Jasna Aleksova1,2,3, Alexander J Rodriguez4,5, Robert McLachlan6,7,4, Peter Kerr4,8, Frances Milat6,7,4, Peter R Ebeling6,4. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd. Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia. jasna.aleksova@hudson.org.au. 2. Hudson Institute of Medical Reearch, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia. jasna.aleksova@hudson.org.au. 3. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. jasna.aleksova@hudson.org.au. 4. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Bone & Muscle Health Research Group, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd. Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia. 7. Hudson Institute of Medical Reearch, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greatly increased fracture risk compared with the general population. Gonadal hormones have an important influence on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk, and hormone therapies can significantly improve these outcomes. Gonadal dysfunction is a frequent finding in patients with CKD; yet, little is known about the impact of gonadal hormones in the pathogenesis and treatment of bone health in patients with CKD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of gonadal hormones and hormone therapies on bone outcomes in men and women with CKD. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched from inception to February 14, 2018 for studies that assessed gonadal hormones or hormone treatments with bone outcomes in patients with CKD stage 3-5D. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of search results according to inclusion criteria and assessed study quality and risk of bias using validated assessment tools. RECENT FINDINGS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six moderate-to-high quality observational studies showed inconsistent association between any gonadal hormone and bone outcomes, limited by significant study heterogeneity. Five moderate-high risk of bias interventional studies examined treatment with selective oestrogen receptor modulators in post-menopausal women (four using raloxifene and one bazedoxifene) and demonstrated variable effects on BMD and fracture outcomes. Meta-analysis of raloxifene treatment in post-menopausal women demonstrated improvement in lumbar spine (SMD 3.30; 95% CI 3.21-3.38) and femoral neck (SMD 3.29; 95% CI 3.21-3.36) BMD compared with placebo. Transdermal oestradiol/norethisterone in pre-menopausal women receiving dialysis (n = 1 study), demonstrated BMD improvement over 12 months. Testosterone treatment for 6 months in dialysis-dependant men (n = 1 study) did not improve BMD. There is evidence that raloxifene treatment may be beneficial in improving BMD in post-menopausal women with CKD. There is insufficient evidence for other hormone treatments in men or women. Despite high fracture rates and frequent gonadal dysfunction in patients with CKD, significant evidence gaps exist, and well-designed studies are required to specifically assess the impact of gonadal status in the pathogenesis of CKD-related bone fragility and its treatment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greatly increased fracture risk compared with the general population. Gonadal hormones have an important influence on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk, and hormone therapies can significantly improve these outcomes. Gonadal dysfunction is a frequent finding in patients with CKD; yet, little is known about the impact of gonadal hormones in the pathogenesis and treatment of bone health in patients with CKD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of gonadal hormones and hormone therapies on bone outcomes in men and women with CKD. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched from inception to February 14, 2018 for studies that assessed gonadal hormones or hormone treatments with bone outcomes in patients with CKD stage 3-5D. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of search results according to inclusion criteria and assessed study quality and risk of bias using validated assessment tools. RECENT FINDINGS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six moderate-to-high quality observational studies showed inconsistent association between any gonadal hormone and bone outcomes, limited by significant study heterogeneity. Five moderate-high risk of bias interventional studies examined treatment with selective oestrogen receptor modulators in post-menopausal women (four using raloxifene and one bazedoxifene) and demonstrated variable effects on BMD and fracture outcomes. Meta-analysis of raloxifene treatment in post-menopausal women demonstrated improvement in lumbar spine (SMD 3.30; 95% CI 3.21-3.38) and femoral neck (SMD 3.29; 95% CI 3.21-3.36) BMD compared with placebo. Transdermal oestradiol/norethisterone in pre-menopausal women receiving dialysis (n = 1 study), demonstrated BMD improvement over 12 months. Testosterone treatment for 6 months in dialysis-dependant men (n = 1 study) did not improve BMD. There is evidence that raloxifene treatment may be beneficial in improving BMD in post-menopausal women with CKD. There is insufficient evidence for other hormone treatments in men or women. Despite high fracture rates and frequent gonadal dysfunction in patients with CKD, significant evidence gaps exist, and well-designed studies are required to specifically assess the impact of gonadal status in the pathogenesis of CKD-related bone fragility and its treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Chronic kidney disease; Fractures; Hormone replacement therapy; Hypogonadism; Selective oestrogen receptor modulators
Authors: Sophie A Jamal; Douglas C Bauer; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Marc Hochberg; Areef Ishani; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Giovanni Corona; Giulia Rastrelli; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Alessandra Sforza; Edoardo Mannucci; Mario Maggi Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: N Sugiya; A Nakashima; N Takasugi; A Kawai; K Kiribayashi; J Tanaka; N Kohno; N Yorioka Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: A M Alem; D J Sherrard; D L Gillen; N S Weiss; S A Beresford; S R Heckbert; C Wong; C Stehman-Breen Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Howard A Fink; Susan K Ewing; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Areef Ishani; Terri Blackwell; Sophie A Jamal; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: M Abdalbary; M Sobh; S Elnagar; M A Elhadedy; N Elshabrawy; M Abdelsalam; K Asadipooya; A Sabry; A Halawa; A El-Husseini Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 5.071