INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with splenic trauma undergo non-operative management (NOM); around 15% of these cases fail NOM and require surgery. The aim of the current study is to assess whether the hemodynamic status of the patient represents a risk factor for failure of NOM (fNOM) and if this may be considered a relevant factor in the decision-making process, especially in Centers where AE (angioembolization), intensive monitoring and 24-h-operating room are not available. Furthermore, the presence of additional risk factors for fNOM was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multicentre prospective observational study, including patients presenting with blunt splenic trauma older than 17 years, managed between 2014 and 2016 in two Italian trauma centres (ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII in Bergamo and Sant'Anna University Hospital in Ferrara-Italy). The risk factors for fNOM were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients were included in the study. In univariate analysis, the risk factors for fNOM were AAST grade > 3 (fNOM 37.5% vs 9.1%, p = 0.024), and the need of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the emergency department (ED) (fNOM 42.9% vs 8.9%, p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant risk factor for fNOM was the need for RBC transfusion in the ED (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirms the contraindication to NOM in case of hemodynamically instability in case of splenic trauma, as indicated by the most recent guidelines; attention should be paid to patients with transient hemodynamic stability, including patients who require transfusion of RBC in the ED. These patients could benefit from AE; in centers where AE, intensive monitoring and an 24-h-operating room are not available, this particular subgroup of patients should probably be treated with operative management.
INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with splenic trauma undergo non-operative management (NOM); around 15% of these cases fail NOM and require surgery. The aim of the current study is to assess whether the hemodynamic status of the patient represents a risk factor for failure of NOM (fNOM) and if this may be considered a relevant factor in the decision-making process, especially in Centers where AE (angioembolization), intensive monitoring and 24-h-operating room are not available. Furthermore, the presence of additional risk factors for fNOM was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multicentre prospective observational study, including patients presenting with blunt splenic trauma older than 17 years, managed between 2014 and 2016 in two Italian trauma centres (ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII in Bergamo and Sant'Anna University Hospital in Ferrara-Italy). The risk factors for fNOM were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients were included in the study. In univariate analysis, the risk factors for fNOM were AAST grade > 3 (fNOM 37.5% vs 9.1%, p = 0.024), and the need of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the emergency department (ED) (fNOM 42.9% vs 8.9%, p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant risk factor for fNOM was the need for RBC transfusion in the ED (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirms the contraindication to NOM in case of hemodynamically instability in case of splenic trauma, as indicated by the most recent guidelines; attention should be paid to patients with transient hemodynamic stability, including patients who require transfusion of RBC in the ED. These patients could benefit from AE; in centers where AE, intensive monitoring and an 24-h-operating room are not available, this particular subgroup of patients should probably be treated with operative management.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-operative management; Non-operative management failure; Spleen trauma; Trauma care
Authors: George C Velmahos; Nikos Zacharias; Timothy A Emhoff; James M Feeney; James M Hurst; Bruce A Crookes; David T Harrington; Shea C Gregg; Sheldon Brotman; Peter A Burke; Kimberly A Davis; Rajan Gupta; Robert J Winchell; Steven Desjardins; Reginald Alouidor; Ronald I Gross; Michael S Rosenblatt; John T Schulz; Yuchiao Chang Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2010-05
Authors: Susan E Rowell; Walter L Biffl; Karen Brasel; Ernest E Moore; Roxie A Albrecht; Marc DeMoya; Nicholas Namias; Martin A Schreiber; Mitchell J Cohen; David V Shatz; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Frederick A Moore Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: B G Harbrecht; A B Peitzman; L Rivera; B Heil; M Croce; J A Morris; B L Enderson; S Kurek; M Pasquale; E R Frykberg; J P Minei; J W Meredith; J Young; G P Kealey; S Ross; F A Luchette; M McCarthy; F Davis; D Shatz; G Tinkoff; E F Block; J B Cone; L M Jones; T Chalifoux; M B Federle; K D Clancy; J B Ochoa; S M Fakhry; R Townsend; R M Bell; L Weireter; M B Shapiro; F Rogers; C M Dunham; C E McAuley Journal: J Trauma Date: 2001-11
Authors: Gregory A Watson; Matthew R Rosengart; Mazen S Zenati; Allan Tsung; Raquel M Forsythe; Andrew B Peitzman; Brian G Harbrecht Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-11
Authors: Nicole A Stassen; Indermeet Bhullar; Julius D Cheng; Marie L Crandall; Randall S Friese; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Randeep S Jawa; Adrian A Maung; Thomas J Rohs; Ayodele Sangosanya; Kevin M Schuster; Mark J Seamon; Kathryn M Tchorz; Ben L Zarzuar; Andrew J Kerwin Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.313