| Literature DB >> 30326845 |
Anne Richter1,2, Theresa Hölscher2, Patrick Pausch3, Tim Sehrt2, Franziska Brockhaus2, Gert Bange3, Ákos T Kovács4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selection for a certain trait in microbes depends on the genetic background of the strain and the selection pressure of the environmental conditions acting on the cells. In contrast to the sessile state in the biofilm, various bacterial cells employ flagellum-dependent motility under planktonic conditions suggesting that the two phenotypes are mutually exclusive. However, flagellum dependent motility facilitates the prompt establishment of floating biofilms on the air-medium interface, called pellicles. Previously, pellicles of B. subtilis were shown to be preferably established by motile cells, causing a reduced fitness of non-motile derivatives in the presence of the wild type strain.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; Biofilm; Pellicle; SinR; Wrinkly colony
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30326845 PMCID: PMC6192195 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1266-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1WS morphotypes exhibit elevated wrinkle formation and appear especially in non-motile mutant. a Microscopy images of WS morphotypes isolated from WT and Δhag strains grown on LB medium. Representative images for the phenotype of each detected mutation, indicated in parentheses, are displayed. The scale bar represents 2 mm. b Relative frequency of WS morphotypes in the pellicle biofilms of various B. subtilis derivatives grown on MSgg medium. Y-axis shows the frequency of WS colony types (1 equals to 100% of the colonies being wrinkly). Boxes represent quartile 1–3, the line represents the median and whiskers indicate the upper and lower inner fence and dots represent outliers. Asterisks indicate significant differences (two sample Student’s t test assuming unequal variances: P values: Δhag, 8.27∙10− 6; ΔflgE, 0.013; ΔfliF, 1.23∙10− 7; ΔsigD, 2.21∙10− 5, ΔmotA, 0.0125; n ≥ 9). Raw data available in Additional file 1: Supplementary Dataset 1. c Schematic representation of the SinR protein with domains and location of the detected mutations depicted
Fig. 2Increased matrix gene expression of WS morphotypes. a Representative confocal microscopy images of strains with P-yfp reporter (false colored green) indicating matrix gene expression. Wild type, Δhag and ΔsinR were compared to representative WS morphotypes of each wild type and Δhag background harboring the mutations V26G (WTWS9 and ΔhagWS9) and L99S (WTWS1 and ΔhagWS2). The scale bar represents 10 μm. b OD normalized expression of P-yfp of strains from (a) over time. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Raw data available in Additional file 1: Supplementary Dataset 1
Fig. 3SinR-L99S differs in its interaction with SinI and DNA. a ITC measurments of the interaction between the SinI peptide and SinR (left thermogram) and SinR-L99S (right thermogram). Derived thermodynamic parameters are shown on the right site. b ITC complex dissociation experiments of SinR (left thermogram) and SinR-L99S (right thermogram). c Cartoon representation of the B. subtilis SinR/SinI complex crystal structure (PDB-ID: 1B0N; Newman et al. 2013). SinR is colored in grey and SinI is colored in yellow. Leucine 99 (cyan) and the sourrunding SinR/SinI interface region is shown in stick representation. N and C indicate N-termini and C-termini, respectively. d ITC measurments of the interaction between the inverted repeat DNA and SinR (left thermogram) and SinR-L99S (right thermogram). Derived thermodynamic parameters are shown on the right site
Fig. 4WS morphotypes outcompete ancestor in Δhag but not wild type background. a Microscopy images of competitions between green (GFP) and red (mKATE) fluorescently labelled wild type (left) or hag mutant (right) and derived WS morphotypes (SinRL99S). False colored images of wells of a 24-well plate (diameter: 16 mm) are displayed. Control competitions with swapped fluorescent reporters (2nd row) and between otherwise identical strains (3rd and 4th row) were performed for each. b Semi-quantitative analysis of relative signal abundance for competitions of ancestor and WS morphotype from (a) (two sample Student’s t test assuming unequal variances: WTGFP + WTWSmKATE P = 0.005; WTWSGFP + WTmKATE P = 0.134; ΔhagGFP + ΔhagWSmKATE P = 2.8∙10− 4; ΔhagWSGFP + ΔhagmKATE P = 0.0027; n = 4). Error bars represent the standard deviation. Raw data available in Additional file 1: Supplementary Dataset 1