Literature DB >> 30326287

Combining transcriptomes and ultraconserved elements to illuminate the phylogeny of Apidae.

Silas Bossert1, Elizabeth A Murray2, Eduardo A B Almeida3, Seán G Brady4, Bonnie B Blaimer5, Bryan N Danforth2.   

Abstract

Two increasingly popular approaches to reconstruct the Tree of Life involve whole transcriptome sequencing and the target capture of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). Both methods can be used to generate large, multigene datasets for analysis of phylogenetic relationships in non-model organisms. While targeted exon sequencing across divergent lineages is now a standard method, it is still not clear if UCE data can be readily combined with published transcriptomes. In this study, we evaluate the combination of UCEs and transcriptomes in a single analysis using genome-, transcriptome-, and UCE data for 79 bees in the largest and most biologically diverse bee family, Apidae. Using existing tools, we first developed a workflow to assemble phylogenomic data from different sources and produced two large nucleotide matrices of combined data. We then reconstructed the phylogeny of the Apidae using concatenation- and coalescent-based methods, and critically evaluated the resulting phylogenies in the context of previously published genetic, genomic, and morphological data sets. Our estimated phylogenetic trees are robustly supported and largely congruent with previous molecular hypotheses, from deep nodes to shallow species-level phylogenies. Moreover, the combined approach allows us to resolve controversial nodes of the apid Tree of Life, by clarifying the relationships among the genera of orchid bees (Euglossini) and the monophyly of the Centridini. Additionally, we present novel phylogenetic evidence supporting the monophyly of the diverse clade of cleptoparasitic Apidae and the placement of two enigmatic, oil-collecting genera (Ctenoplectra and Tetrapedia). Lastly, we propose a revised classification of the family Apidae that reflects our improved understanding of apid higher-level relationships.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apidae; Cleptoparasitism; Genomes; Phylogenomics; Transcriptomes; UCEs; Ultraconserved elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326287     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  17 in total

Review 1.  Under the radar: detection avoidance in brood parasitic bees.

Authors:  Jessica R Litman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Rate variation in the evolution of non-coding DNA associated with social evolution in bees.

Authors:  Benjamin E R Rubin; Beryl M Jones; Brendan G Hunt; Sarah D Kocher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The gut microbiota of bumblebees.

Authors:  Tobin J Hammer; Eli Le; Alexia N Martin; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Insectes Soc       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.643

Review 4.  Applications and evolution of melittin, the quintessential membrane active peptide.

Authors:  Shantanu Guha; Ryan P Ferrie; Jenisha Ghimire; Cristina R Ventura; Eric Wu; Leisheng Sun; Sarah Y Kim; Gregory R Wiedman; Kalina Hristova; Wimley C Wimley
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 6.100

5.  Harrison's rule corroborated for the body size of cleptoparasitic cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae) and their hosts.

Authors:  Kayun Lim; Seunghyun Lee; Michael Orr; Seunghwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Do Viruses From Managed Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Endanger Wild Bees in Native Prairies?

Authors:  Zoe A Pritchard; Harmen P Hendriksma; Ashley L St Clair; David S Stein; Adam G Dolezal; Matthew E O'Neal; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.377

7.  Morphometric analysis of fossil bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini) reveals their taxonomic affinities.

Authors:  Manuel Dehon; Michael S Engel; Maxence Gérard; A Murat Aytekin; Guillaume Ghisbain; Paul H Williams; Pierre Rasmont; Denis Michez
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Gene expression during larval caste determination and differentiation in intermediately eusocial bumblebees, and a comparative analysis with advanced eusocial honeybees.

Authors:  David H Collins; Anders Wirén; Marjorie Labédan; Michael Smith; David C Prince; Irina Mohorianu; Tamas Dalmay; Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Possible Epigenetic Origin of a Recurrent Gynandromorph Pattern in Megachile Wild Bees.

Authors:  Daniele Sommaggio; Giuseppe Fusco; Marco Uliana; Alessandro Minelli
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Taxon-specific or universal? Using target capture to study the evolutionary history of rapid radiations.

Authors:  Gil Yardeni; Juan Viruel; Margot Paris; Jaqueline Hess; Clara Groot Crego; Marylaure de La Harpe; Norma Rivera; Michael H J Barfuss; Walter Till; Valeria Guzmán-Jacob; Thorsten Krömer; Christian Lexer; Ovidiu Paun; Thibault Leroy
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 8.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.