| Literature DB >> 30324022 |
Sai Gong1, Chen Chen1, Jingxian Zhu1, Guangyao Qi1, Shuxia Jiang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cultivating the wine-cap mushroom (Stropharia rugosoannulata) on forestland has become popular in China. However, the effects of wine-cap Stropharia cultivation on soil nutrients and bacterial communities are poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: Forest farming; Fungal biology; High-throughput sequencing; Soil microorganisms; Soil nutrients; Stropharia rugosoannulata
Year: 2018 PMID: 30324022 PMCID: PMC6183509 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Cultivation year of each grid.
| Grids | Cultivation year | Description in the text | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||
| Y000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No-cultivation control |
| Y010 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Fallow for one year after prior cultivation regime |
| Y011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Two years of continuous cultivation regime |
| Y001 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Current-year cultivation regime |
| Y101 | 1 | 0 | 1 | One-year interval cultivation regime |
Notes.
The number “1” in the cultivated year column indicates that the cultivation occurred in the corresponding year, whereas “0” indicates that no cultivation was performed in the corresponding year.
Soil properties according to different grids.
| Grids | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y000 | 18.86 ± 0.029 | 6.88 ± 0.033 | 0.44 ± 0.008 | 0.41 ± 0.005 | 67.85 ± 0.166 | 101.12 ± 0.159 | ||
| Y010 | 19.54 ± 0.035 | 6.85 ± 0.048 | 9.9 ± 0.125 | 0.48 ± 0.004 | 39.18 ± 0.263 | 40.53 ± 0.026 | 119.37 ± 0.088 | |
| Y011 | 18.12 ± 0.028 | 6.97 ± 0.025 | 8.9 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.006 | 0.36 ± 0.002 | 58.02 ± 0.157 | 53.94 ± 0.191 | |
| Y001 | 17.69 ± 0.025 | 6.9 ± 0.039 | 10.4 ± 0.298 | 0.38 ± 0.005 | 37.81 ± 0.043 | 106.27 ± 0.504 | ||
| Y101 | 22.72 ± 0.004 | 6.88 ± 0.051 |
Notes.
Values are the average of three replicate soil samples. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P > 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey analysis). The significant maximum and minimum values of each soil property among all grids are shown in bold.
soil field capacity
soil pH
organic matter
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen
available phosphorus
available potassium
Figure 1Bar chart of bacterial relative abundance at the phylum level and bar chart based on the LDA value.
(A) Bar chart of bacterial relative abundance at the phylum level. Bar chart based on the LDA value, bacterial community groups in comparison pairs with significant differences (LDA score > 4) in abundance are shown. Comparison pairs: (B) Y010/Y000, (C) Y011/Y000, (D) Y001/Y000, (E) Y101/Y000.
Figure 2Principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA).
(A) PCA based on OTUs of the bacterial community. (B) CCA based on edaphic factors and the bacterial community composition. Different grids are represented by different colours. Spots with the same colour represent the same grids. Edaphic factors are shown as arrows, and the degree of correlation between one edaphic factor and community/species composition is represented by the length of the arrow. Longer arrows indicate higher correlations. The angle constructed by the arrow and the ordination axes indicates the correlation between the edaphic factors and the ordination axes. A smaller angle indicates a higher correlation. FC, field capacity; OM, organic matter; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; AN, alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; and AK, available potassium. Available edaphic factors for the bacterial community composition are shown as *, i.e., having a variance inflation factor (VIF) value of less than 20.