Literature DB >> 30325678

Comparison of Ocular Surface Mucin Expression After Topical Ophthalmic Drug Administration in Dry Eye-Induced Mouse Model.

Inhee Moon1, Hyun Goo Kang1, Areum Yeo1, Hyemi Noh1, Hyeon Chang Kim1,2, Jong Suk Song3, Yong Woo Ji1,4, Hyung Keun Lee1,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the mucinogenic effect of dry eye (DE) treatment drugs currently in use, we compared the levels of mucin production and inflammatory cytokine expression on the ocular surfaces using a DE-induced mice model.
METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were separated into 6 groups: a control group, DE-induced mice with the vehicle and treated with cyclosporine A (CsA), rebamipide (Reb), diquafosol tetrasodium (DQS), or prednisolone (Pred). The mRNA expression of MUC 1, 4, 16, 5AC, and proinflammatory cytokines on the corneal epithelia were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Expression of each MUC was evaluated using flow cytometry and immunohistostaining. Conjunctival goblet cells were analyzed through periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining.
RESULTS: Desiccating stress significantly decreased both mRNA and protein levels of all MUCs in the cornea. CsA mainly enhanced MUC5AC, with an increase in PAS-positive cells, whereas DQS chiefly increased membrane-associated mucins (MM). However, Reb only minimally increased expression of MUC5AC and Pred only increased MUC4. MUC16 did not show any significant change in any group. On the contrary, the mRNA levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, -6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interferon (IFN)-γ were increased in the DE corneas of the control mice and were reduced by all treatments; in particular, IL-6 was significantly suppressed.
CONCLUSION: Topical DQS and CsA not only ameliorated ocular surface inflammation under desiccating stress but also upregulated both MM and secretory mucins (SM) and contributed to conjunctival goblet cell recovery, compared to Reb and Pred. Both anti-inflammatory and secretory factors should be considered simultaneously when measuring the treatment effect of DE drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MUC1; MUC16; MUC5AC; cyclosporine; diquafosol; dry eye

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30325678     DOI: 10.1089/jop.2018.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1080-7683            Impact factor:   2.671


  5 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic dry eye mouse models: powerful tools to study dry eye disease.

Authors:  Dan-Yi Qin; Li-Xiang Wang; Ying-Ping Deng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Assessment of mucin-related gene alterations following treatment with rebamipide ophthalmic suspension in Sjögren's syndrome-associated dry eyes.

Authors:  Jun Shoji; Noriko Inada; Akiko Tomioka; Satoru Yamagami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Efficacy of Artificial Tears Based on an Extract of Artemia salina Containing Dinucleotides in a Rabbit Dry Eye Model.

Authors:  Carlos Carpena-Torres; Jesus Pintor; Fernando Huete-Toral; Alba Martin-Gil; Candela Rodríguez-Pomar; Alejandro Martínez-Águila; Gonzalo Carracedo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Diquafosol ophthalmic solution enhances mucin expression via ERK activation in human conjunctival epithelial cells with hyperosmotic stress.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Lee; Soonwon Yang; Eun Jeong Cheon; Soojung Shin; Yong-Soo Byun; Hyun Seung Kim; So-Hyang Chung
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Comparison of Trehalose/Hyaluronic Acid (HA) vs. 0.001% Hydrocortisone/HA Eyedrops on Signs and Inflammatory Markers in a Desiccating Model of Dry Eye Disease (DED).

Authors:  Gloria Astolfi; Luca Lorenzini; Francesca Gobbo; Giuseppe Sarli; Piera Versura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.