Literature DB >> 30324809

Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with low back disorders. A systematic review of the literature.

Birgitta Wiitavaara1, Marina Heiden1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to investigate how physical function is assessed in people with musculoskeletal disorders in the low back. Specifically:Which questionnaires are used to assess physical function in people with musculoskeletal disorders in the low back?What aspects of physical function do those questionnaires measure?What are the measurement properties of the questionnaires?Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed to identify questionnaires and psychometric evaluations of them. The content of the questionnaires was categorised according to the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health, and the psychometric evaluations were categorised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.
Results: The questionnaires measured disability or ability to cope in everyday life, rather than physical function as such. Different aspects of a person's mobility and ability to attend to one's personal care were most often included regarding activity and participation. For body functions, items about sleep and pain were most often included. The Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale showed adequate psychometric properties in most evaluations.Conclusions: The extent of psychometric evaluations differed substantially, as did the items included. Focus of measurement was predominantly on activities in daily life.Implications for rehabilitationValid and reliable instruments that measure relevant aspects of low back disorders are needed to provide early diagnostics and effective treatment.Most questionnaires need more psychometric evaluations to establish the quality.The Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale showed adequate psychometric properties in most evaluations.The results may be useful when making decisions about which measurement instruments to use when evaluating low back disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICF; Questionnaire; low back; measure; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324809     DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1495274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  3 in total

1.  Physical functioning outcome measures in the lumbar spinal surgery population and measurement properties of the physical outcome measures: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Katie L Kowalski; Michael J Lukacs; Jai Mistry; Maren Goodman; Alison B Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Prognostic factors for the improvement of pain and disability following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Martin Weigl; Josefine Letzel; Felix Angst
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  What are important consequences in children with non-specific spinal pain? A qualitative study of Danish children aged 9-12 years.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Anna Bjellekjær Stolpe; Cornelius Myburgh; Lise Hestbæk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.