Literature DB >> 30325605

Removal of intramural trapped intrauterine device by cystoscopic incision of bladder wall.

Abbas Basiri1, Behnam Shakiba1, Niloufar Rostaminejad1.   

Abstract

A healthy 37 - year - old woman referred to our clinic with one - year history of recurrent urinary tract infection, dysuria and frequency. Her past medical history informed us that an IUD (Copper TCu380A) had been inserted 11 years ago. Eleven months after the IUD insertion she had become pregnant, unexpectedly. At that time, she had undergone gynecological examination and abdominal ultrasound study. However, the IUD had not been found, and the gynecologist had made the diagnosis of spontaneous fall out of the IUD. She had experienced normal pregnancy and caesarian section with no complications. On physical examination, pelvic examination was normal and no other abnormalities were noted. Urinalysis revealed microhematuria and pyuria. Urine culture was positive for Escherichia coli. Ultrasound study revealed a calculus of about 10 mm in the bladder with a hyperdense lesion. A plain abdominal radiograph was requested which showed a metallic foreign body in the pelvis. We failed to remove the IUD by cystoscopic forceps because it had strongly invaded into the uterine and bladder wall. Despite previous papers suggesting open or laparoscopic surgeries in this situation (1, 2), we performed a modified cystoscopic extraction technique. We made a superficial cut in the bladder mucosa and muscle with J - hook monopolar electrocautery and extracted it completely with gentle traction. This technique can decrease the indication of open or laparoscopic surgery for extraction of intravesical IUDs. In the other side of the coin, this technique may increase the risk of uterovesical fistula. Therefore, the depth of incision is important and the surgeon should cut the bladder wall superficially with caution. Although present study is a case report which is normally classified as with low level of evidence, it seems that our modified cystoscopic extraction technique is a safe and useful method for extraction of partially intravesical IUDs. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30325605      PMCID: PMC6541123          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


ARTICLE INFO

Available at: Int Braz J Urol. 2019; 45 (video #6): 408-9
  2 in total

1.  Intravesical migration of intrauterine device mimicking bladder stone on radiologic imaging: a case report.

Authors:  Sedat Yahsi; Binhan Kagan Aktas; Guven Erbay; Remzi Salar; Cevdet Serkan Gokkaya
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

Authors:  Dong Gil Shin; Tae Nam Kim; Wan Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Gross Hematuria Caused by Intravesical Migration of a Forgotten Intrauterine Device: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdulaziz Salih; Alemayehu Tegegne Tefera; Fitsum Gebreegziabher Gebrehiwot; Adugna Getachew Mideksa; Nebiyou Samuel Halala; Kaleab Habtemichael Gebreselassie
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.