Philipp Lohmann1, Pantelis Stavrinou2, Katharina Lipke3, Elena K Bauer4, Garry Ceccon4, Jan-Michael Werner4, Bernd Neumaier3, Gereon R Fink3,4, Nadim J Shah3,5, Karl-Josef Langen3,6, Norbert Galldiks3,4,7. 1. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany. p.lohmann@fz-juelich.de. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 3. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 5. Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. 7. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Areas of contrast enhancement (CE) on MRI are usually the target for resection or radiotherapy target volume definition in glioblastomas. However, the solid tumour mass may extend beyond areas of CE. Amino acid PET can detect parts of the tumour that show no CE. We systematically investigated tumour volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma. METHODS: Preoperatively, 50 patients with neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced MRI. Areas of CE were manually segmented. FET PET tumour volumes were segmented using a tumour-to-brain ratio of ≥1.6. The percentage overlap volumes, and Dice and Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC, JSC) were calculated. FLAIR images were evaluated visually. RESULTS: In 43 patients (86%), the FET tumour volume was significantly larger than the CE volume (21.5 ± 14.3 mL vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients (80%) showed both increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40 patients, the spatial similarity between FET uptake and CE was low (mean DSC 0.39 ± 0.21, mean JSC 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten patients (20%) showed no CE, and one of these patients showed no FET uptake. In five patients (10%), increased FET uptake was present outside areas of FLAIR hyperintensity. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the metabolically active tumour volume delineated by FET PET is significantly larger than tumour volume delineated by CE. Furthermore, the results strongly suggest that the information derived from both imaging modalities should be integrated into the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
PURPOSE: Areas of contrast enhancement (CE) on MRI are usually the target for resection or radiotherapy target volume definition in glioblastomas. However, the solid tumour mass may extend beyond areas of CE. Amino acid PET can detect parts of the tumour that show no CE. We systematically investigated tumour volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma. METHODS: Preoperatively, 50 patients with neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced MRI. Areas of CE were manually segmented. FET PET tumour volumes were segmented using a tumour-to-brain ratio of ≥1.6. The percentage overlap volumes, and Dice and Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC, JSC) were calculated. FLAIR images were evaluated visually. RESULTS: In 43 patients (86%), the FET tumour volume was significantly larger than the CE volume (21.5 ± 14.3 mL vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients (80%) showed both increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40 patients, the spatial similarity between FET uptake and CE was low (mean DSC 0.39 ± 0.21, mean JSC 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten patients (20%) showed no CE, and one of these patients showed no FET uptake. In five patients (10%), increased FET uptake was present outside areas of FLAIR hyperintensity. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the metabolically active tumour volume delineated by FET PET is significantly larger than tumour volume delineated by CE. Furthermore, the results strongly suggest that the information derived from both imaging modalities should be integrated into the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amino acid PET; FET PET tumour volume; FLAIR hyperintensity; MRI contrast enhancement; Target volume definition; Volumetry
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Abigail E Besemer; Benjamin Titz; Joseph J Grudzinski; Jamey P Weichert; John S Kuo; H Ian Robins; Lance T Hall; Bryan P Bednarz Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: M Mosskin; K Ericson; T Hindmarsh; H von Holst; V P Collins; M Bergström; L Eriksson; P Johnström Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 1989 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Roland Ullrich; Michael Schroeter; Gereon R Fink; Andreas H Jacobs; Lutz W Kracht Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Benoit J M Pirotte; Marc Levivier; Serge Goldman; Nicolas Massager; David Wikler; Olivier Dewitte; Michael Bruneau; Sandrine Rorive; Philippe David; Jacques Brotchi Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Oliver Oehlke; Michael Mix; Erika Graf; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; Ursula Nestle; Irina Götz; Sabine Schneider-Fuchs; Astrid Weyerbrock; Irina Mader; Brigitta G Baumert; Susan C Short; Philipp T Meyer; Wolfgang A Weber; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Lena Kaiser; Adrien Holzgreve; Stefanie Quach; Michael Ingrisch; Marcus Unterrainer; Franziska J Dekorsy; Simon Lindner; Viktoria Ruf; Julia Brosch-Lenz; Astrid Delker; Guido Böning; Bogdana Suchorska; Maximilian Niyazi; Christian H Wetzel; Markus J Riemenschneider; Sophia Stöcklein; Matthias Brendel; Rainer Rupprecht; Niklas Thon; Louisa von Baumgarten; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Sibylle Ziegler; Nathalie L Albert Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Antoine Girard; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Alice Metais; Beatrice Carsin Nicol; Dan Cristian Chiforeanu; Elise Bannier; Boris Campillo-Gimenez; Anne Devillers; Xavier Palard-Novello; Florence Le Jeune Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Cristina Barca; Claudia Foray; Bastian Zinnhardt; Alexandra Winkeler; Ulrich Herrlinger; Oliver M Grauer; Andreas H Jacobs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Maximilian Niyazi; Anca L Grosu; Martin Kocher; Karl-Josef Langen; Ian Law; Giuseppe Minniti; Michelle M Kim; Christina Tsien; Frederic Dhermain; Riccardo Soffietti; Minesh P Mehta; Michael Weller; Jörg-Christian Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Wynton B Overcast; Korbin M Davis; Chang Y Ho; Gary D Hutchins; Mark A Green; Brian D Graner; Michael C Veronesi Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 5.075