Ingrid van de Port1, Michiel Punt2, Jan Willem Meijer1. 1. Revant Rehabilitation Centres, Breda, The Netherlands. 2. Research Group Lifestyle and Health, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: Free-living walking activity and its contributing factors in ambulatory people with stroke is poorly investigated.Objective: Evaluating free-living walking activity and identifying factors associated with free-living walking activity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants wore an accelerometer to measure their level of walking activity. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go test for functional balance, the Falls Efficacy Scale, the 10-Metre Walk Test and the Geriatric Depression Scale to investigate the relation between the performance tests and walking activity. Results: The 38 analyzed participants were on average 62 (±11.4) years old and 66 (IQR 64.8) months post stroke. They took an average of 3048.3 ± 1983.1 steps, had 123.3 ± 61.3 walking bouts a day and walked for 32.5 ± 18.2 min a day. Their average speed was 90.3 ± 13.8 steps a minute. The multivariate linear analysis showed that the BBS was the only determinant that was significantly related to all outcomes, except walking bouts. Conclusion: Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low. The BBS is an independent significant predictor of free-living walking activity.Implications for rehabilitationFree-living walking activity can be expressed in different outcomes measured by accelerometry.Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low, therefore support to sustain walking in the own environment should be part of the rehabilitation program after stroke.Balance is an important related factor to free-living walking activity which needs attention during rehabilitation after stroke.
Background: Free-living walking activity and its contributing factors in ambulatory people with stroke is poorly investigated.Objective: Evaluating free-living walking activity and identifying factors associated with free-living walking activity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants wore an accelerometer to measure their level of walking activity. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go test for functional balance, the Falls Efficacy Scale, the 10-Metre Walk Test and the Geriatric Depression Scale to investigate the relation between the performance tests and walking activity. Results: The 38 analyzed participants were on average 62 (±11.4) years old and 66 (IQR 64.8) months post stroke. They took an average of 3048.3 ± 1983.1 steps, had 123.3 ± 61.3 walking bouts a day and walked for 32.5 ± 18.2 min a day. Their average speed was 90.3 ± 13.8 steps a minute. The multivariate linear analysis showed that the BBS was the only determinant that was significantly related to all outcomes, except walking bouts. Conclusion: Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low. The BBS is an independent significant predictor of free-living walking activity.Implications for rehabilitationFree-living walking activity can be expressed in different outcomes measured by accelerometry.Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low, therefore support to sustain walking in the own environment should be part of the rehabilitation program after stroke.Balance is an important related factor to free-living walking activity which needs attention during rehabilitation after stroke.
Authors: Ilona J M de Rooij; Ingrid G L van de Port; Michiel Punt; Pim J M Abbink-van Moorsel; Michiel Kortsmit; Ruben P A van Eijk; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Jan-Willem G Meijer Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2021-05-04
Authors: Christopher Buckley; M Encarna Micó-Amigo; Michael Dunne-Willows; Alan Godfrey; Aodhán Hickey; Sue Lord; Lynn Rochester; Silvia Del Din; Sarah A Moore Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Sofi A Andersson; Anna Danielsson; Fredrik Ohlsson; Jan Wipenmyr; Margit Alt Murphy Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 2.912