Literature DB >> 30326780

Accuracy of the wearable activity tracker Garmin Forerunner 235 for the assessment of heart rate during rest and activity.

Morten Pallisgaard Støve1, Emil Haucke1, Maria Lysbeck Nymann1, Tordur Sigurdsson1, Birgit Tine Larsen1.   

Abstract

Accurate measures of heart rate (HR) during rehabilitation and sporting activities are important for precise exercise prescription to maintain or increase capacity. Wrist-worn activity monitors utilizing photoplethysmography technology (PPG) to configure HR show discrepant findings regarding validity depending on the type and intensity of exercises measured, and no previous study has yet investigated the accuracy during running at speeds exceeding 9.6 km/h. The purpose of the study was to assess the accuracy of the Garmin Forerunner 235 (GF), at different exercises at various intensities. Twenty-nine participants participated in the study. HR was measured with the (GF) during rest and three submaximal exercise conditions; cycling, treadmill walking, running and rapid arm movements. The GF had high agreement with the PL during rest (r = 0.997) cycling at 150 W (Rho = 0.889), treadmill running at 8.7 km/h (r = 0.906) and 12.1 km/h (r = 0.845) and rapid arm movements (r = 0.928, r = 0.745) but a low agreement during cycling at 50 W (Rho = 0.269) and 100W (Rho = 0.462) and treadmill walking at 4.8 km/h (r = 0.481). The results varied across exercise conditions and intensities and although the GF provided accurate measurements of HR during rest, cycling at 150W, treadmill running, and rapid arm movement measurement latency may potentially affect application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity monitors; exercise; heart rate monitoring; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326780     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1535563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  11 in total

1.  Estimation of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure Using a Smart Bracelet during Different Exercise Intensities: A Reliability and Validity Study.

Authors:  Yihui Cai; Zi Wang; Wanxia Zhang; Weiya Kong; Jiayao Jiang; Ruobing Zhao; Dongxue Wang; Leyi Feng; Guoxin Ni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

Authors:  Jan M Mühlen; Julie Stang; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina-Garcia; William Johnston; Luís B Sardinha; Francisco B Ortega; Brian Caulfield; Wilhelm Bloch; Sulin Cheng; Ulf Ekelund; Jan Christian Brønd; Anders Grøntved; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Wearable activity trackers-advanced technology or advanced marketing?

Authors:  Ren-Jay Shei; Ian G Holder; Alicia S Oumsang; Brittni A Paris; Hunter L Paris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  In-Ear Pulse Rate Measurement: A Valid Alternative to Heart Rate Derived from Electrocardiography?

Authors:  Stefanie Passler; Niklas Müller; Veit Senner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Evaluation of COVID-19 Restrictions on Distance Runners' Training Habits Using Wearable Trackers.

Authors:  Zoe Y S Chan; Rhys Peeters; Gladys Cheing; Reed Ferber; Roy T H Cheung
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  Cardiodiagnostics Based on Photoplethysmographic Signals.

Authors:  Galya Georgieva-Tsaneva; Evgeniya Gospodinova; Krasimir Cheshmedzhiev
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-05

7.  Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography Assessment of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: Validation of WHOOP.

Authors:  Clint R Bellenger; Dean J Miller; Shona L Halson; Gregory D Roach; Charli Sargent
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities.

Authors:  Tricia Shumate; Magdalen Link; James Furness; Kevin Kemp-Smith; Vini Simas; Mike Climstein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Federico Germini; Noella Noronha; Victoria Borg Debono; Binu Abraham Philip; Drashti Pete; Tamara Navarro; Arun Keepanasseril; Sameer Parpia; Kerstin de Wit; Alfonso Iorio
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.