Guangtao Fu1, Shixun Li1, Nengtai Ouyang2, Junyan Wu3, Changchuan Li1, Wei Liu1, Junxiong Qiu1, Peng Peng1, Ling Qin4, Yue Ding1,5. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 2. Cellular & Molecular Diagnostics Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Pharmaceuticals, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 4. Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. 5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Aseptic loosening due to wear particle-induced osteolysis is the main cause of arthroplasty failure and the influence of postmenopausal osteoporosis and anti-osteoporosis treatment on Titanium (Ti) particle-induced osteolysis remains unclear. 66 C57BL/6J female mice were used in this study. Ovariectomy (OVX) was performed to induce osteopenia mice and confirmed by micro-CT. The Ti particle-induced mouse calvaria osteolysis model was established subsequently and both OVX and Sham-OVX mice were divided into four groups, respectively: Ti (-) group, Ti group, Ti + zoledronic acid (ZOL) group (50ug/kg, local administration, single dose) and Ti + teriparatide (TPTD) group (40ug/kg/d, subcutaneous injection*14d). Mice calvarias were collected for micro-CT and histomorphometric analysis 2 weeks after particle induction. 8 weeks after bilateral OVX, significantly reduced BMD and microstructure parameters in both proximal tibia and calvaria were observed in OVX mice when comparing with Sham-OVX mice. OVX mice in Ti group had not only markly decreased BMD and BV/TV, but also significantly increased total porosity, eroded surface area and osteoclast numbers when comparing with Sham-OVX mice. Shown by Two-way ANOVA analysis, the interaction terms between OVX and Ti implantation on micro-CT and histomorphometry parameters didn't reach significant difference. As illustrated by micro-CT and histological analysis, ZOL treatment markedly inhibited Ti particle-induced osteolysis in OVX mice and Sham-OVX mice, and there were significant differences when comparing to both Ti and Ti+TPTD group. The combination of osteoporosis and Ti particle implantation result in aggravated bone resorption, accompanied with increased osteoclasts and excessive inflammation response. ZOL was more effective in preventing Ti particle-induced osteolysis in both OVX mice and Sham-OVX mice than TPTD in short-term administration. ZOL exert the protective effects on Ti particle-induced bone loss via the suppression of osteoclasts.
Aseptic loosening due to wear particle-induced osteolysis is the main cause of arthroplasty failure and the influence of postmenopausal osteoporosis and anti-osteoporosis treatment on Titanium (Ti) particle-induced osteolysis remains unclear. 66 C57BL/6J female mice were used in this study. Ovariectomy (OVX) was performed to induce osteopeniamice and confirmed by micro-CT. The Ti particle-induced mousecalvaria osteolysis model was established subsequently and both OVX and Sham-OVX mice were divided into four groups, respectively: Ti (-) group, Ti group, Ti + zoledronic acid (ZOL) group (50ug/kg, local administration, single dose) and Ti + teriparatide (TPTD) group (40ug/kg/d, subcutaneous injection*14d). Mice calvarias were collected for micro-CT and histomorphometric analysis 2 weeks after particle induction. 8 weeks after bilateral OVX, significantly reduced BMD and microstructure parameters in both proximal tibia and calvaria were observed in OVX mice when comparing with Sham-OVX mice. OVX mice in Ti group had not only markly decreased BMD and BV/TV, but also significantly increased total porosity, eroded surface area and osteoclast numbers when comparing with Sham-OVX mice. Shown by Two-way ANOVA analysis, the interaction terms between OVX and Ti implantation on micro-CT and histomorphometry parameters didn't reach significant difference. As illustrated by micro-CT and histological analysis, ZOL treatment markedly inhibited Ti particle-induced osteolysis in OVX mice and Sham-OVX mice, and there were significant differences when comparing to both Ti and Ti+TPTD group. The combination of osteoporosis and Ti particle implantation result in aggravated bone resorption, accompanied with increased osteoclasts and excessive inflammation response. ZOL was more effective in preventing Ti particle-induced osteolysis in both OVX mice and Sham-OVX mice than TPTD in short-term administration. ZOL exert the protective effects on Ti particle-induced bone loss via the suppression of osteoclasts.
Postmenopausal osteoporosis is one of the most common primary bone metabolic disorders in elderly females, characterized by significant bone loss, deterioration of bone microarchitecture, and increased risk of fragility fractures 1. Commonly used antiosteoporosis drugs can be classified as antiresorptive and anabolic agents, while the representative drugs are zoledronate (ZOL) and teriparatide (TPTD), respectively. More than half of the females over 50 years suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lifetime and subsequently require huge number of orthopedic procedures, including total hip arthroplasty (THA) 2. It is reported that more than half of the patients undergoing THA are combined with osteoporosis 3. Being the most effective method for the treatment of end‐stage hip disease, the long‐term functional outcome of THA and the service life of prostheses are greatly limited by wear particle‐induced periprosthetic osteolysis and subsequent aseptic loosening, with the overall arthroplasty failure rate of 16% 20 years postoperation 4, 5. To date, the only established treatment for aseptic loosening is total hip revision, which is associated with not only significant medical cost but also technical difficulty and poor functional outcome. Fully understanding of the pathophysiology and new medicine treatment strategy for the prevention and treatment of aseptic loosening are strongly needed. Allowing the quantification of particle‐induced osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis, titanium (Ti) particle‐induced calvarial osteolysismice model is the most common used animal model in estimating the pathophysiology of wear particle‐induced periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening 6.Highly significant relationships were found between postoperative periprosthetic bone loss and preoperative bone mineral density (BMD) measured at spine, total hip, and total distal radius 7, 8. Recently, it was reported that female patients with low preoperative systemic BMD showed greater bone loss in femoral calcar after cementless THA 9. Low BMD was also reported to be associated with delayed osseointegration, accelerated implant migration, and worse initial stability 10, 11. Based on the results of former mentioned studies that preoperative BMD measured at spine, hip, and forearm were major factors influencing periprosthetic bone loss and implant micromotion, we proposed that osteoporosis is the risk factor of aseptic loosening. Previous studies demonstrated that antiosteoporosis treatment significantly inhibits wear particle‐induced osteoclast formation in vitro 12. Epidemiology data also revealed that the use of antiosteoporosis drugs markedly reduces the overall risk of revision after THA 13. However, the exact influence and mechanism of osteoporosis, antiresorptive, and anabolic agents on particle‐induced osteolysis in vivo still remains unclear. We hypothesized that the ovariectomy (OVX)‐induced osteopenia accelerates Ti particle‐induced calvarial osteolysis in mice, while antiresorptive and anabolic agents have protective effect on it.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
About 66 C57/BL6J female mice, aged 7–8 weeks, were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Research Center of Sun Yat‐Sen University. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sun Yat‐Sen University (approval No. IACUC‐DB‐16–0307), and the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals were strictly followed. Each of the mice weighed 20–25 g at the beginning of the study. All mice had free access to food and water.
Bilateral OVX
Six mice were randomly selected for micro‐CT scanning at proximal tibia as the baseline at the age of 12 weeks and the rest of the mice were randomly and equally divided into OVX group and Sham‐OVX group. Mice in both groups underwent surgeries under general anesthesia with pentobarbital (1%, 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection) at the age of 12 weeks. As previous described 14, the fallopian tube and the fat pad containing the ovary were removed on both sides and were stained by HE staining to confirm the success of OVX surgery in OVX group. In Sham‐OVX group, the ovaries were surgically identified but not removed. The skin incision was closed with absorbable sutures. About 8 weeks after operation, 6 mice were randomly selected from the OVX group and Sham‐OVX group for micro‐CT scanning at the proximal tibia.
Micro‐CT scanning at proximal tibia
All the mice selected for micro‐CT scanning were sacrificed and bilateral tibias were fixed in 10% formaldehyde after removal of all soft tissues. The fixed tibias were analyzed using micro‐CT (SkyScan 1176; SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium) at an isometric resolution of 18 µm. Images were acquired at 45 kV and 500 µA through a 0.2 mm‐thick aluminum filter with an exposure time of 240 ms. The manufacturer's software (NRecon, SkyScan) was used to reconstruct three‐dimensional (3D) images based on the radiographs. BMD (g/cm3) and morphometric parameters, including bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th, μm), and trabecular separation (Tb. Sp, μm) were measured from 1 to 2 mm distal to the growth plate of proximal tibias in the long axis. About 60 continuous sections were analyzed with CTAn software (SkyScan). Description and nomenclatures were strictly according to the guidelines for the assessment of bone microstructure using micro‐CT analysis 15.
Preparation of Ti particles
Commercial pure Ti particles were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). These particles were diluted with pure water and filtered by Millipore filter membranes (pore diameter: 1.0 μm, Billerica, MA, USA). Ti particles (diameter: 0.82 ± 0.12μm) were obtained after filtration. All Ti particles were washed with 75% ethanol and dried in a biological drying oven. The dried Ti particles were sterilized with ethylene oxide. The absence of endotoxin in Ti particles was confirmed by commercial limulus assay kit (QCl‐1000; Bio Whittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA). The Ti particles were stored in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C after being washed with sterile PBS for three times.
Ti particle‐induced mouse calvaria osteolysis model
The Ti particle‐induced mousecalvaria osteolysis model was established in the rest of the OVX (n = 24) and Sham‐OVX mice (n = 24) at the age of 20 weeks. Mice in both groups were subdivided into four groups: Ti (−) group, Ti group, Ti + ZOL group, and Ti + TPTD group, respectively. Animals underwent surgeries under anesthesia with pentobarbital (1%, 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection). As previously described 16, the hair overlying the skull was carefully shaved and the surgical field was sterilized with 75% ethanol for three times. After being exposed by making a 1 cm midline sagittal incision, the periosteum of the calvaria was scraped using a surgical scalpel in all groups. In Ti, Ti + ZOL, and Ti + TPTD group, 50 µL PBS containing 0.3 mg Ti particles was spread onto the center of the calvaria. In Ti + ZOL group, single dose 25 µL ZOL (50 µg/kg, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Stein, Switzerland) was injected into the space between the calvaria and the skin, which was modified from von Knoch's study 17. Ti + TPTD group received consecutive TPTD (rh [1-34] PTH, 40 µg/kg/day, as previous recommended 18, subcutaneous injection, Lilly, France) for 14 days. A similar volume (25 µL) of PBS was injected locally into calvaria of Ti group and Ti + TPTD group as well. Mice from Ti (−) group received 75 µL PBS without particles. The skin incision was closed with absorbable sutures. No mice died and no wound complications were observed during the experiments. Mice were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber 14 days after surgery, and the calvarias were harvested for micro‐CT scanning and histological analysis.
Micro‐CT imaging of mice calvaria
The harvested calvarias were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 2 days after the removal of all soft tissues. Then the fixed calvarias were analyzed by micro‐CT and associated analysis software as previously described. The scanning protocol was set at an isometric resolution of 18 μm, and radiographs were acquired at 45 kV and 500 µA through a 0.2 mm‐thick aluminum filter with an exposure time of 240 ms. The 3D image reconstructions were obtained using the manufacturer's software (NRecon, SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). As previously described 19, a square‐shaped region of interest (ROI) of 3 mm × 1 mm, with the midline suture in its center, was placed in the 2D reconstructed cross‐section slices in the middle of the sagittal suture on coronal plane. Then, ROIs were combined in order to form a volume of interest (VOI) of 3 mm × 1 mm × 3 mm for further quantitative analysis. BV/TV, BMD, and total porosity of each sample were obtained with CTAn software.
Histological and immunohistochemical analysis
All the calvarias were decalcified in 10% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 21 days and then embedded in paraffin after micro‐CT scanning. Cross‐sections (4 µm) were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), commercial tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering). Histological sections were analyzed using a standard high‐quality light microscope (DM2000, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at a magnification of 10× with the midline suture in its center. Histomorphometric analysis was performed on the most central section and four adjacent sections using image analysis software (Image Pro‐Plus 6.0, Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA). The region of interest (ROI) was defined as previously recommended 20. The eroded bone area (mm2) was determined by tracing the area of soft tissue between the parietal bones, including resorption pits on the superior surface of the calvaria. The number of osteoclasts and osteoblasts were determined within the ROI. As previous described 21, the presence of dark‐purple‐stained granules in the TRAP staining section, which located on the bone perimeter within a resorption lacuna, was defined as osteoclasts. The presence of dark gray‐stained granules within the cytoplasm in the ALP staining section was defined as osteoblasts. For histological detection of RANKL, TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and OPG (Abcam, Shanghai, China), sections were dewaxed using xylene, gradient ethanol, and PBS sequentially, followed by endogenous peroxidase blocking with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. Antigen retrieval was performed using citric acid with water bath at 60°C for 15 min, and then cooled to room temperature. After incubated with goat anti‐mouse IgG for 10 min at 37°C, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies for RANKL, TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and OPG at 4°C overnight. After washing, sections were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies at 37°C for 60 min. Coloration of sections were performed with 3,3‐diaminobenzidin (DAB), keeping at room temperature without light for 2 min. Rinsed sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The nomenclature and methods used were according to the recommendation of the Nomenclature Committee of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 22.
Statistical analysis
All quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All values were first assessed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to ensure normality and Gaussian distribution. Two‐sided Student's t‐test was used for the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti (−) and OVX‐Ti (−) group, and the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti and OVX‐Ti group. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the comparison among Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, Sham OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and Sham OVX‐Ti + TPTD group, and another ANOVA was used for the comparison among OVX‐Ti (−), OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and OVX‐Ti + TPTD group. Post hoc comparison between groups used the Fisher's protected least significant difference. Two‐way ANOVA containing Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti (−), and OVX‐Ti was performed to evaluate the effects due to OVX, effects due to Ti implantation and the interaction terms between OVX and Ti particle implantation on micro CT and histological parameters. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to carry out the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Micro‐CT scanning of proximal tibia
About 8 weeks after bilateral OVX, deterioration of the trabecular architecture in proximal tibia was readily observed in gross observation by 3D images (Fig. 1B). OVX mice had significantly reduced BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, and markedly increased Tb.Sp when compared to the mice at 12 weeks (Fig. 1B–D). Similar results were obtained when comparing with the mice at 20 weeks (Fig. 1B–D). Besides, we found no significant difference of the former mentioned parameters between the mice at 12 and 20 weeks.
Figure 1
Establishment of the OVX‐induced osteopenia mice model. (A) Representative micro‐CT 3D reconstructed images of proximal tibia obtained from each group (N = 6 per group). (B–D) Comparison of BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp. (N = 6 per group); * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, determined by one‐way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD) test. Error bars in the graph represent standard error. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Establishment of the OVX‐induced osteopeniamice model. (A) Representative micro‐CT 3D reconstructed images of proximal tibia obtained from each group (N = 6 per group). (B–D) Comparison of BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp. (N = 6 per group); * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, determined by one‐way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD) test. Error bars in the graph represent standard error. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Micro‐CT scanning of Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis
The 3D reconstruction images revealed that Ti particles induced profound changes in calvarial bone microarchitecture in both OVX and Sham‐OVX mice (Fig. 2). Quantitative analysis showed that OVX mice had significantly decreased BMD and BV/TV when comparing with Sham‐OVX mice in the Ti (−) group (Fig. 3A,B). More severe bone resorption was observed in the calvaria of OVX mice with stimulation of Ti particles when comparing with Sham‐OVX mice, with significantly decreased BMD and BV/TV, as well as increased total porosity (Fig. 3). Two‐way ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between OVX and Ti particle implantation on BMD, BV/TV, and total porosity did not reach significant levels. In addition, Ti particle‐induced bone resorption was markedly inhibited when treated with ZOL in both OVX mice and Sham‐OVX mice, with significant improvement of BMD, BV/TV, and total porosity (Fig. 4). However, there was only a significantly increased BMD in OVX mice when comparing with Ti group after 2 weeks TPTD administration (Fig. 4D). In addition, there were also significant differences between the Ti + ZOL and Ti+ TPTD group of BMD, BV/TV, and total porosity in OVX mice, and of BV/TV and total porosity in Sham‐OVX mice.
Figure 2
Representative micro‐CT 3D reconstructed images obtained from each groups (N = 6 per group). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Evaluation of the influence of OVX on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via micro CT quantitative analysis. BMD (A), BV/TV (B), and the total porosity (C) of each sample within the ROI were measured (N = 6 per group). Two‐sided Student's t‐test was used for the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti (−) and OVX‐Ti (−) group, and the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti and OVX‐Ti group. Two‐way ANOVA containing Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti (−), and OVX‐Ti was performed to evaluate the effects due to OVX, effects due to Ti implantation and the interaction terms between OVX and Ti particle implantation. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Figure 4
Evaluation of the effect of ZOL and TPTD on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via micro‐CT quantitative analysis. N = 6 per group. One‐way ANOVA was used for the comparison among Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, Sham OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and Sham OVX‐Ti + TPTD group, and there were another ANOVA for the comparison among OVX‐Ti (−), OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and OVX‐Ti + TPTD group. Post hoc comparison between groups used the Fisher's protected least significant difference. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, when comparing to Ti group. # indicated P < 0.05 and ## indicated P < 0.01 in the comparison between Ti + ZOL and Ti + TPTD group. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Representative micro‐CT 3D reconstructed images obtained from each groups (N = 6 per group). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]Evaluation of the influence of OVX on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via micro CT quantitative analysis. BMD (A), BV/TV (B), and the total porosity (C) of each sample within the ROI were measured (N = 6 per group). Two‐sided Student's t‐test was used for the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti (−) and OVX‐Ti (−) group, and the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti and OVX‐Ti group. Two‐way ANOVA containing Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti (−), and OVX‐Ti was performed to evaluate the effects due to OVX, effects due to Ti implantation and the interaction terms between OVX and Ti particle implantation. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.Evaluation of the effect of ZOL and TPTD on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via micro‐CT quantitative analysis. N = 6 per group. One‐way ANOVA was used for the comparison among Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, Sham OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and Sham OVX‐Ti + TPTD group, and there were another ANOVA for the comparison among OVX‐Ti (−), OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and OVX‐Ti + TPTD group. Post hoc comparison between groups used the Fisher's protected least significant difference. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, when comparing to Ti group. # indicated P < 0.05 and ## indicated P < 0.01 in the comparison between Ti + ZOL and Ti + TPTD group. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Bone histomorphometry
As illustrated by H&E and TRAP staining, Ti particles induced erosion of the calvarial bone with intense inflammatory infiltration and multiple TRAP positive cells accumulating along the eroded bone surface when compared with Ti (−) group in both OVX and Sham‐OVX mice (Fig. 5A,B). More severe bone erosion and more TRAP positive cells were also observed in OVX mice than in Sham‐OVX mice when stimulated with Ti particles (Fig. 6A,B). Two‐way ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between OVX and Ti particle implantation on bone erosion area and TRAP positive cell numbers did not reach a significant level. Consistent with the micro‐CT quantification, the tissue response to Ti particles appeared limited in both OVX and Sham‐OVX mice when treated with ZOL, with significant reduction of eroded surface area and TRAP positive cell number (Fig. 7). Histomorphometric results also revealed that there was significant decrease in eroded surface area in Ti + TPTD group (Fig.7A, D). In addition, there were also significant differences between the Ti + ZOL and Ti+ TPTD group of TRAP positive cell numbers in OVX mice, and of eroded bone area and TRAP positive cell numbers in Sham‐OVX mice. We found that there were only a small amount of osteoblasts within the ROI in all mice (Fig. 5C), with no significant difference of the number of ALP positive cells between all the groups (Fig. 7C,F).
Figure 5
Representative histological slices of HE staining (A), TRAP staining (B), and ALP staining (C) obtained from each group at a magnification of 10×. (N = 6 per group). The blue arrows indicate osteoclasts (B) and osteoblasts (C). Scale bar: 100 µm. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 6
Evaluation of the effect of OVX on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via histomorphometric analysis. The eroded surface area (A), the number of TRAP positive multinucleated osteoclasts (B), and the number of ALP positive osteoblasts (C) within the ROI were measured (N = 6 per group). Two‐sided Student's t‐test was used for the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti (−) and OVX‐Ti (−) group, and the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti and OVX‐Ti group. Two‐way ANOVA containing Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti (−), and OVX‐Ti was performed to evaluated the effects due to OVX, effects due to Ti implantation and the interaction terms between OVX and Ti particle implantation. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Figure 7
Evaluation of the effect of ZOL and TPTD on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via histomorphometric analysis. N = 6 per group. One‐way ANOVA was used for the comparison among Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, Sham OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and Sham OVX‐Ti + TPTD group, and another ANOVA was used for the comparison among OVX‐Ti (−), OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and OVX‐Ti + TPTD group. Post hoc comparison between groups used the Fisher's protected least significant difference. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, when comparing to Ti group. # indicated P < 0.05 and ## indicated P < 0.01 in the comparison between Ti + ZOL and Ti + TPTD group. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Representative histological slices of HE staining (A), TRAP staining (B), and ALP staining (C) obtained from each group at a magnification of 10×. (N = 6 per group). The blue arrows indicate osteoclasts (B) and osteoblasts (C). Scale bar: 100 µm. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]Evaluation of the effect of OVX on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via histomorphometric analysis. The eroded surface area (A), the number of TRAP positive multinucleated osteoclasts (B), and the number of ALP positive osteoblasts (C) within the ROI were measured (N = 6 per group). Two‐sided Student's t‐test was used for the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti (−) and OVX‐Ti (−) group, and the comparison between Sham OVX‐Ti and OVX‐Ti group. Two‐way ANOVA containing Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti (−), and OVX‐Ti was performed to evaluated the effects due to OVX, effects due to Ti implantation and the interaction terms between OVX and Ti particle implantation. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.Evaluation of the effect of ZOL and TPTD on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis via histomorphometric analysis. N = 6 per group. One‐way ANOVA was used for the comparison among Sham OVX‐Ti (−), Sham OVX‐Ti, Sham OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and Sham OVX‐Ti + TPTD group, and another ANOVA was used for the comparison among OVX‐Ti (−), OVX‐Ti, OVX‐Ti + ZOL, and OVX‐Ti + TPTD group. Post hoc comparison between groups used the Fisher's protected least significant difference. * indicated P < 0.05 and ** indicated P < 0.01, when comparing to Ti group. # indicated P < 0.05 and ## indicated P < 0.01 in the comparison between Ti + ZOL and Ti + TPTD group. Error bars in the graph represent standard error.
Immunochemical analysis of TNF‐α, RANKL, IL‐1β, and OPG
Localizing primarily in the inflammatory cells around the eroded bone surface, positive staining of TNF‐α, RANKL, and IL‐1β were observed in Ti group and seemed more obvious in OVX mice (Fig. 8). After ZOL treatment, few positive staining reactions for these inflammatory cytokines were observed in either OVX or Sham‐OVX mice, while there was a slightly increased expression of OPG (Fig. 8). There were still positive staining of OPG, TNF‐α, RANKL, and IL‐1β in both OVX and Sham‐OVX mice after TPTD treatment.
Figure 8
Immunohistochemical staining for TNF‐α (A), RANKL (B), IL‐1β (C), and OPG (D) in mouse calvaria (N = 6 per group). Scale bar: 100 µm. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Immunohistochemical staining for TNF‐α (A), RANKL (B), IL‐1β (C), and OPG (D) in mouse calvaria (N = 6 per group). Scale bar: 100 µm. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
DISCUSSION
A 12‐week‐old mouse is sexually mature and capable of responding appropriately to OVX 23. In the present study, severe deterioration of the trabecular architecture in proximal tibia and significant decrease of BMD and BV/TV in calvaria were observed in OVX mice without Ti particle stimulation, which demonstrated that the OVX‐induced osteopeniamice model was successfully established, with both tibia and calvaria affected. Afterward, we compared the Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis of C57/BL6J female OVX mice with age‐matched Sham‐OVX mice. As expected, the presence of Ti particles induced profound changes in calvarial bone of both OVX and Sham‐OVX mice, which was consistent with previous studies 6. Previous research showed that the chronic inflammatory response to wear particles involving macrophages, osteoclasts and osteoblasts plays a pivotal role in the initiation and development of aseptic loosening 24, 25. Macrophages produce more proinflammatory cytokines (TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, and RANKL) after Ti particle stimulation. The upgraded proinflammatory cytokines secretion induces differentiation and activation of osteoclasts and subsequent osteolysis, which is regulated by the size, shape, and density of the wear particles 26, 27. Moreover, a large number of macrophages with massive expression of Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) had been found in the synovial membrane samples from aseptic loosening patients, indicating that wear particles might activate the macrophages through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) 28. However, the exact mechanism of particle‐induced osteolysis is not entirely clear and further investigation is needed.Illustrated by micro‐CT and histology, Ti particle‐induced osteolysis in the calvarial bone was much more obvious in OVX mice when comparing with Sham‐OVX mice. However, the results reported by Nich's group are not entirely consistent with ours 29, 30, 31. Those studies performed the surgery for building the particle‐induced mousecalvaria osteolysis model just 1 week after bilateral OVX, without using micro‐CT to confirm the establishment of osteopenicmouse model by comparing the BMD and microstructure parameters of OVX mice to Sham‐OVX mice. It is well known that BMD measurement is essential for the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and results of most studies indicated that it takes 7–9 weeks to build the osteopenicmouse model after OVX 32, 33, which is consistent with our study. Thus, we consider that Nich's studies actually built the animal model of estrogen deficiency, rather than osteopenia, which could not demonstrate the exact influence of osteopenia on particle‐induced osteolysis in mice. It was reported that estrogen has both pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory properties, which is dependent on situation (i.e., doses and estrogen receptor distribution) 34, 35. That may be another reasonable explanation for the inconsistent results between ours and Nich's study. However, the present study could not come to the conclusion that osteopenia played a role on Ti particle‐induced osteolysis, as the interaction term on micro‐CT and histomorphometry measurement did not reach significant difference. Further animal and clinical studies are underway to further investigate this issue.In the present study, OVX mice in the Ti group had more osteoclasts within the ROI than the Sham‐OVX mice, with significantly aggravated bone resorption. In view of the critical role that osteoclasts play in the initiation of both wear particle‐induced osteolysis and osteoporosis‐related bone loss 1, 25, we considered that the aggravation of osteolysis on calvarial bone in OVX mice is associated with increased osteoclastogenesis after the combination of two inflammation‐ related bone resorptive situations. Previous study also had similar results that postmenopausal osteoporosis enhanced inflammation‐induced bone remodeling with increased osteoclast activity 36. RANKL is one of the essential cytokines required for osteoclasts formation, which promotes the differentiation of osteoclast precursors into fully mature multinucleated osteoclasts and stimulates the capacity of mature osteoclasts to resorb bone 37. The unbalance between RANKL and OPG is indicated as the pivotal mechanism of both estrogen deficiency bone loss and particle‐induced osteolysis through controlling the activation state of osteoclasts 24, 37, 38. It was recently reported that inhibition of RANKL‐induced osteoclastogenesis prevents both OVX‐induced osteoporosis and wear particle‐induced osteolysis 39. Additional inflammatory cytokines are reported to be responsible for the up‐regulation of osteoclasts formation, and those most involved in bone loss appear to be TNF‐α and IL‐1β. TNF‐α is considered to act by increasing RANKL expression in macrophages and stromal cells, which is up regulated by IL‐1β 40. Further studies also supported the critical role of pro‐inflammation factors in both particle‐induced osteolysis and postmenopausal osteoporosis 24, 41. Illustrated by immunohistochemical analysis, positive staining of TNF‐α, RANKL, and IL‐1β were observed in the Ti group, which seems more obvious in OVX mice. According to the present study, we considered that the combination of two bone resorptive situations might result in an excessive inflammation response with local upgraded pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Quantitative analysis is needed to further investigation of the involvement of inflammation cytokines.ZOL is a widely used third‐generation bisphosphonate, which has been proven to be a useful antiresorptive agent for postmenopausal women via the suppression of the osteoclasts activity 42. As illustrated by micro‐CT and histology, we found that ZOL treatment markedly inhibited bone resorption induced by Ti particles in both OVX mice and Sham‐OVX mice. Epidemiology data showed that the use of bisphosphonates markedly reduces the risk of revision after THA 13, which is consistent with the findings of the present study. Bisphosphonate inhibits bone resorption mostly by reducing the activity of osteoclasts through inhibiting farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase activity and by reducing the population of osteoclast precursor cells 43. However, the exact mechanism of the protective effect of ZOL on particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis in OVX mice has not yet been entirely clarified. The current study found that ZOL significantly reduced the number of TRAP positive cells in both OVX mice and Sham‐OVX mice when comparing with the Ti group, which was consist with previous study 44. Thus, we proposed that the ZOL exert the protective effects on Ti particle‐induced bone loss via the suppression of osteoclasts. Illustrated by immunochemical analysis, there was increase expression of OPG and marked inhibition of the expression of RANKL, TNF‐α, and IL‐1β after ZOL treatment. It was reported that ZOL inhibited the recruitment and differentiation of osteoclasts by reducing transmembrane RANKL expression and increasing OPG secretion in osteoblasts‐like cells 45. The secretion of TNF‐α of macrophages (RAW264.7) stimulated by wear particles could be reduced by alendronate, another bisphosphonate 12. Taken together, we considered that the ZOL exerts an anti‐inflammation effect in addition to its direct effects on mature osteoclasts, which represents another potential cause of the protective effects on Ti particle‐induced bone loss.TPTD is an anabolic drug that works primarily through remodeling, which firstly requires activation of osteoclasts to resorb bone, followed by replacing more bone than removed through the stimulation of osteoblast activity to achieve a net increase in bone mass 46. It was reported that daily injection with TPTD (40 mg/kg/day) for 7 weeks significantly enhanced femoral bone strength, which was associated with improvement of femoral BMD, bone markers, and bone structure 18. In addition, several clinical case reports found that patients diagnosed with prosthetic aseptic loosening experience clinical improvement with disappearance of radiographic signs of loosening after 6–8 months TPTD treatment, indicating that TPTD may be a potential new alternative treatment for the prevention of particle‐induced periprosthetic osteolysis and sequential aseptic loosening 47, 48. However, results of the present study indicated that 2 weeks of TPTD treatment could not inhibit the Ti particle‐induced bone resorption in OVX and Sham‐OVX mice as effective as ZOL, which was contradictory with our hypothesis. As TPTD treatment aimed at osteoporosis prevention or fracture healing promotion in mice model mostly lasted for 4–6 weeks 49, 50, we hypothesized that the unsatisfactory protective effect on Ti particle‐induced calvaria osteolysis of TPTD in the present study may due to the insufficient duration of treatment. Further animal studies are underway to test this hypothesis with prolonged duration (i.e., 4–6 weeks) of TPTD administration.This study was subjected to some limitations. Firstly, the osteolysis process lasted for only 2 weeks, representing an acute inflammatory process rather than a chronic one. Thus, the clinical relevance of the murine calvaria model should be considered with caution. Secondly, it was reported that ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particles are the main cause of periprosthetic osteolysis 12. However, it was found that Ti particles could also effectively activate osteoclast formation and function to induce osteolysis in vivo, remaining one of the crucial causes of aseptic loosening 16, 51. Thus, we believe that both Ti particles and UHMWPE particle‐induced models are suitable to investigate the effects of osteoporosis and antiosteoporosis treatment on bone resorption. Lastly, drugs with same administration method are more comparable. In the present study, ZOL was given in a single dose and the TPTD was given consecutively, which was based on the clinical practice. The method of TPTD administration is consistent with other in vivo studies using mouse models 18, 49. Local administration is also common in studies evaluating the inflammatory effect of bisphosphonate drugs and prevention effect of ZOL on particle‐induced osteolysis 17, 52. There are also many studies comparing the effect of single dose ZOL and consecutive administration of TPTD on bone structure, osteoporotic fracture healing and the prevention of disuse osteopenia in small animal models 53, 54, 55. Taken together, we supposed that the way we compared those two drugs is acceptable and interpretable, which can provide preliminary research foundation for clinical considerations.
CONCLUSION
The combination of osteoporosis and Ti particle implantation resulted in aggravated bone resorption, accompanied with increased osteoclasts and excessive inflammation response. ZOL was more effective in preventing Ti particle‐induced osteolysis in both OVX mice and Sham‐OVX mice than TPTD in short‐term administration. ZOL exerts protective effects on Ti particle‐induced bone loss via the suppression of osteoclasts.
Author Contributions
Study design and approved the final version: Yue Ding. Drafting and revising the manuscript content: Guangtao Fu. Study conduct: Guangtao Fu, Shixun Li and Nengtai Ouyang. Counseling of the administration of antiosteoporosis drugs on mice: Junyan Wu. Data collection: Changchuan Li, Junxiong Qiu, Data analysis: Wei Liu, Peng Peng. Coordination and assistance in article preparation: Ling Qin. Yue Ding takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
Conflict of Interest
Guangtao Fu, Shixun Li, Nengtai Ouyang, Junyan Wu, Changchuan Li, Wei Liu, Junxiong Qiu, Peng Peng, Ling Qin, and Yue Ding declare that they have no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work. There is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.
Authors: Akiko Iida-Klein; Christine Hughes; Shi Shou Lu; Annette Moreno; Victor Shen; David W Dempster; Felicia Cosman; Robert Lindsay Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: F von Knoch; C Wedemeyer; A Heckelei; C Sprecher; G Saxler; G Hilken; F Henschke; M von Knoch; H Bereiter; F Löer; M von Knoch Journal: Biomed Tech (Berl) Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 1.411
Authors: Marius von Knoch; Christian Wedemeyer; Andreas Pingsmann; Fabian von Knoch; Gero Hilken; Christoph Sprecher; Frank Henschke; Bertram Barden; Franz Löer Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Beiqing Pan; Amanda N Farrugia; Luen Bik To; David M Findlay; Jonathan Green; Kevin Lynch; Andrew C W Zannettino Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: M von Knoch; D E Jewison; J D Sibonga; R T Turner; B F Morrey; F Loer; D J Berry; S P Scully Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.479