BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is commonly used for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data are limited examining the outcomes of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. We evaluate the impact of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We evaluated a single-center prospective registry of patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI between 8/2011 and 6/2016. Patients with systolic dysfunction (EF < 55%) between the time of AF diagnosis and their cryoballoon PVI procedure were assessed for AF recurrence at 6 months and 1 year post-procedure, with a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Final analysis included 66 patients with systolic dysfunction undergoing cryoballoon PVI. An AF diagnosis for ≥ 1 year prior to PVI was present in 62.1% (n = 41), and 53.0% (n = 35) had systolic dysfunction for ≥ 1 year pre-procedure. The proportion of AF-free patients at 1 year was 51.5%. Of patients with echocardiograms performed at 1 year (n = 43), a greater proportion of individuals without AF recurrence had an improvement in EF of ≥ 10% than in those with AF recurrence (54.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.039). Of the patients who had systolic dysfunction at the time of the ablation (EF < 55%), there was a significant increase in EF post-procedure (36.5% pre-procedure vs. 48.3% post-procedure, mean change 11.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with systolic dysfunction, cryoballoon PVI provides an acceptable AF recurrence-free rate at 1 year. AF recurrence-free individuals were more likely to have improvement in EF. Further evaluation is needed to determine the potential role of early cryoballoon PVI in patients with a new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction and AF.
BACKGROUND:Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is commonly used for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data are limited examining the outcomes of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. We evaluate the impact of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We evaluated a single-center prospective registry of patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI between 8/2011 and 6/2016. Patients with systolic dysfunction (EF < 55%) between the time of AF diagnosis and their cryoballoon PVI procedure were assessed for AF recurrence at 6 months and 1 year post-procedure, with a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Final analysis included 66 patients with systolic dysfunction undergoing cryoballoon PVI. An AF diagnosis for ≥ 1 year prior to PVI was present in 62.1% (n = 41), and 53.0% (n = 35) had systolic dysfunction for ≥ 1 year pre-procedure. The proportion of AF-freepatients at 1 year was 51.5%. Of patients with echocardiograms performed at 1 year (n = 43), a greater proportion of individuals without AF recurrence had an improvement in EF of ≥ 10% than in those with AF recurrence (54.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.039). Of the patients who had systolic dysfunction at the time of the ablation (EF < 55%), there was a significant increase in EF post-procedure (36.5% pre-procedure vs. 48.3% post-procedure, mean change 11.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with systolic dysfunction, cryoballoon PVI provides an acceptable AF recurrence-free rate at 1 year. AF recurrence-free individuals were more likely to have improvement in EF. Further evaluation is needed to determine the potential role of early cryoballoon PVI in patients with a new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction and AF.
Authors: Ross J Hunter; Thomas J Berriman; Ihab Diab; Ravindu Kamdar; Laura Richmond; Victoria Baker; Farai Goromonzi; Vinit Sawhney; Edward Duncan; Stephen P Page; Waqas Ullah; Beth Unsworth; Jamil Mayet; Mehul Dhinoja; Mark J Earley; Simon Sporton; Richard J Schilling Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-01
Authors: Alvaro V Sarabanda; T Jared Bunch; Susan B Johnson; Srijoy Mahapatra; Mark A Milton; Luiz R Leite; G Keith Bruce; Douglas L Packer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric P Leip; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joanne M Murabito; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gunnar Klein; Hanno Oswald; Ajmal Gardiwal; Ulrich Lüsebrink; Christoph Lissel; Hong Yu; Helmut Drexler Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-02-16 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Luigi Di Biase; Prasant Mohanty; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Pasquale Santangeli; Chintan Trivedi; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Madhu Reddy; Pierre Jais; Sakis Themistoclakis; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella; Gemma Pelargonio; Maria Lucia Narducci; Robert Schweikert; Petr Neuzil; Javier Sanchez; Rodney Horton; Salwa Beheiry; Richard Hongo; Steven Hao; Antonio Rossillo; Giovanni Forleo; Claudio Tondo; J David Burkhardt; Michel Haissaguerre; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mohammed N Khan; Pierre Jaïs; Jennifer Cummings; Luigi Di Biase; Prashanthan Sanders; David O Martin; Josef Kautzner; Steven Hao; Sakis Themistoclakis; Raffaele Fanelli; Domenico Potenza; Raimondo Massaro; Oussama Wazni; Robert Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Paul Wang; Amin Al-Ahmad; Salwa Beheiry; Pietro Santarelli; Randall C Starling; Antonio Dello Russo; Gemma Pelargonio; Johannes Brachmann; Volker Schibgilla; Aldo Bonso; Michela Casella; Antonio Raviele; Michel Haïssaguerre; Andrea Natale Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas Neumann; Jürgen Vogt; Burghard Schumacher; Anja Dorszewski; Malte Kuniss; Hans Neuser; Klaus Kurzidim; Alexander Berkowitsch; Marcus Koller; Johannes Heintze; Ursula Scholz; Ulrike Wetzel; Michael A E Schneider; Dieter Horstkotte; Christian W Hamm; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Karl-Heinz Kuck; Josep Brugada; Alexander Fürnkranz; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; K R Julian Chun; Arif Elvan; Thomas Arentz; Kurt Bestehorn; Stuart J Pocock; Jean-Paul Albenque; Claudio Tondo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 91.245