| Literature DB >> 30323709 |
M K Meghvansi1, Kamal Prasad1, S K Mahna1.
Abstract
In the current study, we recovered sixteen bradyrhizobial isolates from root nodules of two soybean genotypes (JS 335 and PK 472) grown in two distinct agro-climatic conditions (Bundi and Udaipur) of Rajasthan, India. Symbiotic effectiveness of these isolates was evaluated under greenhouse conditions. On the basis of statistical analysis of data (ANOVA followed by LSD P ⩽ 0.05), four effective isolates namely BJ335-1, BPK-3, BPK-5 and UJ335-1 were screened out from the greenhouse experiment. The compatibility to three soybean genotypes, and the competitive ability with other field population of rhizobia, of these four isolates was further determined by conducting field trial. Results demonstrated significant variation in the symbiotic potential of tested isolates with respect to different soybean genotypes. Response of soybean genotype JS 335 towards inoculation was relatively better suggesting its suitability in the Haroti region of Rajasthan. Moreover, BJ 335-1 and BPK-3 isolates were found to be highly efficient as they significantly improved the nodulation, plant growth and seed yield. Possible factors responsible for variable response of bradyrhizobial isolates towards inoculation in three soybean genotypes are discussed. Further, the inoculants production of effective isolates at large scale and their multilocational trials are required to check their suitability for the other agro-climatic conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Agro-climatic regions; Bradyrhizobium japonicum; Inoculation; Soybean cultivars; Symbiotic effectiveness
Year: 2010 PMID: 30323709 PMCID: PMC6181149 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Location map. (1) Sampling site Bundi; (2) sampling site Udaipur; (3) research lab Ajmer.
Status of origin and cultural/biochemical characteristics of sixteen bradyrhizobial strains of soybean.
| Brady-rhizobial strains | Parent cultivar | Region of origin | Growth on HAM | Nitrate reduction | H2S production | Methyl red test | Citrate utilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ 335-1 | JS 335 | Bundi | ++++ | ++++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| BJ 335-2 | JS 335 | Bundi | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| BPK-1 | PK 472 | Bundi | +++ | +++ | −ve∗ | −ve∗ | −ve |
| BPK-2 | PK 472 | Bundi | +++ | ++++ | −ve | −ve | −ve∗∗ |
| BPK-3 | PK 472 | Bundi | ++++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| BPK-4 | PK 472 | Bundi | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| BPK-5 | PK 472 | Bundi | ++++ | ++++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| BPK-6 | PK 472 | Bundi | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve∗ | −ve |
| BPK-7 | PK 472 | Bundi | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve∗ |
| BPK-8 | PK 472 | Bundi | ++++ | +++ | −ve∗ | −ve | −ve |
| UJ 335-1 | JS 335 | Udaipur | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| UJ 335-2 | JS 335 | Udaipur | +++ | ++++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| UJ 335-3 | JS 335 | Udaipur | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve∗∗ | −ve |
| UJ 335-4 | JS 335 | Udaipur | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| UJ 335-5 | JS 335 | Udaipur | ++++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve∗∗ |
| UJ 335-6 | JS 335 | Udaipur | +++ | +++ | −ve | −ve | −ve |
‘−ve’ Negative test; ‘−ve∗’ 95% negative test; ‘−ve∗∗’: 90% negative test.
‘++++’ 100% Positive test; ‘+++’ 95% positive test; ‘HAM’ Hofer’s Alkaline medium.
Figure 2Effect of bradyrhizobial inoculation on nodulation and growth of soybean genotype JS 335 under greenhouse conditions. Values without common letters differ significantly at LSD P ⩽ 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of bradyrhizobial inoculation on nodulation and growth of soybean genotype PK 472 under greenhouse conditions. Values without common letters differ significantly at LSD P ⩽ 0.05.
Figure 4Acetylene reductase activity (ARA) of root nodules systems (rns) of two soybean genotypes inoculated with four bradyrhizobial isolates under controlled conditions. Values without common letters differ significantly at LSD P ⩽ 0.05 (A & E-BJ335-1; B & F-BPK-3; C & G- BPK-5; D & HUJ335-1.Values for A–D recorded in cv. JS 335 and value for E–H recorded in cv. PK 472).
Effect of bradyrhizobial inoculation on nodulation and growth of three soybean cultivars under field conditions.
| Bradyrhizobial isolates | cv. JS 335 | cv. JS 71-05 | cv. NRC 12 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nodule biomass (g plant−1) | Shoot N (%) | Shoot biomass (g plant−1) | Nodule biomass (g plant−1) | Shoot N (%) | Shoot biomass (g plant−1) | Nodule biomass (g plant−1) | Shoot N (%) | Shoot biomass (g plant−1) | |
| Control | 0.117b ± 0.012 | 1.71 | 12.42b ± 0.78 | 0.108b ± 0.017 | 1.48 | 11.38b ± 1.69 | 0.113c ± 0.011 | 1.29 | 13.98b ± 0.79 |
| BJ335-1 | 0.123ab ± 0.017 | 2.11 | 14.48a ± 1.21 | 0.143a ± 0.023 | 1.8 | 13.10a ± 1.05 | 0.133b ± 0.020 | 1.65 | 14.80b ± 0.96 |
| BPK-3 | 0.131a ± 0.025 | 2.48 | 15.74a ± 0.83 | 0.156a ± 0.026 | 1.96 | 15.84a ± 0.93 | 0.164a ± 0.009 | 1.73 | 17.47a ± 1.68 |
| BPK-5 | 0.120b ± 0.016 | 2.09 | 13.22b ± 2.06 | 0.121b ± 0.026 | 1.84 | 12.21b ± 0.81 | 0.139b ± 0.013 | 1.47 | 14.67b ± 1.60 |
| UJ335-1 | 0.122b ± 0.021 | 1.84 | 11.43bc ± 1.58 | 0.105bc ± 0.009 | 1.44 | 10.48bc ± 1.66 | 0.122b ± 0.016 | 1.33 | 12.93bc ± 2.12 |
Data on nodule biomass and shoot biomass are mean of 15 plants. ± Standard error.
Values without common letters differ significantly at LSD P ⩽ 0.05.
Figure 5Effect of bradyrhizobial inoculation on seed yield of three soybean genotype under field conditions. Values without common letters differ significantly at LSD P ⩽ 0.05.