Literature DB >> 30326271

Operant Learning Versus Energy Conservation Activity Pacing Treatments in a Sample of Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mélanie Racine1, Mark P Jensen2, Manfred Harth3, Patricia Morley-Forster4, Warren R Nielson5.   

Abstract

This study's aim was to assess the efficacy of 2 forms of activity pacing in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Treatment-related changes in activity management patterns were also examined. Patients with FMS (n = 178) were randomly assigned to an operant learning (OL; delayed [n = 36] or immediate [n = 54] groups) or an energy conservation (EC; delayed [n = 35] or immediate [n = 53] groups) treatment condition. Of these, 32 OL and 37 EC patients completed treatment. Forty-three patients were allocated to the delayed treatment condition (control group). Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine the effects of OL and EC treatments on primary (average pain and usual fatigue), secondary (pain and fatigue interference, physical and psychological function, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms), and tertiary (pain-related activity patterns) outcomes. Neither treatment was effective in reducing average pain or usual fatigue symptoms. Relative to EC, OL patients showed greater improvements in depressive symptoms, whereas nonsignificant trends (P values ranging between .05 and .06) were observed for pain interference, fatigue interference, and psychological function. Both treatments were associated with improvements in sleep quality and physical function, increases in pacing, and decreases in overdoing activity patterns. Reductions in activity avoidance were only found in OL. These findings suggest that OL may be more beneficial than EC and that it could potentially be viewed as an effective stand-alone activity pacing treatment for patients with FMS. Research to determine the extent to which these preliminary findings replicate is warranted. PERSPECTIVE: This article examines the efficacy of 2 forms of activity pacing in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. The results suggest the possibility that operant learning may be more beneficial than energy conservation and could potentially be viewed as an effective stand-alone activity pacing treatment for patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity pacing; fibromyalgia syndrome; pain intensity; physical function; psychological function

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326271     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  5 in total

1.  Survey of activity pacing across healthcare professionals informs a new activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue.

Authors:  Deborah Antcliff; Anne-Maree Keenan; Philip Keeley; Steve Woby; Linda McGowan
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2019-08-20

2.  Testing a newly developed activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Deborah Antcliff; Anne-Maree Keenan; Philip Keeley; Steve Woby; Linda McGowan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A mixed-methods systematic review of post-viral fatigue interventions: Are there lessons for long Covid?

Authors:  Sally Fowler-Davis; Katharine Platts; Michael Thelwell; Amie Woodward; Deborah Harrop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Body Reprogramming: Reframing the Fibromyalgia narrative and providing an integrative therapeutic model.

Authors:  Anthony Fitzdonald Davies; Patrick Hill; Daniel Fay; Annily Dee; Cosima Locher
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2020-11-03

5.  Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults.

Authors:  Amanda C de C Williams; Emma Fisher; Leslie Hearn; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.