Do Hyun Kim1, Won-Soo Yun2,3, Jin-Hyung Shim2,3, Keun-Ho Park2, Dami Choi3, Moon Il Park1, Se Hwan Hwang4, Sung Won Kim1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea. 3. Research Institute, T&R Biofab Co Ltd, Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bucheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
Importance: Studies have shown the controllability and porosity of polycaprolactone as well as the use of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing for nasal reconstruction in animal models. The utility of polycaprolactone with 3-D technology in nasal cartilaginous framework reconstruction in humans remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of 3-D printed, bioresorbable polycaprolactone nasal implants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter clinical trial comprised 20 patients with caudal septal deviations who underwent septoplasty, which used a 3-D printed polycaprolactone mesh, at 2 centers in South Korea. Patients were included if they were aged 18 to 74 years and had nasal septal deviations, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores greater than 20, and persistent nasal obstructions. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, but 2 patients were excluded before the operation. The study was conducted from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The change in total Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score between the preoperative examination and the week 12 postoperative examination was the primary outcome. Changes in bilateral nasal cavity minimum cross-sectional area and volume on acoustic rhinometry at weeks 4 and 12 after the operation as well as changes in the nasal cavity cross-sectional area at the osteomeatal unit and nasal septum angle in the paranasal sinus on computed tomography after week 12 were among the secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 20 patients included in the study, 4 (20%) were female, 16 (80%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 34.95 (11.96) years. The preoperative and week 12 postoperative results revealed significant changes in the minimal cross-sectional areas on acoustic rhinometry (0.41 [SD, 0.39] vs -0.11 [SD, 0.18]; difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.61), nasal septum angles on computed tomography (11.22 [SD, 6.57] vs 2.89 [SD, 3.12]; difference, 8.33; 95% CI, 5.08-11.58), and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores (73.50 [SD, 19.88] vs 3.75 [SD, 6.26]; difference, 69.75; 95% CI, 59.22-80.28). The surgeons' convenience level with the procedure was favorable (visual analog scale score [SD], 90.90 [9.45]), and so were the patients' symptom improvements and satisfaction after 12 weeks (visual analog scale score [SD], 88.30 [9.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-D printed, homogeneous, composite, microporous polycaprolactone nasal implant demonstrated proper mechanical support and thinness with excellent biocompatibility and surgical manipulability. Polycaprolactone may be a clinically biocompatible material for use in various craniofacial reconstructions in the future.
Importance: Studies have shown the controllability and porosity of polycaprolactone as well as the use of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing for nasal reconstruction in animal models. The utility of polycaprolactone with 3-D technology in nasal cartilaginous framework reconstruction in humans remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of 3-D printed, bioresorbable polycaprolactone nasal implants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter clinical trial comprised 20 patients with caudal septal deviations who underwent septoplasty, which used a 3-D printed polycaprolactone mesh, at 2 centers in South Korea. Patients were included if they were aged 18 to 74 years and had nasal septal deviations, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores greater than 20, and persistent nasal obstructions. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, but 2 patients were excluded before the operation. The study was conducted from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The change in total Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score between the preoperative examination and the week 12 postoperative examination was the primary outcome. Changes in bilateral nasal cavity minimum cross-sectional area and volume on acoustic rhinometry at weeks 4 and 12 after the operation as well as changes in the nasal cavity cross-sectional area at the osteomeatal unit and nasal septum angle in the paranasal sinus on computed tomography after week 12 were among the secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 20 patients included in the study, 4 (20%) were female, 16 (80%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 34.95 (11.96) years. The preoperative and week 12 postoperative results revealed significant changes in the minimal cross-sectional areas on acoustic rhinometry (0.41 [SD, 0.39] vs -0.11 [SD, 0.18]; difference, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.61), nasal septum angles on computed tomography (11.22 [SD, 6.57] vs 2.89 [SD, 3.12]; difference, 8.33; 95% CI, 5.08-11.58), and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores (73.50 [SD, 19.88] vs 3.75 [SD, 6.26]; difference, 69.75; 95% CI, 59.22-80.28). The surgeons' convenience level with the procedure was favorable (visual analog scale score [SD], 90.90 [9.45]), and so were the patients' symptom improvements and satisfaction after 12 weeks (visual analog scale score [SD], 88.30 [9.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-D printed, homogeneous, composite, microporous polycaprolactone nasal implant demonstrated proper mechanical support and thinness with excellent biocompatibility and surgical manipulability. Polycaprolactone may be a clinically biocompatible material for use in various craniofacial reconstructions in the future.
Authors: Warren L Grayson; Mirjam Fröhlich; Keith Yeager; Sarindr Bhumiratana; M Ete Chan; Christopher Cannizzaro; Leo Q Wan; X Sherry Liu; X Edward Guo; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Do Hyun Kim; Mi Hyun Lim; Se Hwan Hwang; Sung Won Kim; Jung Ho Jeun; Sun Hwa Park; WeonSun Lee; Sang Hi Park; Mi Yeon Kwon Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Ana Aiastui; Iago González-Fernández; Raquel Hernáez-Moya; Claudia Rodiño; Alba Delgado; Juan P Garces; Jacobo Paredes-Puente; Javier Aldazabal; Xabier Altuna; Ander Izeta Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Sarah Al-Maawi; Eva Dohle; Jing Lim; Paul Weigl; Swee Hin Teoh; Robert Sader; Shahram Ghanaati Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.923