Literature DB >> 30325503

Outpatient versus inpatient parotidectomy: Comparison of postoperative complication rates.

Sana H Siddiqui1, Roshansa Singh1, Emaad Siddiqui1, Eric H Zhao1, Jean Anderson Eloy1,2,3,4, Soly Baredes1,2, Richard Chan Woo Park1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Parotidectomies have become a common outpatient procedure, but their impact on postoperative complications as compared to inpatient procedures has not been evaluated in a multi-institutional study. STUDY
DESIGN: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the differences in outcomes using a standardized cohort of patients undergoing outpatient or inpatient parotidectomies.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for parotidectomies between 2005 and 2014. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare the outpatient and inpatient cohorts. A propensity-matching algorithm was used to ensure equal distribution of demographics and preoperative comorbidities.
RESULTS: Among the 4,368 parotidectomies examined, 2,915 (66.7%) were outpatient and 1,453 (33.3%) were inpatient. In the unmatched analysis, the inpatient group had higher rates of smokers (P = < 0.001), hypertension (P = 0.003), and disseminated cancer (P = 0.014). The outpatient group had higher rates of patients under age 40 years (P = 0.015), females (P = 0.016), and American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 and 2 (P = < 0.001). The total work relative value units (RVUs) were 17.01 ± 3.44 for the inpatient cohort and 16.19 ± 3.70 for the outpatient cohort (P = < 0.001). Following propensity matching, 1,352 cases were selected for each cohort, with no significant differences in comorbidities. Total work RVU after matching was 16.90 ± 3.47 for the inpatient group and 16.75 ± 3.44 for the outpatient group (P = .235). The matched inpatient cohort had increased rates of surgical complications (3.1% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.033), pneumonia (0.5% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.016), and overall complications (4.5% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: Outpatient parotidectomies are associated with similar as well as decreased complication rates as compared to inpatient parotidectomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:655-661, 2019.
© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Otolaryngology; database; outcomes; outpatient; parotidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30325503     DOI: 10.1002/lary.27358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Day case superficial parotidectomy-does it work?

Authors:  Mark Edmond; Elaine Campbell; Venkat Reddy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Outpatient versus inpatient superficial parotidectomy: clinical and pathological characteristics.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; David Forner; Christopher End; Christopher M K L Yao; Shireen Samargandy; Eric Monteiro; Ian J Witterick; Jeremy L Freeman
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 3.  Patient safety and quality improvements in parotid surgery.

Authors:  Vidit Talati; Hannah J Brown; Tasher Losenegger; Peter Revenaugh; Samer Al-Khudari
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.