Literature DB >> 30326146

Nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma identify patients with favourable outcome.

Linyuan Wang1, Peter F Rambau1,2, Linda E Kelemen3, Michael S Anglesio4, Samuel Leung5, Aline Talhouk5, Martin Köbel1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) generally has a good prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy can be spared in low-stage disease, but prognostic biomarkers are needed to refine the treatment threshold. Wnt/β-catenin signalling is commonly altered in EC. We examined immunohistochemical expression of nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 as prognostic biomarkers for EC; both are mediators of the Wnt pathway. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated two ovarian EC cohorts, discovery set (n = 183) and validation set (n = 174), with ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS) as the primary end-point. In univariable analysis, nuclear β-catenin expression was significantly associated with longer OCSS in the discovery set [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.16-0.74, P = 0.004] and the validation set (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.11-0.89, P = 0.006). Similar significant associations were observed with CDX2 expression in the discovery set (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.50, P < 0.001) and validation set (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.07-0.75, P = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, combined positivity of both markers was significantly associated with longer OCSS in the discovery set (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06-0.49, P < 0.001) and in the validation set (HR = 0.33 95% CI = 0.07-0.1.06, P = 0.047). In a stratified analysis for stage IC/II EC, combined positivity identified a subset of patients with a significantly longer OCSS in the discovery cohort but only a non-significant trend in the validation cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression individually or in combination are validated prognostic markers for ovarian EC. However, their full potential to stratify low risk patients at adjuvant threshold awaits further multimarker study.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990CTNNB1zzm321990; CDX2; immunohistochemistry; ovarian endometrioid carcinoma; prognosis; β-catenin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30326146     DOI: 10.1111/his.13772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic utility of the ovarian cancer secretome: a systematic investigation.

Authors:  Pradnya R Kamble; Apoorva Pawar; Ananya A Breed; Grishma Kasle; Bhakti R Pathak
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Detection and analysis of multiple biomarkers in ovarian cancer: clinical significance in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation.

Authors:  Rui Ji; Yong Li; Chenyun He; Xinghua Zhu; Aiqin He; Yunyan Lu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  A combination of the immunohistochemical markers CK7 and SATB2 is highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from colorectal and appendiceal metastases.

Authors:  Nicola S Meagher; Linyuan Wang; Peter F Rambau; Maria P Intermaggio; David G Huntsman; Lynne R Wilkens; Mona A El-Bahrawy; Roberta B Ness; Kunle Odunsi; Helen Steed; Esther Herpel; Michael S Anglesio; Bonnie Zhang; Neil Lambie; Anthony J Swerdlow; Jan Lubiński; Robert A Vierkant; Ellen L Goode; Usha Menon; Aleksandra Toloczko-Grabarek; Oleg Oszurek; Sanela Bilic; Aline Talhouk; Montserrat García-Closas; Qin Wang; Adeline Tan; Rhonda Farrell; Catherine J Kennedy; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Karin Sundfeldt; John L Etter; Janusz Menkiszak; Marc T Goodman; Paul Klonowski; Yee Leung; Stacey J Winham; Kirsten B Moysich; Sabine Behrens; Tomasz Kluz; Robert P Edwards; Jacek Gronwald; Francesmary Modugno; Brenda Y Hernandez; Christine Chow; Linda E Kelemen; Gary L Keeney; Michael E Carney; Yanina Natanzon; Gregory Robertson; Raghwa Sharma; Simon A Gayther; Jennifer Alsop; Hugh Luk; Chloe Karpinskyj; Ian Campbell; Peter Sinn; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Penny Coulson; Jenny Chang-Claude; Mitul Shah; Martin Widschwendter; Katrina Tang; Minouk J Schoemaker; Jennifer M Koziak; Linda S Cook; James D Brenton; Frances Daley; Björg Kristjansdottir; Constantina Mateoiu; Melissa C Larson; Paul R Harnett; Audrey Jung; Anna deFazio; Kylie L Gorringe; Paul D P Pharoah; Parham Minoo; Colin Stewart; Oliver F Bathe; Xianyong Gui; Paul Cohen; Susan J Ramus; Martin Köbel
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 8.209

4.  A COEUR cohort study of SATB2 expression and its prognostic value in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  Cécile Le Page; Martin Köbel; Liliane Meunier; Diane M Provencher; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Kurosh Rahimi
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2019-04-20

Review 5.  Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Santandrea; Simonetta Piana; Riccardo Valli; Magda Zanelli; Elisa Gasparini; Antonio De Leo; Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Andrea Palicelli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 6.  A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Shuangfeng Chen; Yuebo Li; Lili Qian; Sisi Deng; Luwen Liu; Weihua Xiao; Ying Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Eun Young Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.