur Kucuktopcu2, Omer Sarilar2, Ali Ayranci2, Metin Savun2, Bahar Yuksel3, Murat Binbay2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) in the management of 10-30 millimeter multiple renal stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of patients who underwent f-URS or mini-perc for multiple kidney stones between January 2011 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with multiple 10-30-mm-sized renal stones were enrolled in the study. A total of 374 patients underwent mini-perc and 85 patients met the study inclusion criteria. In the same period, f-URS was performed in 562 patients, and 163 had 10-30-mm multiple renal stones. We selected 85 patients to serve as the control group from this cohort using propensity score matching with respect to the patient's age, ASA score, number, size, and location of stones to avoid potential bias between groups.
RESULTS: The mean operation time and fluoroscopy screening time (FST) was significantly longer in the mini-perc group (P = .001 and P = .001, respectively). The mean hospitalization time was 76.9±38.7 hours in the mini-perc group and 25.0±27.7 hours in the f-URS group (P = .001). Post-operative complications, according to the Clavien classification system, were significantly more frequent in the mini-perc group (P = .003). The stone-free rate was 87% in the f-URS group and 83.5% in the mini-perc group (P = .66).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that f-URS and mini-perc were effective treatment options for multiple renal stones 10-30 mm in size. However, f-URS was associated with a significantly lower complication rate, shorter operation time, shorter FST, and shorter hospitalization time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30334245     DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.3310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Guangda Lv; Zhiwei Zhang; Fei Du; Wenqiang Qi; Minglei Zhong; Yongheng Zhou; Changkuo Zhou; Yan Li; Dongqing Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-09

2.  Clinical comparative study of standard channel percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscope and traditional standard channel combined with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of multiple renal calculi without hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Yuanshan Guo; Lijun Yang; Xin Xu; Chao Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.340

3.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of stones at ureteropelvic junction with high-grade hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Yun Hong; Zesong Yang; Liefu Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Is fluoroscopy necessary during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones?

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Burak Kopru; Giray Ergin; Yusuf Kibar; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.