Elizabeth Hope Cain1, Ashirbani Saha2, Michael R Harowicz2,3, Jeffrey R Marks4, P Kelly Marcom5, Maciej A Mazurowski2,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Elizabeth.cain@duke.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. 6. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether a multivariate machine learning-based model using computer-extracted features of pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 288 breast cancer patients at our institution who received NAT and had a pre-treatment breast MRI. A comprehensive set of 529 radiomic features was extracted from each patient's pre-treatment MRI. The patients were divided into equal groups to form a training set and an independent test set. Two multivariate machine learning models (logistic regression and a support vector machine) based on imaging features were trained to predict pCR in (a) all patients with NAT, (b) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and (c) triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (TN/HER2+) patients who had NAT. The multivariate models were tested using the independent test set, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of the 288 patients, 64 achieved pCR. The AUC values for predicting pCR in TN/HER+ patients who received NAT were significant (0.707, 95% CI 0.582-0.833, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate models based on pre-treatment MRI features were able to predict pCR in TN/HER2+ patients.
PURPOSE: To determine whether a multivariate machine learning-based model using computer-extracted features of pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancerpatients. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 288 breast cancerpatients at our institution who received NAT and had a pre-treatment breast MRI. A comprehensive set of 529 radiomic features was extracted from each patient's pre-treatment MRI. The patients were divided into equal groups to form a training set and an independent test set. Two multivariate machine learning models (logistic regression and a support vector machine) based on imaging features were trained to predict pCR in (a) all patients with NAT, (b) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and (c) triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (TN/HER2+) patients who had NAT. The multivariate models were tested using the independent test set, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of the 288 patients, 64 achieved pCR. The AUC values for predicting pCR in TN/HER+ patients who received NAT were significant (0.707, 95% CI 0.582-0.833, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate models based on pre-treatment MRI features were able to predict pCR in TN/HER2+ patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Breast cancer MRI; Logistic regression; MRI radiomics; Machine learning; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pathologic complete response; Support vector machines
Authors: M Kaufmann; G von Minckwitz; H D Bear; A Buzdar; P McGale; H Bonnefoi; M Colleoni; C Denkert; W Eiermann; R Jackesz; A Makris; W Miller; J-Y Pierga; V Semiglazov; A Schneeweiss; R Souchon; V Stearns; M Untch; S Loibl Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Keith N Ogston; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Ian Smith; Leslie G Walker; Oleg Eremin Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: L Esserman; E Kaplan; S Partridge; D Tripathy; H Rugo; J Park; S Hwang; H Kuerer; D Sudilovsky; Y Lu; N Hylton Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J A van der Hage; C J van de Velde; J P Julien; M Tubiana-Hulin; C Vandervelden; L Duchateau Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Fiona J Gilbert; Antoinne K Ah-See; Oleg Eremin; Leslie G Walker; Tarun K Sarkar; S Peter Eggleton; Keith N Ogston Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cornelia Liedtke; Chafika Mazouni; Kenneth R Hess; Fabrice André; Attila Tordai; Jaime A Mejia; W Fraser Symmans; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Massimo Cristofanilli; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karen Drukker; Alexandra Edwards; Christopher Doyle; John Papaioannou; Kirti Kulkarni; Maryellen L Giger Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Elizabeth J Sutton; Natsuko Onishi; Duc A Fehr; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Meredith Sadinski; Katja Pinker; Danny F Martinez; Edi Brogi; Lior Braunstein; Pedram Razavi; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Virgilio Sacchini; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris; Harini Veeraraghavan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: N M H Verbakel; A Ibrahim; M L Smidt; H C Woodruff; R W Y Granzier; J E van Timmeren; T J A van Nijnatten; R T H Leijenaar; M B I Lobbes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 4.379