Literature DB >> 30323358

Relapse after complete response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: implications of duration of response and patterns of relapse.

Surbhi Sidana1, Nidhi Tandon1, Angela Dispenzieri1, Morie A Gertz1, Francis K Buadi1, Martha Q Lacy1, David Dingli1, Amie L Fonder1, Suzanne R Hayman1, Miriam A Hobbs1, Wilson I Gonsalves1, Rahma M Warsame1, Taxiarchis Kourelis1, Yi Lisa Hwa1, Prashant Kapoor1, Robert A Kyle1, Nelson Leung1,2, Ronald S Go1, S Vincent Rajkumar1, Shaji K Kumar3.   

Abstract

Achieving a complete response (CR) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM), but data on duration of CR (DurCR) are limited. We evaluated 351 patients (2004-2016), achieving CR with first-line therapy. Patients with sustained DurCR ≥ 24 months (n = 177) had better OS; 150 vs. 81 months, p < 0.001. DurCR ≥ 24 months remained a significant predictor for OS (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.5, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, revised ISS stage, transplant and maintenance therapy. Landmark analysis at 24 months demonstrated similar results, OS: 150 vs. 83 months, p < 0.001. Survival benefit persisted even after loss of CR, with median OS being 89 vs. 56 months (p = 0.005), respectively. Patterns of loss of CR were heterogeneous, with biochemical relapse in 59 (25%); symptomatic relapse in 58 (24%); positive immunofixation/monoclonal protein rise not meeting relapse/progression criteria in 88 (37%) and abnormal free light chain ratio in LC MM in 34 (14%) patients. OS from start of first-line therapy was superior in patients starting second-line treatment for biochemical vs. symptomatic relapse (125 vs. 81 months, p = 0.001). This is likely attributable to underlying disease biology and prevention of end-organ damage by early treatment initiation, as benefit was independent of R-ISS stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30323358     DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0271-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  6 in total

1.  The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Yuting Yan; Xuehan Mao; Jiahui Liu; Huishou Fan; Chenxing Du; Zengjun Li; Shuhua Yi; Yan Xu; Rui Lv; Wei Liu; Shuhui Deng; Weiwei Sui; Qi Wang; Dehui Zou; Jianxiang Wang; Tao Cheng; Fenghuang Zhan; Yu-Tzu Tai; Chenglu Yuan; Xin Du; Lugui Qiu; Kenneth C Anderson; Gang An
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-08

2.  Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where.

Authors:  Andrew J Yee; Noopur Raje
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 3.  Management of Multiple Myeloma in the Middle East: Unmet Needs, Challenges and Perspective.

Authors:  Ahmad Ibrahim; Nabil Chamseddine; Jean El-Cheikh; Colette Hanna; Walid Moukadem; Fady Nasr; Ahmad Younis; Ali Bazarbachi
Journal:  Clin Hematol Int       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 4.  Gaps and opportunities in the treatment of relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma: Consensus recommendations of the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Lawrence Baizer; Natalie S Callander; Sergio A Giralt; Jens Hillengass; Boris Freidlin; Antje Hoering; Paul G Richardson; Elena I Schwartz; Anthony Reiman; Suzanne Lentzsch; Philip L McCarthy; Sundar Jagannath; Andrew J Yee; Richard F Little; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 9.812

5.  Early detection of treatment failure and early rescue intervention in multiple myeloma: time for new approaches.

Authors:  Juan José Lahuerta; Bruno Paiva; Ana Jiménez-Ubieto; José Sánchez-Pina; María-Victoria Mateos; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San-Miguel
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 6.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Minimal Disease With Maximal Implications.

Authors:  Charalampos Charalampous; Taxiarchis Kourelis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.