Literature DB >> 3032323

Why women are not receiving anti-Rh prophylaxis.

R M Hussey.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3032323      PMCID： PMC1245119          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.294.6564.119-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN： 0267-0623


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Haemolytic disease of the newborn--the changing scene.

Authors:  L A Tovey
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-09
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Use of anti-D in general practice.

Authors:  D R Russell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Reported management of threatened miscarriage by general practitioners in Wessex.

Authors:  C Everett; H Ashurst; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-09-05

3.  Why women are not receiving anti-Rh prophylaxis.

Authors:  L A Tovey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-02-21

Review 4.  Is anti-D immunoglobulin unnecessary in the domiciliary treatment of miscarriages?

Authors:  C B Everett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.