| Literature DB >> 30333795 |
John R Lawrence1, Marcus Winkler2, Thomas R Neu3.
Abstract
AlthoughEntities:
Keywords: CLSM; EPS; FISH; biofilms; methanol; microenvironment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30333795 PMCID: PMC6176653 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Binding of selected fluor conjugated lectins and other probes to the biofilm.
| – | – | |
| + | + | |
| – | – | |
| + | + | |
| – | – | |
| – | – | |
| + | +/– | |
| – | – | |
| – | – | |
| – | + | |
| – | – | |
| – | – | |
| + | + | |
| + | – | |
| + | – | |
| + | – | |
| – | – | |
| – | + | |
| – | – | |
| + | + | |
| + | + | |
| + | – | |
| – | +/– | |
| – | – | |
| – | +/– | |
| SyproOrange | – | – |
| SyproRed | – | – |
| Dextran 10k m.w. anionic FITC | – | + |
| Dextran 10k m.w. polyanionic Rh B | – | + |
| Dextran 10k m.w. neutral Rh B | – | – |
| Nile Red | – | – |
Figure 1(A–F) Confocal laser micrographs showing the development of reference river biofilm (A,C,E) and river biofilm amended with methanol (B,D,F), bacteria appear green, photosynthetic algae red and exopolymer blue. (A–D) shows the biofilm 4 days after initiation of methanol supplementation, (B–E) after 56 days and (C–D), 87 days. The biofilm thickness at each time period was A = 60 μm, B = 80 μm, C = 170 μm, D = 100 μm, E = 170 μm, E = 430 μm respectively. Scale bar of 25 μm applies to all images.
Figure 2Photograph of the macroscopic appearance of the biofilm when grown on polycarbonate coupons (A) with and (B) without 200 mg l−1 methanol addition.
Figure 3Graphs showing the results of digital image analyses of confocal images indicating the changes in bacteria, total photosynthetic biomass (algae and cyanobacteria), exopolymeric substances and biofilm thickness in river biofilms without (top) and with (bottom) methanol additions.
Results of statistical comparison of reference and methanol fed biofilm parameters during the developmental period (160 days).
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||
| 7 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 5 | ||||
| 14 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 17 | ||||
| 21 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 18 | ||||
| 28 | 0.09 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 39 | ||||
| 30 | 200 mg l−1 methanol treatment starts | |||||||
| 35 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 52 | 110 |
| 42 | 0.10 | 0.60 | 1.4 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.66 | 75 | 100 |
| 49 | 0.22 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 78 | 170 |
| 56 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 1.0 | 0.59 | 75 | 180 |
| 62 | 0.64 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 78 | 380 |
| 82 | 0.96 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.83 | 2.8 | 0.37 | 140 | 450 |
| 160 | 2.4 | 0.00 nd | 5.5 | 2.0 nd | 1.3 | 0.05 nd | 110 | 460 nd |
Significantly different from corresponding reference value @p ≤ 0.05.
Total photosynthetic biomass includes algae and cyanobacteria.
nd, not determined.
Determination of the relative abundance of selected microbial populations in reference and methanol fed biofilms, as detected by plate count and MPN methods.
| Total heterotrophs (10% TSA) | 3.0 × 106 | 1.7 × 105 |
| Actinomycetes (Actinomycete Isolation Agar) | 3.9 × 105 | 1.5 × 104 |
| Pseudomonads (Pseudomonas Isolation Agar) | 9.6 × 101 | 5.2 × 101 |
| Fungi (Rose Bengal Agar) | 2.7 × 102 | 7.8 × 102 |
| Methylotrophs (Methylotroph Methanol medium) | 1.9 × 103 | 1.7 × 102 |
| NH4 Oxidizers | ND | 1.4 × 102 |
| NO2 Oxidizers | 1.4 × 102 | 9.7 × 101 |
| Denitrifiers | 4.0 × 104 | 3.1 × 103 |
| Sulfur Oxidizers (ATCC 125 Medium) | 2.1 × 102 | 6.3 × 101 |
| Iron Oxidizers (K9 Mineral Salts Medium) | 1.1 × 101 | ND |
| Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (Peptone Iron Agar) | 3.9 × 103 | 3.5 × 103 |
Colony forming units or MPN cm.
Results of 16S r-RNA probe analysis of the methanol biofilm.
| Total (Sytox) | 1.08 ± 0.58 | |
| Eubacteria (EUB 338) | 0.76 ± 0.46 | 70 ± 43 |
| Alpha 1b | 0.34 ± 0.15 | 32 ± 14 |
| Beta 42a | 0.18 ± 0.14 | 16 ± 13 |
| Gamma 42a | 0.15 ± 0.10 | 14 ± 9 |
| CF 319a | 0.36 ± 0.33 | 34 ± 31 |
| SRB 385Db | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 14 ± 10 |
Figure 4(A–H) CLSM micrographs showing the binding of a panel of fluor conjugated lectins within methanol biofilms at 100 days. (A) Arachis hypogaea conjugated to CY5 binds to the cell surfaces of filamentous, rod and cocci shaped cells in the matrix, (B) Canavalia ensiformis (TRITC) binds to EPS surrounding a specific cell type in the biofilms, (C) Wisteria floribunda (FITC) binds to surfaces of large filaments and small colonies, (D) binding of Tetragonolobus purpureas (CY5) to polymer associated with the globular structures (at arrow) in the biofilm, (E) Ulex europeaus (FITC) binds to structural polymer similar to that seen in Figure 5C, (F) lectin from Caragana arborescens displayed binding to small masses of polymer. (G–H) CLSM micrographs of dual labeled (SyproOrange and Helix aspersa-FITC) methanol biofilm showing the diversity of bacterial morphologies found in interstitial regions of the matrix.
Figure 5(A–D) A series of CLSM micrographs showing the penetration of (A) 2,000K molecular weight (m.w.), (B) 400K m.w., (C) 40K m.w., and (D) 4K m.w. FITC conjugated dextrans into a methanol biofilm. Arrows indicate the location of the negatively stained globular structures (dark regions) surrounded by more permeable matrix polymer (see also Supplemental Movie 1).
Figure 6(A–F) A series of laser micrographs showing the penetration of 0.2 μm fluorescent latex beads into 400 μm of methanol biofilm material. Note that the beads, penetrate 400 μm of biofilm thickness, and that there are regions where the beads are excluded (B,C) which correspond the outline of the globular microcolonies.
Figure 7A series of 2-photon micrographs showing details of the nature of the boundaries of the globular structures in the methanol biofilm community. 160 day old specimen was labeled with Ulex europeaus-FITC. (A), xy image showing locations (crossed lines) of the two xz images shown in image (B) and (C) (see also Supplemental Movie 2).
Figure 8CLSM three channel image showing the staining of cells with the nucleic acid stain Syto 9, (green) the 70K m.w. polyanionic dextran (blue) and Tetragonolobus purpureas lectin (CY5) (red). The images show the presence of bacterial cells in the globular structures (at arrow) and a unique polymer (red) surrounding the cells (green), with an interstitial polymer of differing charge and chemistry (blue).
Figure 92P-LSM stereo projection of optical sections through globular structures stained with Ulex europeaus-FITC, showing details of the internal structure. The cellular space is indicated by the small arrow while a larger arrow points to the bundle structure of the surrounding polymer. Images are best viewed with a stereo viewer. (see also movie Supplemental Movie 3).
Relative abundance (percentage) of assorted neutral sugars in the methanol fed biofilm and reference river biofilm determined by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy.
| Reference | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
| Methanol | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Reference | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Methanol | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Figure 10(A–D) CLSM micrographs showing the effect of charge on the distribution of fluor-conjugated dextrans in the methanol biofilm. (A) neutral charge 10K m.w., rhodamine B conjugated dextran which binds to diffuse polymer regions between the globular structures (at arrows), (B) an anionic FITC conjugated 10K m.w., dextran, which binds more extensively to the diffuse polymer regions (at arrow), (C) binding of a polyanionic 10K m.w. dextran to a fibrous polymer region (at arrow) surrounding the globular structures, (D) binding of the hydrophobic dye Nile red to cell surfaces and cell clusters (at arrow) in the interstitial region surrounding the globular structures (at large arrow). (see also Supplemental Movie 4).
Figure 11(A–D) CLSM micrographs illustrating the existence of pH gradients within the methanol biofilms. (A) rhodamine signal, (B) fluorescein signal, (C) ratio image, (D) contour map of pH.