Literature DB >> 30334072

On the steady state optimization of the biogas production in a two-stage anaerobic digestion model.

Térence Bayen1,2, Pedro Gajardo3.   

Abstract

In this paper, we study the optimization problem of maximizing biogas production at steady state in a two-stage anaerobic digestion model, which was initially proposed in Bernard et al. (Biotechnol Bioeng 75(4):424-438, 2001). Nominal operating points, consisting of steady states where the involved microorganisms coexist, are usually referred to as desired operational conditions, in particular for maximizing biogas production. Nevertheless, we prove that under some conditions related to input substrate concentrations and microorganism biology, characterized by their growth functions, the optimal steady state can be the extinction of one of the two species. We provide some numerical examples of this situation.

Keywords:  Anaerobic digestion; Biotechnology; Equilibrium; Optimization; Steady state analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30334072     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-018-1301-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  9 in total

1.  Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process.

Authors:  O Bernard; Z Hadj-Sadok; D Dochain; A Genovesi; J P Steyer
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  An optimizing start-up strategy for a bio-methanator.

Authors:  Mihaela Sbarciog; Mia Loccufier; Alain Vande Wouwer
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in European countries.

Authors:  Alexandros Kelessidis; Athanasios S Stasinakis
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 7.145

4.  Coexistence in the chemostat as a result of metabolic by-products.

Authors:  Julia Hesseler; Julia K Schmidt; Udo Reichl; Dietrich Flockerzi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria.

Authors:  A NOVICK; L SZILARD
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: a review.

Authors:  Andres Donoso-Bravo; Johan Mailier; Cristina Martin; Jorge Rodríguez; César Arturo Aceves-Lara; Alain Vande Wouwer
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Characterisation of winery wastewater from continuous flow settling basins and waste stabilisation ponds over the course of 1 year: implications for biological wastewater treatment and land application.

Authors:  P J Welz; G Holtman; R Haldenwang; M le Roes-Hill
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.915

8.  Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic.

Authors:  Moonil Kim; Young-Ho Ahn; R E Speece
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1).

Authors:  D J Batstone; J Keller; I Angelidaki; S V Kalyuzhnyi; S G Pavlostathis; A Rozzi; W T M Sanders; H Siegrist; V A Vavilin
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.