Literature DB >> 30321967

Surgical repair of osteochondral lesions of the talus using biologic inlay osteochondral reconstruction: Clinical outcomes after treatment using a medial malleolar osteotomy approach compared to an arthroscopically-assisted approach.

Boguslaw Sadlik1, Lukasz Kolodziej2, Mariusz Puszkarz1, Hubert Laprus1, Michal Mojzesz1, Graeme P Whyte3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus affecting the medial aspect of the talar dome is typically performed using medial malleolar osteotomy to optimize access. This study compares clinical outcomes of lesions repaired using biologic inlay osteochondral reconstruction in patients who did or did not undergo medial malleolar osteotomy, depending on defect dimensions.
METHODS: Patients treated for osteochonral lesions of the talus through a medial mallolar approach or arthroscopically-assisted approach were prospectively followed. Assessment tools consisted of the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS). The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was used postoperatively.
RESULTS: Data for 24 patients (mean age 34years, mean follow-up 22 months) was analyzed. Mean preoperative/final AOFAS and VAS in those who underwent osteotomy were 57.7/81.2 and 5.7/1.9 (p<0.001), respectively. In those who underwent arthroscopically-assisted reconstruction, mean preoperative/final AOFAS and VAS were 54.4/84.0 and 7.6/2.0 (p<0.001), respectively. There was no difference in mean MOCART score (p=0.662) for those treated with osteotomy (67.3) compared to those without (70.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome can be treated successfully by biological inlay osteochondral reconstruction technique without medial malleolar osteotomy, with good to excellent clinical outcomes expected. MRI demonstrates good integration of the graft into surrounding tissue.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle arthroscopy; Cartilage repair; Medial malleolar osteotomy; Osteochondral lesion; Osteochondral reconstruction; Talar dome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30321967     DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1268-7731            Impact factor:   2.705


  5 in total

1.  Influence of the Medial Malleolus Osteotomy on the Clinical Outcome of M-BMS + I/III Collagen Scaffold in Medial Talar Osteochondral Lesion (German Cartilage Register/Knorpelregister DGOU).

Authors:  Oliver Gottschalk; Sebastian Felix Baumbach; Sebastian Altenberger; Daniel Körner; Matthias Aurich; Christian Plaass; Sarah Ettinger; Daniel Guenther; Christoph Becher; Hubert Hörterer; Markus Walther
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Osteochondral autograft transfer (mosaicplasty) for treatment of patients with osteochondral lesions of talus.

Authors:  Amir Sabaghzadeh; Fateme Mirzaee; Heydar Shahriari Rad; Fateme Bahramian; Ardeshir Alidousti; Hamidreza Aslani
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-24

3.  Medial Transmalleolar Portal Technique for Ankle Arthroscopic Headless Screw Fixation of Talar Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions.

Authors:  Patrick A Massey; Wayne Scalisi; Carver Montgomery; Kaylan N McClary; Jennifer S Walt; Giovanni F Solitro; Shane Barton
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 4.  Return to Sports After Surgical Treatment of Osteochondral Defects of the Talus: A Systematic Review of 2347 Cases.

Authors:  Jason A H Steman; Jari Dahmen; Kaj T A Lambers; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-22

5.  Triplane osteotomy combined with talar non-weight-bearing area autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jing-Qi Liang; Xiao-Dong Wen; Pei-Long Liu; Jun Lu; Hong-Mou Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.