Literature DB >> 30327501

Breast cancer global tumor biomarkers: a quality assurance study of intratumoral heterogeneity.

Beth Z Clark1, Agnieszka Onisko2, Binara Assylbekova3, Xin Li3, Rohit Bhargava2, David J Dabbs2.   

Abstract

Biomarker analysis of invasive breast carcinoma is useful for prognosis, as surrogate for molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and prediction of response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Breast cancer intratumoral heterogeneity is incompletely studied. Comprehensive biomarker analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 labeling index was performed on each tissue block of 100 entirely submitted breast tumors in 99 patients. Invasive carcinoma and in situ carcinoma was scored using semiquantitative histologic score (H-score) for ER and PR, HER2 expression from 0 to 3+, and percentage positive cells for Ki67. Core biopsy results were compared with surgical excision results, invasive carcinoma was compared with in situ carcinoma, and interblock tumoral heterogeneity was assessed using measures of dispersion (coefficient of variation and quartile coefficient of dispersion). Overall concordance between core biopsy and surgical excision was 99% for ER and 95% for PR. Mean histologic score of ER was significantly lower in invasive carcinoma between core biopsy and surgical excision (p = 0.000796). Intratumoral heterogeneity was higher for PR than for ER (mean coefficient of variation for ER 0.08 stdv 0.13 vs. PR 0.26 stdv 0.41). Ki67 labeling index was significantly higher in invasive carcinoma as compared with associated ductal carcinoma in situ on surgical resection specimen (p ≤ 0.0001). Ki67 hotspots were identified in 47% of cases. Of 52 HER2 negative cases on core biopsy, 10 were scored as equivocal on surgical resection. None (0/10) were amplified by Her-2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization. Overall, biomarkers on core biopsy showed concordance with the surgical excision specimen in the vast majority of cases. Biomarker expression of in situ closely approximates associated invasive carcinoma. Intratumoral heterogeneity of PR is greater than ER. Biomarker expression on diagnostic core biopsy or single tumor block is representative of breast carcinoma as a whole in most cases and is appropriate for clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30327501     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0153-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  7 in total

1.  Morphological intratumor heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Claudia Stanciu-Pop; Marie-Cécile Nollevaux; Martine Berlière; Francois P Duhoux; Latifa Fellah; Christine Galant; Mieke R Van Bockstal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Changing patterns and survival improvements of young breast cancer in China and SEER database, 1999-2017.

Authors:  Rong Guo; Jing Si; Jingyan Xue; Yonghui Su; Miao Mo; Benlong Yang; Qi Zhang; Weiru Chi; Yayun Chi; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of second-harmonic generation scattering from tumor collagen and its effects on metastatic risk prediction.

Authors:  Danielle E Desa; Robert L Strawderman; Wencheng Wu; Robert L Hill; Marcel Smid; J W M Martens; Bradley M Turner; Edward B Brown
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Association of Preoperative Serum Levels of CEA and CA15-3 with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhao; Xiaoyan Li; Wenqing Wang; Bing Chen; Lijuan Wang; Ning Zhang; Zhe Wang; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Correlation of breast cancer microcirculation construction with tumor stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Guofu Huang; Siyi Li; Miaomiao Yao; Jianbing Ding; Fucheng Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematically higher Ki67 scores on core biopsy samples compared to corresponding resection specimen in breast cancer: a multi-operator and multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Balazs Acs; Samuel C Y Leung; Kelley M Kidwell; Indu Arun; Renaldas Augulis; Sunil S Badve; Yalai Bai; Anita L Bane; John M S Bartlett; Jane Bayani; Gilbert Bigras; Annika Blank; Henk Buikema; Martin C Chang; Robin L Dietz; Andrew Dodson; Susan Fineberg; Cornelia M Focke; Dongxia Gao; Allen M Gown; Carolina Gutierrez; Johan Hartman; Zuzana Kos; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Arvydas Laurinavicius; Richard M Levenson; Rustin Mahboubi-Ardakani; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; C Kent Osborne; Frédérique M Penault-Llorca; Tammy Piper; Mary Anne Quintayo; Tilman T Rau; Stefan Reinhard; Stephanie Robertson; Roberto Salgado; Tomoharu Sugie; Bert van der Vegt; Giuseppe Viale; Lila A Zabaglo; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; Torsten O Nielsen; David L Rimm
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.209

Review 7.  Understanding breast cancer heterogeneity through non-genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Neda Barzgar Barough; Fakhrosadat Sajjadian; Nazila Jalilzadeh; Hajar Shafaei; Kobra Velaei
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.239

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.