Literature DB >> 30324081

Corynebacteria as a cause of pulmonary infection: a case series and literature review.

Katharine Yang1, Robert L Kruse1, Weijie V Lin1, Daniel M Musher1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), an etiologic agent is not determined; the most common report from the microbiological evaluation of sputum cites "normal respiratory flora." Non-diphtheria Corynebacterium spp., a component of this flora, is commonly viewed as a contaminant, but it may be the cause of pneumonia and the frequency with which it causes CAP may be underestimated. CASE PRESENTATIONS: This report present 3 cases of CAP in which Corynebacterium spp. was clearly the predominant isolate; identification was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Two cases were caused by C. propinquum and one by C. striatum. Two patients had a tracheostomy and one was on hemodialysis. Patients who received an appropriate antibiotic responded well.
CONCLUSION: When identified as the predominant isolate in sputum from a patient with CAP, Corynebacterium spp. should be considered as a potential cause of the infection. In cases with patients who have compromised airway clearance or who are immunocompromised, microaspiration may be responsible. While some Corynebacterium spp. are suspectible to antibiotics usually prescribed for CAP, others are susceptible only to vancomycin or aminoglycosides. Vancomycin is thus the appropriate empiric antibiotic, pending speciation and susceptibility test results. The number of reported cases with result of antibiotic susceptibility testing, however, remains limited, and further investigation is needed. Non-diphtheria Corynebacterium spp. represent a noteworthy clinical cause of pneumonia. Identification by Gram stain and as a predominant organism on culture demands careful consideration for management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corynebacteria; Diphtheroids; Normal respiratory flora; Pneumonia

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324081      PMCID: PMC6173903          DOI: 10.1186/s41479-018-0054-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pneumonia (Nathan)        ISSN: 2200-6133


Background

Pneumonia is an important cause of medical morbidity and mortality worldwide; pneumonia and influenza are listed as the 8th leading cause of death in the United States, with 57,062 deaths in 2015 [1]. Well-recognized and common causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults include bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus, and viruses such as influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and parainfluenza virus. Intensive recent investigations have failed to identify a causative organism in 50–62% of patients hospitalized for CAP [2, 3]. The most common laboratory report for sputum samples submitted for microbiological study is “mixed respiratory flora.” Pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae is thought to result from unrecognized microaspiration of pneumococci that have colonized the nasopharynx [4]. The authors of the present study have previously hypothesized that unrecognized aspiration of less virulent bacteria that normally inhabit the nasopharynx might also cause pneumonia, especially in persons whose upper airways are bypassed or whose ability to clear aspirated organisms is damaged [5]. The present study examined the possibilities that: (i) careful examination of Gram-stained sputum and culture plates may reveal a predominant bacterium such as Corynebacterium spp. that are not generally regarded as a pulmonary pathogen; (ii) quantitative cultures may document a high concentration of these bacteria in sputum; and (iii) these organisms are in fact the cause of some cases of pneumonia. Corynebacterium spp. Gram-positive bacilli that are often dismissed as contaminants have been reported to cause pneumonia (Table 1). New technologies, such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry enable rapid and precise identification of bacterial species [6], and highly sensitive techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can help exclude a role for viruses, mycoplasma, and chlamydia. With the advent of these new technologies, there has been greater interest in Corynebacteria, and these organisms have been cited as emerging pathogens [7].
Table 1

Previously documented cases of Corynebacterium pulmonary infection

Organism isolatedNo. of casesAge/SexCo-morbid conditionsDiagnosisMethods of DiagnosisMortality N (%)
C. accolens [46]172FDM, myocardial infarction, triple aortic bypass, heart failurePneumoniaBronchoalveolar brush sample. Culture also yielded small numbers of P. aeruginosa1 (100%)
C. afermentans [19]127FHIVEmpyemaPleural fluid and blood culture positive. Sputum culture reported “normal respiratory flora”0 (0%)
C. jeikeium [10, 22, 23, 47]548F, 28F, 29F, 76M, 77F 2 Acute myelogenous leukemia, 1 Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Acute myelomonocytic leukemia, 1 old pulmonary tuberculosis, and 1 COPDPneumonia, (necrosis and hemorrhage in 1 case)Positive gram stain and culture from 1 post-mortem pneumonia;4 positive respiratory cultures (including 1 TTA). In 1 case, sputum yielded 106 C. jeikeium, > 107 S. aureus and 103 P. aeruginosa per ml; TTA culture yielded > 108 C. jeikeium, 104 P. aeruginosa, and 103 S. aureus; FNA yielded pure growth of C. jeikeium4 (80%)
C. macginleyi [28]173FMetastatic lung adenocarcinoma, chemotherapy, intubated post-bronchoscopyVentilator-associated pneumoniaSputum culture had 105 CFU/mL C. macginleyi0 (0%)
C. mucifaciens [26]151MDMCavitary pneumoniaNot described0 (0%)
C. propinquum [14, 48]472F, 79M, 83M, 7F2 DM, 1 non-Hodgkin’s MALT lymphoma, 2 Rheumatoid arthritis, 2 COPD, 1 ataxia telangiectasia on inhaled corticosteroidsPneumonia3 sputum culture; 1 case with bronchial aspirate and broncho-alveolar lavage yielding only C. propinquum and blood culture positive for S. pneumoniae0 (0%)
C. pseudo-diphtheriticum [1214, 3338, 4955]4091F, 40M, 79F, 70 M, 71M, 68M, 72M, 70F, 74M, 76F, 83M, 75M, 68M, 76M, 65M, 68F, 64M, 67M, 62M, 66M, 50F, 27F, 68F, 29M, 47M, 41M, 24M, 43M, 34M, 33M, 33M, 43M, 34M, 29M, 30M, 80F, 9F, 59M, 46M, 75M2 CKD, 3 CHF, 10 COPD, 4 DM, 2 asthma, SLE, 1 Adult T-cell lymphotrophic virus Ab+, 1 tracheostomy, 2 lung cancers, 1 epidermoid carcinoma, 2 autoimmune disorder on steroid therapy, 2 intubations, 1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 10 HIV/AIDS, 3 previous tuberculosis, 2 recent Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, 1 cystic fibrosisPneumonia15 sputum Gram stains, 2 bronchial secretions, 1 bronchial wash; Cultures also yielded fewer numbers of other bacteria: S. aureus (2), H. influenzae (1), S. pneumoniae (3), S. maltophila (1), P. aeruginosa (1), E. cloacae (1)4 (10%);9 status unknown, 27 resolved
C. pseudotuberculosis [24, 25]223F, 28M2 veterinary students (1 known exposure to sick horses)PneumoniaTTA or CT guided transthoracic biopsy0 (0%)
C. striatum [1417, 5658]768F, 47F, 28M, 27M, 69M, 58M, 69F1 DM, 2 HIV/AIDS, 1 alcohol use, 1 COPD, 1 heart transplant, 1 RA on prednisone6 pneumonia, 1 empyema2 sputum, 2 BAL cultures (4 × 103 CFU/mL and > 105 CFU/mL), 1 bronchoscopy brush sample, 1 empyema, 1 pleural fluid +1 lung tissue culture1 (14%)
C. ulcerans [27, 59]278M, 80F1 Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, 1 HTNPneumonia2 positive sputum cultures, 1 confirmed by BAL2 (100%)
C. urealyticum [60]172MCHF, COPDPneumoniaTranstracheal aspirate0 (0%)
C. xerosis [20]163MAMLPneumoniaBAL culture yielded 105 C. xerosis /mL1 (100%)
“Aerobic diphtheroids” [61]168MHeavy smoking history, dental extractionsEmpyemaPleural fluid culture grew only “diphtheroids”0 (0%)

DM Diabetes Mellitus, HTN Hypertension, HLD Hyperlipidemia, HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus, CFU colony forming units, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, RML Right middle lobe of lung, TTA transtracheal aspiration, FNA Fine Needle Aspiration, cx culture, MALT Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, CKD Chronic kidney disease, CHF Congestive heart failure, SLE Systemic Lupus Erythematosis, AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, BAL bronchoaveolar lavage

Previously documented cases of Corynebacterium pulmonary infection DM Diabetes Mellitus, HTN Hypertension, HLD Hyperlipidemia, HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus, CFU colony forming units, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, RML Right middle lobe of lung, TTA transtracheal aspiration, FNA Fine Needle Aspiration, cx culture, MALT Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, CKD Chronic kidney disease, CHF Congestive heart failure, SLE Systemic Lupus Erythematosis, AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, BAL bronchoaveolar lavage The present study reports on 3 well-documented cases of CAP due to Corynebacteria (2 cases of C. propinquum, 1 case of C. striatum) that were diagnosed in a 6-month period at a large tertiary care hospital. The study reviews the medical literature on Corynebacterium spp. as etiologic agents of pneumonia, with the goal of increasing awareness of the possibility that so-called “normal respiratory flora” may actually be responsible for an as-yet undetermined proportion of cases of CAP.

Case presentations

Case 1

A 75-year-old man on hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease was hospitalized for cough, fever, and altered mental status. His temperature was 103 °F, pulse 68, blood pressure 124/69, respiratory rate 22, and O2 saturation 96% on 2 L of O2 by nasal cannula. He was lethargic, with bibasilar crackles and a normal cardiac examination. His white blood cell (WBC) count was 20,100 cells/mm3 and his plasma procalcitonin was 1.1 ng/mL. Chest X-ray showed bibasilar infiltrates. Microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum showed profuse polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and Gram-positive rods, many of which appeared to be intracellular (Fig. 1). Sputum culture yielded overwhelmingly predominant Corynebacteria, with rare P. aeruginosa. The Corynebacteria was identified as C. propinquum by MALDI-TOF. Blood cultures and viral PCR were negative. The patient was initially treated with vancomycin, cefepime, and metronidazole. Based on the predominance of Corynebacteria with the absence of other bacteria on Gram stain and a negative PCR for respiratory viruses, his pneumonia was attributed to C. propinquum, and only vancomycin was continued. He responded and was discharged to complete a 10-day course of linezolid.
Fig. 1

Gram-stain observed in sputum from patient with Corynebacterial pneumonia. A sputum sample collected from the patient in Case 1 depicts Gram-positive bacilli (purple) within and surrounding polymorphonuclear cells (pink). The “club-shaped” appearance pathognomonic for the group “Coryneform” is appreciated

Gram-stain observed in sputum from patient with Corynebacterial pneumonia. A sputum sample collected from the patient in Case 1 depicts Gram-positive bacilli (purple) within and surrounding polymorphonuclear cells (pink). The “club-shaped” appearance pathognomonic for the group “Coryneform” is appreciated

Case 2

A 61-year-old man was found unresponsive post laryngectomy and tracheostomy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. His temperature was 97.8 °F, pulse 99, blood pressure 114/86, and respiratory rate 22. Breath sounds were decreased bilaterally. WBC count was 7200 cells/mm3, lactate 1.2 mg/dL. Chest X-ray showed a new left-sided infiltrate. Sputum Gram stain revealed many Gram-positive rods, including those found within PMNs. Sputum yielded many Corynebacteria, identified by MALDI-TOF as C. propinquum, and few S. aureus. Sputum was liquefied with 2% N-acetyl cysteine and diluted serially; aliquots were cultured on blood agar and the number of colony forming units (CFU) was calculated [8]. The specimen contained 2 × 109 CFU of Corynebacteria and < 105 CFU of S. aureus per mL. Blood cultures and viral PCR were negative. The patient was initially given vancomycin, cefepime, and ampicillin; treatment was switched to ampicillin/sulbactam after the Corynebacterium was reported susceptible. His mental status rapidly improved, and he was subsequently discharged to complete a 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate.

Case 3

A 59-year-old male with widely metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue was admitted for bleeding from his tracheostomy site. His temperature was 99 °F, blood pressure 108/84, pulse 119, respiratory rate 24, and oxygen saturation 82% on room air. He had blood at the tracheostomy site and bibasilar rhonchi. WBC count was 22,000 cells/mm3, hemoglobin 11.1 g/dL, and lactate 1.8 mg/dL. Chest X-ray revealed a left upper-lobe infiltrate. Sputum sample showed profuse PMNs and Gram-positive rods. Culture yielded C. striatum (confirmed by MALDI-TOF) and few Escherichia coli. The patient was placed on comfort care and died 8 days later.

Discussion

Epidemiology

Non-diphtheria Corynebacterium spp.--commensal flora of the skin, respiratory tract, and mucous membranes [9, 10]-- have been characterized as emerging pathogens [7]. Among reported cases, infections of the respiratory tract are second in frequency only to those of the urinary tract [11]. The literature search revealed 67 reported cases of pulmonary infection due to non-diphtheria Corynebacterium spp., summarized in Table 1. Cases include pneumonia (community-acquired, hospital-acquired, or ventilator-associated), necrotizing pneumonia, and empyema, although pneumonia predominated. Implicated Corynebacterium spp. include C. pseudodiphtheriticum [12, 13], C. propinquum [14], C. striatum [14-18], C. afermentans [19], C. xerosis [20], C. jeikeium [10, 21–23], C. pseudotuberculosis [24, 25], C. mucifaciens [26], C. ulcerans [27], and C. macginleyi [28].

Microbiology, pathogenesis, and immunity

“Coryneform bacteria” is the umbrella term for the class of bacteria comprised of facultative intracellular, non-spore-forming, catalase-positive, non-acid-fast, non-motile, and irregularly-shaped Gram-positive rods [29]. Based on 16S rRNA sequencing studies, Corynebacterium belongs to a subdivision of Gram-positive eubacteria with high guanine-to-cytosine content, which also contains Arthrobacter, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, and Streptomyces [30]. Coryneform bacteria are pleomorphic throughout their life cycle, and may have thickenings at either end, giving the “coryneform” name, meaning “club-shaped”; they may be clustered, forming shapes that resemble a “V,” “palisades,” or “Chinese letters” [29]. Because of their relation to C. diphtheriae, their common name is “diphtheroids.” Little is known about the virulence factors of the non-diphtheria Corynebacterium spp. that may contribute to CAP and other infections [31]. C. pseudodiphtheriticum, the species most commonly implicated as a cause of pneumonia, has an ability to invade human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells and survive for 24 h after infection, suggesting a potential mechanism to escape killing by the innate immune system [31]. Invasive strains form biofilms and bind fibrinogen and fibronectin, which may be facilitated by fimbrial subunits [31, 32].

Predisposing conditions

With the exception of 2 cases of pneumonia due to C. pseudotuberculosis in veterinary workers [24, 25], all other reported cases of Corynebacterial pneumonia have occurred in persons whose upper airways are bypassed, whose ability to clear aspirated organisms is damaged, or who have immunocompromising conditions (Table 2). The great majority of patients have had conditions that affect pulmonary clearance, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis [33], and previous radiotherapy to the thorax [27]. Some have had procedures that bypass protective mechanisms of the upper airways such as recent endotracheal intubation [28, 34, 35] or laryngectomy [36], as seen in Cases 2 and 3 in the present study. Among patients who are immunocompromised, co-morbidities included HIV infection [17, 37, 38], chemotherapy [10, 28], hematologic malignancies or conditions that compromise PMN function such as diabetes mellitus, alcohol use disorder [16] or end-stage renal disease, as seen in Case 1 in the present study.
Table 2

Risk factors in reported cases of Corynebacterial pneumonia

Risk CategoryExamples
Decreased clearance / Damaged lung structureChronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePrevious radiation to thoraxCystic fibrosisHeavy smoking history
Bypass of airway protectionActive or recent endotracheal intubationLaryngectomy
ImmunodeficiencyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infectionOngoing or recent cancer chemotherapyConditions that compromise function of PMNs (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease)Steroid use secondary to autoimmune diseaseImmunosuppressive drug use secondary to transplant
Miscellaneous factorsAlcohol use disorder
EnvironmentalExposure to sick animals (C. pseudotuberculosis only)
Risk factors in reported cases of Corynebacterial pneumonia

Clinical description

The presentation of pneumonia due to Corynebacteria does not differ from that due to bacterial pneumonia of any other cause: cough, fever, and altered mental status are usually present, as observed in the present study’s 3 cases. Cases of community-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, cavitary pneumonia, empyema, and bacteremia have been described (Table 1). Only 5 (7.5%) of the 67 reported patients with Corynebacterial pneumonia have been bacteremic with Corynebacteria. This suggests that blood cultures may be of minimal utility for confirming any sputum findings. Pneumonia caused by the quintessential pulmonary pathogen, S. pneumoniae, is bacteremic in no more than approximately 25% of cases [39], and the rate of bacteremia is far lower in pneumonia due to less pathogenic organisms, such as nontypable H. influenzae [40] or Moraxella catarrhalis [41].

Laboratory diagnosis

Given the limited utility of blood cultures in diagnosing Corynebacterial pneumonia, diagnosis requires a multifaceted approach. In most previous case reports, diagnosis has been based on microscopic examination of a Gram-stained sputum and careful examination of culture plates [42]. In the 3 cases discussed in this report, the sputum Gram stain showed profuse numbers of Corynebacteria. In 12 of the previously reported cases, quantitative studies were carried out on sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage samples, or protected bronchial brush samples (Table 1) with few or no colonies of other potentially pathogenic bacteria, as in Case 2 in which quantitative sputum culture revealed 1.2 × 109 CFU/mL. Pneumonia due to Corynebacteria may occur far more commonly than has been reported, because the finding of these organisms is usually dismissed as “normal mouth flora” or “normal respiratory flora.” MALDI-TOF is useful in providing precise speciation, as was employed in the 3 cases discussed in this report. An analysis of 83 Corynebacterial samples compared MALDI-TOF with API Coryne V2.0 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), which is the method that has been most widely used to speciate Corynebacteria in the past few decades. Identification matched in 73 of 83 (88%) samples [43]. 16S rRNA sequencing was used to resolve the discrepancy in the remaining 10 samples. All 10 matched with MALDI-TOF’s identification, which demonstrates the superiority of this methodology [43, 44].

Management

Corynebacterium spp. that have been identified as causes of pneumonia or empyema are delineated in Table 1. C. pseudodiptheriticum, the cause of about two-thirds of reported Corynebacterial pneumonia cases, is susceptible to penicillin, cephalosporins, and vancomycin, but resistant to macrolides, clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, quinolones, and/or rifampin (Table 3). Some species, including C. jeikeium, C. macginleyi, and C. xerosis, are resistant to all common antibiotics except glycopeptides such as vancomycin (Table 3). Intermediately resistant organisms such as C. propinquum and C. striatum, implicated in the present study’s 3 cases, are also consistently susceptible to vancomycin and ampicillin, but variably susceptible to penicillin and cephalosporins, and commonly resistant to macrolides, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolines, and rifampin. The other reported Corynebacterium spp.—C. accolens, C. afermentans, C. mucifaciens, C. pseudotuberculosis, C. urealyticum, and C. ulcerans—had only 1–2 case reports each, and/or did not include comprehensive susceptibility reports. These cases are summarized in Table 3. Although only one pneumonia case report [17] included susceptibility to linezolid or tigecycline, a prospective study analyzing infections due to Corynebacteria from a variety of sites revealed that all isolates—the majority being C. amycolatum, C. accolens, C. minutissimum, and C. glucuronolyticum (strains that are not regularly implicated in pneumonia)—were susceptible to linezolid and tigecycline [45].
Table 3

Antibiotic susceptibilities of Corynebacterium spp. identified as causes of pulmonary infection

Antibiotic
Organism PCN AMX AMC AMP CEF CFZ CXM CRO CTX SXT ERY AZM CLI CIP
C. accolens (n = 1)100100100000
C. afermentans (n = 1)100
C. jeikeium (n = 5)000000
C. macginleyi (n = 1)0000000
C. mucifaciens (n = 1)100100100
C. propinquum (n = 1)1001001000
C. pseudodiphtheriticum (n = 24)100100100100100100100100100455873
C. pseudotuberculosis (n = 2)100100100100100
C. striatum (n = 7)601001001006700075050000
C. ulcerans (n = 2)5010010010010050100
C. urealyticum (n = 1)100100100
C. xerosis (n = 1)00000000
Organism LCM RIF GEN TOB VAN LZD IPM AMK DOX TET TEC CHL FOF DAP
C. accolens (n = 1)100001001000100
C. afermentans (n = 1)100100
C. jeikeium (n = 5)1005010010050
C. macginleyi (n = 1)100
C. mucifaciens (n = 1)100100
C. propinquum (n = 1)100100100
C. pseudodiphtheriticum (n = 24)0751001001001001001001008627
C. pseudotuberculosis (n = 2)100100100
C. striatum (n = 7)10060100100100100805050100
C. ulcerans (n = 2)100100100100100100
C. urealyticum (n = 1)100
C. xerosis (n = 1)01000

Antibiotic susceptibility for each Corynebacterium spp. as reported in all previous cases of Corynebacterial pneumonia (see Table 1 for reference listing) was calculated from number of sensitive isolates as a percentage of the total number of isolates tested with that antibiotic. Blank boxes represent a lack of testing information. The total number of isolates of each species is provided (n). Not all isolates under each organism were tested for the same antibiotics.

PCN penicillin, AMX amoxicillin, AMC amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMP ampicillin, CEF cefalothin, CFZ cefazolin, CXM cefuroxime, FOX cefoxitin, CRO ceftriaxone, CTX cefotaxime, OFX ofloxacin, SXT trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ERY erythromycin, AZM azithromycin, CLI clindamycin, LCM lincomycin, RIF rifampin, GEN gentamicin, TOB tobramycin, VAN vancomycin, LZD linezolid, IPM Imipenem, AMK amikacin, DOX doxycycline, TET tetracycline, TEC teicoplanin, CHL chloramphenicol, FOF Fosfomycin, DAP daptomycin

Antibiotic susceptibilities of Corynebacterium spp. identified as causes of pulmonary infection Antibiotic susceptibility for each Corynebacterium spp. as reported in all previous cases of Corynebacterial pneumonia (see Table 1 for reference listing) was calculated from number of sensitive isolates as a percentage of the total number of isolates tested with that antibiotic. Blank boxes represent a lack of testing information. The total number of isolates of each species is provided (n). Not all isolates under each organism were tested for the same antibiotics. PCN penicillin, AMX amoxicillin, AMC amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMP ampicillin, CEF cefalothin, CFZ cefazolin, CXM cefuroxime, FOX cefoxitin, CRO ceftriaxone, CTX cefotaxime, OFX ofloxacin, SXT trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ERY erythromycin, AZM azithromycin, CLI clindamycin, LCM lincomycin, RIF rifampin, GEN gentamicin, TOB tobramycin, VAN vancomycin, LZD linezolid, IPM Imipenem, AMK amikacin, DOX doxycycline, TET tetracycline, TEC teicoplanin, CHL chloramphenicol, FOF Fosfomycin, DAP daptomycin These results suggest that, when a Gram-stained sputum from a patient with pneumonia reveals Corynebacteria as the predominant isolate, vancomycin should be the initial antibiotic of choice. If MALDI-TOF identifies a species that is likely to be susceptible to other antibiotics, the empiric antibiotic of choice can be revised, or definitive antibiotic treatment can be given based on results of antibiotic susceptibility testing as determined by gradient diffusion strip testing. There is no accepted recommendation for length of treatment for Corynebacterial pneumonia. However, among case reports, treatment time has ranged from 10 days for a case of C. macginleyi pneumonia [28], to 8 weeks for a cavitating pneumonia due to C. jeikeium [22], to 14 months for pneumonia due to C. pseudotuberculosis [25]. It seems reasonable to select a duration of treatment based on the nature of the lung lesion. Infiltrates should respond to the same 7 days of treatment that are used for other bacterial pneumonias, whereas cavitating pneumonia should be treated for longer periods, perhaps until the cavity is closed. In some cases, inadequate responses have been observed in cases of a lung abscess or cavitation, prompting surgical resection [16, 37].

Conclusions

Although traditionally regarded as part of normal respiratory flora, Corynebacteria has the capacity to cause pneumonia in immunocompromised patients, or in immunocompetent patients who have impaired airway clearance and/or structural damage to the airways. The presentation is similar to that of any other bacterial pneumonia. Such infections may be far more common than has been previously suggested, because the finding of Corynebacteria on Gram stain and culture is likely to lead to a report of “mixed” or “normal respiratory flora.” A correct diagnosis can be made primarily by visualization of large numbers of diphtheroids in microscopic fields that contain > 20 WBC per epithelial cell, especially if the bacteria are located within PMNs, and supported by a culture in which the overwhelmingly predominant organism is Corynebacteria. Speciation by MALDI-TOF is increasingly available in clinical laboratories. Initial treatment should be with vancomycin. Speciation may guide antibiotic choice, but definitive therapy should be based on susceptibility testing using gradient diffusion strip testing methodology.
  57 in total

1.  [Pneumonia by Corynebacterium pseudodiphteriticum: an infection to consider].

Authors:  R Carranza González; D Tena Gómez; E Prieto Gómez; J R Barberá Farré; J Fernández Cenjor
Journal:  An Med Interna       Date:  2006-03

2.  Bronchopneumonia caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishiyama; Tadashi Ishida; Akihiro Ito; Machiko Arita
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.271

3.  Corynebacterium propinquum bronchopneumonia in a child with ataxia telangiectasia.

Authors:  Gülşah Malkoçoğlu; Haşim Gencer; Ayşenur Kaya; Nazan Dalgıç; Mehmet Emin Bulut; Elif Aktaş
Journal:  Turk J Pediatr       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.552

4.  "Diphtheroid" pneumonia.

Authors:  N F Jacobs; C A Perlino
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Corynebacterium striatum: a clinically significant isolate from sputum in chronic obstructive airways disease.

Authors:  P Cowling; L Hall
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 6.  Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria.

Authors:  G Funke; A von Graevenitz; J E Clarridge; K A Bernard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for identification of Corynebacterium species.

Authors:  Rong Bao; Xiaodong Gao; Bijie Hu; Zhaoyan Zhou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization.

Authors:  Seema Jain; Wesley H Self; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Pneumonia in a Veterinary Student Infected During Laboratory Work.

Authors:  Lars Heggelund; Peter Gaustad; Othilde Elise Håvelsrud; Jochen Blom; Lars Borgen; Arve Sundset; Henning Sørum; Stig Sophus Frøland
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 10.  Evolving Understanding of the Causes of Pneumonia in Adults, With Special Attention to the Role of Pneumococcus.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Michael S Abers; John G Bartlett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  13 in total

1.  Mouse Subcutaneous BCG Vaccination and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Alter the Lung and Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Fabiola Silva; Raphaël Enaud; Elizabeth Creissen; Marcela Henao-Tamayo; Laurence Delhaes; Angelo Izzo
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Normal Respiratory Flora as a Cause of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Sirus S Jesudasen; Joseph W Barwatt; Daniel N Cohen; Benjamin J Moss; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Nasal microbial composition and chronic otitis media with effusion: A case-control study.

Authors:  Rebecca E Walker; Caroline G Walker; Carlos A Camargo; Jim Bartley; David Flint; John M D Thompson; Edwin A Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Distribution and comparison of bacterial communities in HVAC systems of two university buildings: Implications for indoor air quality and public health.

Authors:  Timothy Sibanda; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Henry Jo Ogola; Chinedu Christopher Obieze; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Frog Skin-Derived Peptides Against Corynebacterium jeikeium: Correlation between Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activities.

Authors:  Bruno Casciaro; Maria Rosa Loffredo; Floriana Cappiello; Walter Verrusio; Vito Domenico Corleto; Maria Luisa Mangoni
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26

6.  An autopsy case of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis caused by Corynebacterium species complicated with diffuse alveolar damage.

Authors:  Ryo Nagasawa; Yu Hara; Takuya Miyazaki; Kota Murohashi; Hiroki Watanabe; Takeshi Kaneko
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-27

7.  Respiratory microbiome profiles differ by recent hospitalization and nursing home residence in patients on mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Min-Gyung Baek; Seong Ji Woo; Nam Eun Kim; Chaeyun Baek; Sungho Won; Youngmi Kim; Jae Jun Lee; Hana Yi; Ji Young Hong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Super-dominant pathobiontic bacteria in the nasopharyngeal microbiota as causative agents of secondary bacterial infection in influenza patients.

Authors:  Tian Qin; Taoran Geng; Haijian Zhou; Yang Han; Hongyu Ren; Zhifeng Qiu; Xudong Nie; Tiekuan Du; Junrong Liang; Pengcheng Du; Wei Jiang; Taisheng Li; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 7.163

9.  Clinical relevance and impact of Corynebacterium isolation in lower respiratory tract of critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Simon Clariot; Ophélie Constant; Raphaël Lepeule; Vincent Fihman; Keyvan Razazi; Fabrice Cook; Arié Attias; Jean-Claude Merle; François Hemery; Eric Levesque; Jean-Winoc Decousser; Olivier Langeron; Nicolas Mongardon
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Candida species in community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic aspiration.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moss; Daniel M Musher
Journal:  Pneumonia (Nathan)       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.