| Literature DB >> 30325607 |
Lida Sharifi-Rad1,2, Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian1, Hossein Amirzargar1, Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the different urine flow patterns and active pelvic floor electromyography (EMG) during voiding in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) as well as presenting the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Urinary Bladder ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30325607 PMCID: PMC6442192 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Characteristics and urine flow patterns of all patients.
| Patient n. (%) | Urine flow patterns | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Normal (%) | Staccato (%) | Interrupted (%) | Plateau (%) | Tower (%) | |
| Age (yr), mean ± SD (range) | 7.1± 2 (5-11) | 6.8±1.8 (5-11) | 7.3 ± 2.1 (5-11) | 7.6±2 (5-11) | 6.6±2 (5-11) | 6.4 ± 1.7 (5-10) |
| Female (%) | 175 | 54 (30.8%) | 62 (35.4%) | 34(19.4%) | 14 (8%) | 11(6.2%) |
| Male (%) | 50 | 16 (32.6%) | 14 (28.5%) | 7 (14.2%) | 12 (24.4%) | 1(2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bilateral VUR | 102 | 28 (27.4%) | 38 (37.2%) | 20 (19.6%) | 12 (11.7%) | 4 (3.9%) |
| Unilateral VUR | 128 | 43 (33.5%) | 40 (31.2%) | 22 (17.1%) | 15 (11.7%) | 8(6.2%) |
| EMG | 113 | 0 (0%) | 69 (61%) | 23 (20.3%) | 15 (13.2%) | 6(5.3%) |
= vesicoureteral reflux;
= electromyography
Comparison of uroflowmetry measures and post-void residual volume between patients with normal and abnormal urine flow patterns.
| Urine flow pattern | voided volume (mL) | Maximum urine flow rate (mL/sec) | Average urine flow rate (mL/sec) | Voiding time (s) | Residual volume (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell shape | 190±113 | 20.6 ± 7.6 | 10.9 ± 4.2 | 23.5 ± 14 | 17.3 ± 5 |
| Staccato | 194±117 | 20.1 ± 10.3 | 8.4 ± 4.1 | 21.7 ± 9.3 | 29.8 ± 24.8 |
| P | 0.581 | 0.839 | 0.054 | 0.623 | 0.167 |
| Bell shape | 190±113 | 20.6 ± 7.6 | 10.9 ± 4.2 | 23.5 ± 14 | 17.3 ± 5 |
| Interrupted | 265 ± 87 | 15.1 ± 6.4 | 8.3 ± 4.4 | 27.7 ± 18.6 | 45 ± 44 |
| P | 0.540 | 0.014 | 0.082 | 0.455 | 0.332 |
| Bell shape | 190±113 | 20.6 ± 7.6 | 10.9 ± 4.2 | 23.5 ± 14 | 17.3 ± 5 |
| Plateau | 209 ± 74 | 12.4 ± 5.3 | 6.5 ± 3.6 | 28.6 ± 14.3 | 30.8 ± 13.6 |
| P | 0.351 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.450 | 0.299 |
| Bell shape | 190±113 | 20.6 ± 7.6 | 10.9 ± 4.2 | 23.5 ± 14 | 17.3 ± 5 |
| Tower | 133 ± 51 | 34.9 ± 6.6 | 14.6 ± 5.3 | 16.9 ± 6.4 | 9.2 ± 4 |
| P | 0.053 | 0.034 | 0.014 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
Mean±SD;
Student t test
Lower urinary tract symptoms in different flow groups of patients.
| Patient n. (%) | Urine flow patterns | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Bell shape | Staccato | Interrupted | Plateau | Tower | |
| Urinary tract infection n.% | 201 | 67(34.8%) | 72(35.8%) | 32(16.6%) | 21(10.9%) | 9(4.4%) |
| Constipation n.% | 56 | 20(35.7%) | 18 (32.1%) | 9(16%) | 5(8.9%) | 4(7.1%) |
| Daytime incontinence n.% | 35 | 2(5.7%) | 19(54.2%) | 6(17.1%) | 3(8.5%) | 5(14.2%) |
| Nocturnal enuresis n.% | 66 | 19(28.7%) | 25(37.8%) | 9(13.6%) | 7(10.6%) | 6(9%) |
| Urgency n.% | 34 | 3(6.8 %) | 12(35.2%) | 4(11.7%) | 3(6.8%) | 12(35.2%) |
| Holding maneuver n.% | 56 | 2(3.5%) | 29(51.7%) | 19(21.4%) | 6(10.7%) | 0 |
Grade of VUR in different urine flow patterns.
| VUR grade I (unit) | VUR grade II (unit) | VUR grade III (unit) | VUR grade IV (unit) | VUR grade V (unit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell shape | 4 | 35 | 52 | 10 | 1 |
| Staccato | 5 | 49 | 46 | 17 | 3 |
| Interrupted | 4 | 21 | 27 | 6 | 3 |
| Plateau | 0 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 0 |
| Tower | 0 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 2 |