Literature DB >> 30326839

Correction to: multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.

Ines Rombach1,2, Alastair M Gray3, Crispin Jenkinson4, David W Murray5, Oliver Rivero-Arias6.   

Abstract

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that the following notation wasn't used consistently.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326839      PMCID: PMC6192362          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0563-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


Correction

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that the following notation wasn’t used consistently. The original article has been corrected. The correct notation is as follows: Unit-nonresponse Item-nonresponse
  1 in total

1.  Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.

Authors:  Ines Rombach; Alastair M Gray; Crispin Jenkinson; David W Murray; Oliver Rivero-Arias
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Prabin Dahal; Kasia Stepniewska; Philippe J Guerin; Umberto D'Alessandro; Ric N Price; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.