Literature DB >> 30322506

Recruiting young adult cancer patients: Experiences and sample characteristics from a 12-month longitudinal study.

Katja Leuteritz1, Michael Friedrich2, Erik Nowe2, Annekathrin Sender2, Sabine Taubenheim3, Yve Stoebel-Richter4, Kristina Geue2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies among young adult cancer patients are necessary to improve their psychosocial care situation. However, achieving high response rates in this group is challenging. This study focused on the psychosocial life and supportive care situation of young adult cancer patients, and reports the recruitment and retention strategies, sample characteristics and preferences.
METHOD: Participants (aged 18-39  years at diagnosis) diagnosed within the preceding 4 years were recruited from various clinical settings and surveyed at two time points.
RESULTS: In total, 514 participants completed both surveys. Most patients were recruited from rehabilitation clinics (39.5%) and tumour registries (30.2%). Internet-based self-registration resulted in the highest yield of participants. Participants in inpatient (rehabilitation) treatment preferred to complete a hard copy of the questionnaire at baseline (59.7%), but a strong preference for using the online form was found at follow-up (74.5%). The distribution of diagnoses in the sample was almost comparable to the national incidence rates in Germany. Males and patients with melanoma were slightly under-represented.
CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of a large sample of young adult cancer patients is possible but requires intensive recruitment efforts, particularly in Germany. Social media and age-specific approaches were found to be effective for recruiting and retaining participants. Giving patients the option to complete a hard copy or the online version of the questionnaire, especially during inpatient treatment, may optimise participation rates. Psychosocial research and support programmes for young adults should consider that women are probably more likely to participate in psychosocial (research) programmes than men.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experiences; Internet; Longitudinal study; Online; Preferences; Psychosocial; Recruitment; Social media

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30322506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  7 in total

1.  Correlates related to follow-up in a community engagement program in North Central Florida.

Authors:  Ayodeji Otufowora; Yiyang Liu; Deepthi S Varma; Catherine W Striley; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2020-09-19

2.  Unmet supportive care needs in young adult cancer patients: associations and changes over time. Results from the AYA-Leipzig study.

Authors:  Annekathrin Sender; Michael Friedrich; Katja Leuteritz; Erik Nowe; Yve Stöbel-Richter; Anja Mehnert; Kristina Geue
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Sexuality and cancer in adolescents and young adults - a comparison between reproductive cancer patients and patients with non-reproductive cancer.

Authors:  Julian Mütsch; Michael Friedrich; Katja Leuteritz; Annekathrin Sender; Kristina Geue; Anja Hilbert; Yve Stöbel-Richter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Recruiting Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors for Patient-Reported Outcome Research: Experiences and Sample Characteristics of the SURVAYA Study.

Authors:  Carla Vlooswijk; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Silvie H M Janssen; Esther Derksen; Milou J P Reuvers; Rhodé Bijlsma; Suzanne E J Kaal; Jan Martijn Kerst; Jacqueline M Tromp; Monique E M M Bos; Tom van der Hulle; Roy I Lalisang; Janine Nuver; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Winette T A van der Graaf; Olga Husson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Psychological, functional and social outcomes in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors over time: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Natalie K Bradford; Fiona E J McDonald; Helen Bibby; Cindy Kok; Pandora Patterson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Study retention and attrition in a longitudinal cohort study including patient-reported outcomes, fieldwork and biobank samples: results of the Netherlands quality of life and Biomedical cohort study (NET-QUBIC) among 739 head and neck cancer patients and 262 informal caregivers.

Authors:  Femke Jansen; Ruud H Brakenhoff; Rob J Baatenburg de Jong; Johannes A Langendijk; C René Leemans; Robert P Takes; Chris H J Terhaard; Jan H Smit; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Work ability and cognitive impairments in young adult cancer patients: associated factors and changes over time-results from the AYA-Leipzig study.

Authors:  Hannah Brock; Michael Friedrich; Annekathrin Sender; Diana Richter; Kristina Geue; Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf; Katja Leuteritz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.