Literature DB >> 30322659

Hand grip diversity and frequency during the use of Lower Palaeolithic stone cutting-tools.

Alastair Key1, Stephen R Merritt2, Tracy L Kivell3.   

Abstract

The suite of anatomical features contributing to the unique gripping capabilities of the modern human hand evolved alongside the proliferation of Lower Palaeolithic flaked tool technologies across the Old World. Experimental studies investigating their potential co-evolution suggest that the use of flakes, handaxes, and other stone tools is facilitated by manipulative capabilities consistent with the evolutionary trajectory of the hominin hand during this period. Grip analyses have provided important contributions to this understanding. To date, however, there has been no large-scale investigation of grip diversity during flaked stone-tool use, empirical comparative analyses of grip use frequencies, or examination of ergonomic relationships between grip choice and stone tool type and form. Here, we conduct four experimental studies, using replica Lower Palaeolithic stone tools in a series of actualistic and laboratory-based contexts, to record grip type and frequency of grip use during 1067 stone tool-use events by 123 individuals. Using detailed morphometric data recorded from each tool, we demonstrate how grip choice varies according to the type and form of stone tool used, and how these relationships differ between tool-use contexts. We identify 29 grip types across all tool-use events, with significant differences recorded in their frequency of use dependent on tool type, tool form, and the context of use. Despite the influence of these three factors, there is consistency in the frequent use of a limited number (≤4) of grip types within each experiment and the consistent and seemingly forceful recruitment of the thumb and index finger. Accordingly, we argue that there are deep-rooted, ergonomically-related, regularities in how stone tools are gripped during their use, that these regularities may have been present during the use of stone tools by Plio-Pleistocene hominins, and any subsequent selective pressures would likely have been focused on the first and second digit.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flake; Hand evolution; Handaxe; Hominin; Manipulation; Stone tool variation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30322659     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  4 in total

1.  A biface production older than 600 ka ago at Notarchirico (Southern Italy) contribution to understanding early Acheulean cognition and skills in Europe.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Moncel; Carmen Santagata; Alison Pereira; Sébastien Nomade; Jean-Jacques Bahain; Pierre Voinchet; Marcello Piperno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The unexpected importance of the fifth digit during stone tool production.

Authors:  Alastair J M Key; Christopher J Dunmore; Mary W Marzke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Biomechanics of the human thumb and the evolution of dexterity.

Authors:  Fotios Alexandros Karakostis; Daniel Haeufle; Ioanna Anastopoulou; Konstantinos Moraitis; Gerhard Hotz; Vangelis Tourloukis; Katerina Harvati
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The implications of thumb movements for Neanderthal and modern human manipulation.

Authors:  Ameline Bardo; Marie-Hélène Moncel; Christopher J Dunmore; Tracy L Kivell; Emmanuelle Pouydebat; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.